04-18-2012, 01:01 AM
Your left eye is connected to your right brain, and vice versa. It has also been said that those who are left-handed operate predominately from their right brain.
To me, the right brain is associated with characteristics that we associate with STO qualities, such as creativity, intuition, imagination, unity (big picture), open-ended questions, etc.
Not that the left-brain is STS, but STS does base itself off the strict, logical instructive, comparative, controlling, authority-responding way of thinking.
Both have their upsides, but seeing as both are inherent in our biology, what exactly is the use of thinking in terms of left-hand/right-hand paths? Or, polarities?
Isn't finding a balance humanity's greatest objective? Why does Ra or Q'uo define this separation, even into 4th density, when both are necessary to achieve a greater, unified perspective of reality in the universe?
When I first read these channelings, these paths, I see as congruent with polarity, struck a chord of fear in me, and now, I see them as being two sides of the same coin. Why is there no other way for a, shall I say, species, to define a concept they have already overcome that doesn't promote separation?
To me, the right brain is associated with characteristics that we associate with STO qualities, such as creativity, intuition, imagination, unity (big picture), open-ended questions, etc.
Not that the left-brain is STS, but STS does base itself off the strict, logical instructive, comparative, controlling, authority-responding way of thinking.
Both have their upsides, but seeing as both are inherent in our biology, what exactly is the use of thinking in terms of left-hand/right-hand paths? Or, polarities?
Isn't finding a balance humanity's greatest objective? Why does Ra or Q'uo define this separation, even into 4th density, when both are necessary to achieve a greater, unified perspective of reality in the universe?
When I first read these channelings, these paths, I see as congruent with polarity, struck a chord of fear in me, and now, I see them as being two sides of the same coin. Why is there no other way for a, shall I say, species, to define a concept they have already overcome that doesn't promote separation?