An actual 25,000 year cycle.

[Glow]

So Ra spoke of it. 25,000 year cycles, 3 cycles in a major cycle and I believe he said this was the last of three major cycles.

Approximately 100-700 years left in the 1980s

So am I the only one who didn’t know astronomers call these cycles, the great year, or procession of the equinoxes?

Wiki

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Year

"The period of one complete cycle of the equinoxes around the ecliptic, or about 25,800 years". A more precise figure of 25,772 years is currently accepted.[1]

So is there any way to know accurately where we are in the cycle?
I’ve read two things saying it’s like basically now(the span of time obviously) but the cynic in me would love a more educated in this area person to tell me if that’s accurate or not.

I am so far from being an astronomer and I know people love drama but I would really love to know if this is true. It’s just cool it aligns with Ra’s info so that’s enough really.

Of course how to know what the actual starting point is vs just the cycle length.

Ok brainiacs I’d love interpretations I feel it’s not in my wheel house and know when to ask for help.

[Aion]

Ah welcome to the Precession of the Equinox.

https://www.britannica.com/science/prece...-equinoxes

We look to the stars for the answer. The figures are based on the movement of the Zodiacal signs through the houses.

It is based on a complete cycle through all 12 signs. This is where the whole "Age of Aquarius" idea comes from.

https://earthsky.org/human-world/when-wi...rius-begin

However, as for precision, since we are doing cosmic scale calculations it's very difficult to get any precise idea of time.

If you are interested in reading, the book Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock is an interesting read that explores this idea in relation to the 'lost civilizations' of our world. Fun food for thought.

Also, yes, I believe that is exactly the cycle Ra is referring to. At least, that's what it looks like to me.

[Glow]

Thanks Aion! That sounds like a great book.
Awesome links. Kind of glad to see I was correct to suspect it couldn’t be precisely predicted.
Some sources seemed to really making it an “event” date type thing which seemed unrealistic but knowing I am not knowledgeable about this I thought I’d ask.

Seems much like the 3D energy to 4D energy transition I would imagine since it’s celestial the energies of Pisces would slowly lessen as Aquarius slowly built up.

Not a clock strike thing.

Very cool though it’s the same cycle length.

[zedro]

This theory on what the precession actually is falls more in line with channeled material, this was really a holy s*** moment. The whole electric universe theory is much better "science" if you ask me, check out the channel, it fills out where today's scientific orthodoxy falls flat on it's face.

When I first read the LOO I was surprised that Ra or LL never associated the cycle to the precession as it seemed like the obvious cosmological clockwork. Now knowing that it's most likely based on a helical progression thru the galaxy rather than just a wobble is real icing on the cake.

https://youtu.be/mdLxP-w1LGg for the precession

https://www.youtube.com/user/ThunderboltsProject

[Sacred Fool]

  
The appearance from Earth of the galactic rotation takes about 75,000 years.  I kind of doubt that's the same on Mars, but Maldek's 3D cycle was also 75,000 years.  This may be the standard for a 3D planet.  (I couldn't find a specific citation to that effect.)  The 6D cycle, by the way is a multiple of that: 75 million years.
  

[Aion]

Thanks Aion! That sounds like a great book.
Awesome links. Kind of glad to see I was correct to suspect it couldn’t be precisely predicted.
Some sources seemed to really making it an “event” date type thing which seemed unrealistic but knowing I am not knowledgeable about this I thought I’d ask.

Seems much like the 3D energy to 4D energy transition I would imagine since it’s celestial the energies of Pisces would slowly lessen as Aquarius slowly built up.

Not a clock strike thing.

Very cool though it’s the same cycle length.

There is an interesting correlation there.

While the Precession of the Equinox is due to the "wobble" of the Earth as it zooms through space, being part of a long arm of the galaxy, it seems that the motion through the densities is more like traveling through a gradient. I think if we were to "superimpose" the gradient of densities over top of the galaxy we would get something like this.



