02-25-2012, 06:35 AM
Taken, word for word, from one of my notebooks, in the exact order of entry. Awareness of the names of the identities did not come until a year later. This is an exchange between Azrael (first) and Andariel, two portions of the spiritual triad which matrices my "I am".
Pleasant readings, blessings and love in light, adonai. Logos.
-
I choose Life.
This is a new beginning but not an end. Everything cycles in to itself, new growth rooted in old decay. Everything remains, attached to itself or not. This is the way of things. Thoughts tend to be a little more fickle, changing, morphing and irregular. How are thoughts and things related?
A thing can be observed, interacted with and perceived in a precise manner, they are particular. Thoughts are the reflections of things, or the other way around? It is commonly thought that there is a static world of "things" which stimulate thought and experience. However, there are many thoughts that are not the result of direct interaction. The imagination is direct evidence of irrational construction.
That is, it is capable of establishing perceptions which cause the experience of things to be altered. Daydreaming or fantasy can be thought of as a way to alter the experience of things. However some are able to even alter their direct physical experience with imaginative suggestion. Is this just madness, a distortion of reality? Or perhaps it hints at a more individualized principle of experience. Where we are all given a canvas to produce our own amaglamate image. Indeed, the number of mediums in artistry, I think, demonstrates a parallel with the individual capacity to construct a personalized, yet congruent within itself, image of their own perceptual experience.
We all have varying spectrums of thought from which we guide our lives and experience. These incoming streams of impression direction influence our outward projections of expression, meeting in the middle and resulting in the next impression.
Impression -> Reflects as Expression
Expressions -> Reflections as Impression
Since everything is light, all perception must be a function of reflection, a hologram. Depth is truly only a perception, something seen but not experienced. Top to bottom, side to side, our vision is a window. We can see far beyond, yet it is always through a limited scope, the observer and the observed being perpendicular.
Who's to say there's anything at the back of one's head? Perhaps we all carry our own light through the darkness? From when did our light come?
---
The particular state of being which sees irritation is very peculiar. Like a fly buzzing around your head the emotions float, can be heard and considered but the actual presence of the instigating factor often eludes direct observation. Are powerful emotions the result of an energetic frequency change?
There are many chemicals associated with emotions and changing moods, yet these are not feelings themselves. I presume "feeling" to be the result of electrical impulses triggering nerve centers, but how does the brain understand the personality? How does the brain know which feeling is to be felt?
It requires very specific information, involving the composition of the individual's personality which is constantly changing in the face of experience. Yet, it fe all possess the same chemicals and basic physical structure, how does such a vast diversity of feelings and personality rise from the same materials? Of course, we all have different balances of these materials, different dominant aspects. Are these simply inherit from the previous generation?
However the fact that many children and people are quite unlike their parents, and of evolution, progressive mutation, suggests that genetic inheritance only provides a foundation upon which survival can be built. Once survival is assured, however, natural selection begins to lose its grip on the authority of necessity. Once the basic physical necessities are sustained where does the need for further evolution arise from?
---
Is it possible to observe a thought? Is this the purpose of visualization? Why is our imagination free to function without the limitations we experience in the body? This is the same as when we dream, are these simply night-time imaginations? Why would our minds push themselves in to such irrational scenarios if the truth of the universe is in its logic? Indeed, imagination defies every possible facet of reality, but at the same time it has the limits of the individual psyche.
Why can some imagine much better than others? Or perhaps we all imagine at the same level, just within different logical frameworks? This difference is noticable even in the earliest stages of life, the capacity for unique thought structure and unorthodox conceptions. Some keep this versatility as they grow, whereas other attach on to comfortable, established notions. Does one see more than the other?
If we all have the same necessities for survival why are our necessities for fulfillment so drastically varied? Indeed, perhaps we do not all have even the same basic need for contentment? Although on a general level we all need food, water and air to keep ourselves alive, the manner, type and frequency of these intakes vary from individual to individual. Food varies the greatest, some eat lots, some eat little, some like flavours, others can be indifferent. Some like food cooked, prepared and even organized visually before hey desire the consumption. Others work more based on smell, texture or consistency.
The massive variance of cuisine shows that there is more to ingestion than the simple absorption of nutrients. Things like chocolate clearly also influence a more content mental state. Indeed, eating for comfort is quite different from eating for survival. Yet, if food is such a basic facet of living why should it have an emotional influence? Doesn't this directly interfere with the survival mechanism?
In fact, it seems we simply have the choice of survival. Our body will stay alive so long as we choose to keep it alive.
---
Is there any distinction between a necessity and a desire? Do we need to have our desires fulfilled? I suppose survival is the most basic form of desire. Yet a desire can be raised above this instinct. The fear, or rejection, of the notion of death can be overcome. Survive because you can, not because you have to.
I put it in this forum because it's not really channeling, or anything more than a display of my day to day thoughts in writing.
I might as well put the little bit that is a thought process from Tanner, the body's consciousness.
Lucid
Dream-like wake
Adorned without
Conceived within
The vision of the mind
---
Why do I desire explanation? Explanation for all of existence no less. What pulls me into the mystery? There is part of me which tugs and pulls, urging and appealing. From whence did my desires come? Is it simply my rash desire to experience fantasy? Yet how can so many of the world's population feel the same? How can generations of people, divided by time and place, continue to pursure the unimaginable desire if nothing has ever been attained? Are humans really so ignorant?
