A silly guess

[Questioner]

With the font size on my browser, the new rule about Ra sessions in the Law of One forum showed as:
"Ra's address is strictly..."
and my mind instantly filled in the rest with "... confidential, on a need-to-know basis. Don't give out Ra's address or phone number or Stargate code without Ra's permission! We don't want any 'map to the star brothers' homes' to bring more galactic tourists!"

Once I read the actual post, I found that there's a good new rule there. It was a source of confusion to me. I thought that Strictly Law of One was for whatever concepts we wanted to bring up that directly related to the Ra sessions, but all sessions, Ra and others, were in the Sessions forum. I see that a lot of other people took the same guess.

The new rule makes more sense. I thank the moderators for reorganizing the top forum on an all-Ra basis.

[Peregrinus]

I always thought "Strictly Law of One" was for anything in relation to the original 106 sessions, and everything else went to the "Sessions In Focus". Now I am confused...

[Questioner]

Peregrinus, your original thought was correct. The moderators located all the Ra sessions that had been misfiled in "Sessions in Focus," and moved them to "Strictly Law of One" where they should have been in the first place. They also put a note asking that all comments about particular Ra sessions should go in "Strictly." There's nothing for you to change.

[Brittany]

LOL. I have this image in my head of prank calling Ra..."hey, is your galactic refrigerator running?"

[AnthroHeart]

Or "I think your manifestor is broken."