Imagine the center of the galaxy at the center of the spiral. My intuition tells me this is the nature of the "rays" and densities as they are traveled through. Although, it's more like a torus and it is three dimensional. I'll have to try and make up a graphic sometime. I can't say exactly how many iterations of the densities. The latest models of the galaxy have four distinct arms, so maybe the colour arrangement would be more like this (minus the black zones lol)



Again though, this is 2D, so doesn't reeeeallly show what I have in my brain, lol.

What's interesting is that if you line up the numbers, it takes about 225-250 Million years for us to do one cycle around the galaxy, however I don't think that it is just automatic that a planet just bumps up to the next density. It may take more than one cycle to achieve the necessary development to emerge in to the next density. If you take the high number 250 million and divide it by the precession, you get about 10000 precessions for a single galactic cycle. That is a lot of saturations through which the planet may fine-tune its balance.

But here's a fun consideration, what controls the "speed" of the rotation of the galaxy and is our own motion strictly tied to that? I am not sure.

I think that's what all the "graduation" timing is about in the Ra Material. It's actually that period where the planet crosses a galactic threshold where there is a density "split" and entities can either "catch the wave" to move in to the next density or they continue flowing on this one. Either by virtue of 'missing the wave' or choosing not to catch it. It happens either way, whether or not you can take advantage of it depends on you.

Of course, this threshold is a massive area of space, so it's not something that is just a moment, there is time while moving through the density boundary to aim yourself to jump.

What I don't really agree with in the Ra Material are the "graduation" concepts and the "polarity percentages", I think these were just appeals to Don's scientific nature. I admit I am not even entirely convinced that polarity and "service to others" and "service to self" are the defining elements of this whole thing. I feel like it has more to do with the "ability to enjoy a certain degree of light" that allows one to cross the threshold. The mechanism of 'achieving' or growing so I think is quite varied.

[Glow]

This theory on what the precession actually is falls more in line with channeled material, this was really a holy s*** moment. The whole electric universe theory is much better "science" if you ask me, check out the channel, it fills out where today's scientific orthodoxy falls flat on it's face.

When I first read the LOO I was surprised that Ra or LL never associated the cycle to the precession as it seemed like the obvious cosmological clockwork. Now knowing that it's most likely based on a helical progression thru the galaxy rather than just a wobble is real icing on the cake.

https://youtu.be/mdLxP-w1LGg for the precession

https://www.youtube.com/user/ThunderboltsProject

Wow that’s an incredible video. Thanks for sharing. I now have way more questions than I started with but I’m going to check out more of their videos.

[Louisabell]

I got so taken in in 2012 with the idea that the Earth was going to cross the galactic plane, and huge amounts of radiation would hit the Earth. I came pretty close (not really) to joining a group who was setting up an underground bunker. There were a few of them going around. Most were pretty shady

Apparently it was all wrong anyway.

[AnthroHeart]

I got so taken in in 2012 with the idea that the Earth was going to cross the galactic plane, and huge amounts of radiation would hit the Earth. I came pretty close (not really) to joining a group who was setting up an underground bunker. There were a few of them going around. Most were pretty shady  

Apparently it was all wrong anyway.

I have read that when they switched to the Gregorian calendar, it changed our year by 8 years. So it's actually Dec. 21, 2020 they are saying now.
The energy is ramping up though over time. They talk about a solar flash, but I don't believe there will be one of those, at least not as strong as they were mentioning.

If you can feel the energy of Earth, it gets very strong at times, like being plugged into an electrical outlet. Though not as painful, but still sometimes painful.

[Louisabell]

I got so taken in in 2012 with the idea that the Earth was going to cross the galactic plane, and huge amounts of radiation would hit the Earth. I came pretty close (not really) to joining a group who was setting up an underground bunker. There were a few of them going around. Most were pretty shady  

Apparently it was all wrong anyway.