Pleasant readings, blessings and love in light, adonai. Logos.
-
I choose Life.
This is a new beginning but not an end. Everything cycles in to itself, new growth rooted in old decay. Everything remains, attached to itself or not. This is the way of things. Thoughts tend to be a little more fickle, changing, morphing and irregular. How are thoughts and things related?
A thing can be observed, interacted with and perceived in a precise manner, they are particular. Thoughts are the reflections of things, or the other way around? It is commonly thought that there is a static world of "things" which stimulate thought and experience. However, there are many thoughts that are not the result of direct interaction. The imagination is direct evidence of irrational construction.
That is, it is capable of establishing perceptions which cause the experience of things to be altered. Daydreaming or fantasy can be thought of as a way to alter the experience of things. However some are able to even alter their direct physical experience with imaginative suggestion. Is this just madness, a distortion of reality? Or perhaps it hints at a more individualized principle of experience. Where we are all given a canvas to produce our own amaglamate image. Indeed, the number of mediums in artistry, I think, demonstrates a parallel with the individual capacity to construct a personalized, yet congruent within itself, image of their own perceptual experience.
We all have varying spectrums of thought from which we guide our lives and experience. These incoming streams of impression direction influence our outward projections of expression, meeting in the middle and resulting in the next impression.
Impression -> Reflects as Expression
Expressions -> Reflections as Impression
Since everything is light, all perception must be a function of reflection, a hologram. Depth is truly only a perception, something seen but not experienced. Top to bottom, side to side, our vision is a window. We can see far beyond, yet it is always through a limited scope, the observer and the observed being perpendicular.
Who's to say there's anything at the back of one's head? Perhaps we all carry our own light through the darkness? From when did our light come?
---
The particular state of being which sees irritation is very peculiar. Like a fly buzzing around your head the emotions float, can be heard and considered but the actual presence of the instigating factor often eludes direct observation. Are powerful emotions the result of an energetic frequency change?
There are many chemicals associated with emotions and changing moods, yet these are not feelings themselves. I presume "feeling" to be the result of electrical impulses triggering nerve centers, but how does the brain understand the personality? How does the brain know which feeling is to be felt?
It requires very specific information, involving the composition of the individual's personality which is constantly changing in the face of experience. Yet, it fe all possess the same chemicals and basic physical structure, how does such a vast diversity of feelings and personality rise from the same materials? Of course, we all have different balances of these materials, different dominant aspects. Are these simply inherit from the previous generation?
However the fact that many children and people are quite unlike their parents, and of evolution, progressive mutation, suggests that genetic inheritance only provides a foundation upon which survival can be built. Once survival is assured, however, natural selection begins to lose its grip on the authority of necessity. Once the basic physical necessities are sustained where does the need for further evolution arise from?
---
Is it possible to observe a thought? Is this the purpose of visualization? Why is our imagination free to function without the limitations we experience in the body? This is the same as when we dream, are these simply night-time imaginations? Why would our minds push themselves in to such irrational scenarios if the truth of the universe is in its logic? Indeed, imagination defies every possible facet of reality, but at the same time it has the limits of the individual psyche.
Why can some imagine much better than others? Or perhaps we all imagine at the same level, just within different logical frameworks? This difference is noticable even in the earliest stages of life, the capacity for unique thought structure and unorthodox conceptions. Some keep this versatility as they grow, whereas other attach on to comfortable, established notions. Does one see more than the other?
If we all have the same necessities for survival why are our necessities for fulfillment so drastically varied? Indeed, perhaps we do not all have even the same basic need for contentment? Although on a general level we all need food, water and air to keep ourselves alive, the manner, type and frequency of these intakes vary from individual to individual. Food varies the greatest, some eat lots, some eat little, some like flavours, others can be indifferent. Some like food cooked, prepared and even organized visually before hey desire the consumption. Others work more based on smell, texture or consistency.
The massive variance of cuisine shows that there is more to ingestion than the simple absorption of nutrients. Things like chocolate clearly also influence a more content mental state. Indeed, eating for comfort is quite different from eating for survival. Yet, if food is such a basic facet of living why should it have an emotional influence? Doesn't this directly interfere with the survival mechanism?
In fact, it seems we simply have the choice of survival. Our body will stay alive so long as we choose to keep it alive.
---
Is there any distinction between a necessity and a desire? Do we need to have our desires fulfilled? I suppose survival is the most basic form of desire. Yet a desire can be raised above this instinct. The fear, or rejection, of the notion of death can be overcome. Survive because you can, not because you have to.
I put it in this forum because it's not really channeling, or anything more than a display of my day to day thoughts in writing.
I might as well put the little bit that is a thought process from Tanner, the body's consciousness.
Lucid
Dream-like wake
Adorned without
Conceived within
The vision of the mind
---
Why do I desire explanation? Explanation for all of existence no less. What pulls me into the mystery? There is part of me which tugs and pulls, urging and appealing. From whence did my desires come? Is it simply my rash desire to experience fantasy? Yet how can so many of the world's population feel the same? How can generations of people, divided by time and place, continue to pursure the unimaginable desire if nothing has ever been attained? Are humans really so ignorant?
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)