I have read that when they switched to the Gregorian calendar, it changed our year by 8 years. So it's actually Dec. 21, 2020 they are saying now.
The energy is ramping up though over time. They talk about a solar flash, but I don't believe there will be one of those, at least not as strong as they were mentioning.

If you can feel the energy of Earth, it gets very strong at times, like being plugged into an electrical outlet. Though not as painful, but still sometimes painful.

Well, I decided then to stay with the mass population whatever may come, and will do again. But the thing that was wrong was that the Earth would cross the 2D plane of the Milky Way, and the radiation would come from the central galactic sun. It was wrong on both counts, because Earth won't do that for a while and there's a blackhole in the middle of the galaxy. It was fun to think about at the time though.

The blast of radiation was supposed to line up with various "leaps" in evolution experienced on Earth, like the Cambrian explosion. Those seem to happen in cycles as well.

The new 4D energies feel more like waves of scintillating light/electricity to me. It comes and goes, has been intense a few times though.

[AnthroHeart]

I got so taken in in 2012 with the idea that the Earth was going to cross the galactic plane, and huge amounts of radiation would hit the Earth. I came pretty close (not really) to joining a group who was setting up an underground bunker. There were a few of them going around. Most were pretty shady  

Apparently it was all wrong anyway.

I have read that when they switched to the Gregorian calendar, it changed our year by 8 years. So it's actually Dec. 21, 2020 they are saying now.
The energy is ramping up though over time. They talk about a solar flash, but I don't believe there will be one of those, at least not as strong as they were mentioning.

If you can feel the energy of Earth, it gets very strong at times, like being plugged into an electrical outlet. Though not as painful, but still sometimes painful.

Well, I decided then to stay with the mass population whatever may come, and will do again. But the thing that was wrong was that the Earth would cross the 2D plane of the Milky Way, and the radiation would come from the central galactic sun. It was wrong on both counts, because Earth won't do that for a while and there's a blackhole in the middle of the galaxy. It was fun to think about at the time though.

The blast of radiation was supposed to line up with various "leaps" in evolution experienced on Earth, like the Cambrian explosion. Those seem to happen in cycles as well.

The new 4D energies feel more like waves of scintillating light/electricity to me. It comes and goes, has been intense a few times though.

Blackholes have acretion discs, so they can put out a LOT of energy. Look at quasars. They are very large black holes.

[zedro]

I have read that when they switched to the Gregorian calendar, it changed our year by 8 years. So it's actually Dec. 21, 2020 they are saying now.
The energy is ramping up though over time. They talk about a solar flash, but I don't believe there will be one of those, at least not as strong as they were mentioning.

If you can feel the energy of Earth, it gets very strong at times, like being plugged into an electrical outlet. Though not as painful, but still sometimes painful.

We are experiencing a solar storm right now as we are in a new solar cycle. Not to mention the 'morning star' alignment of Jupiter and Saturn that happens only every 800 years, coincidentally landing on the winter solstice as well, which some are claiming is the true official beginning of the age of Aquarius.

https://www.weathernationtv.com/news/str...this-week/

https://foreverconscious.com/the-great-c...ember-2020

[Dtris]

The thing about cycles is that any point can be a beginning or end point.

I was already aware of the precession before reading the LOO thru rudimentary astrology and other sources. The earth's tilted axis and wobble causes the precession but there are many different cycles, and cycles within cycles. This is thoroughly explored in David Wilcock's work which is based on the LOO. His website is what got me interested in the material and when I ordered the books in the early 2000s. He has written 3 major books and iirc the second one focused on the cycles the most.

I will second the Thunderbolts Project and the Electric Universe crowd as a fantastic scientific community that aligns much more closely with a unifying view of the universe than current scientific paradigms.

We are currently in the transition between Age of Aquarius and the previous age. Think of it the same as a cusp in natal charts. Since the zodiac ages are based on the positions of the stars there is no real relation to the calendar, so gaining or losing a few years makes no difference.