Bring4th
Earth's Evolution - Printable Version

+- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Bring4th Studies (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Spiritual Development & Metaphysical Matters (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Earth's Evolution (/showthread.php?tid=7942)



Earth's Evolution - Nowheretoday - 09-06-2013

Earth's evolution takes 75,000 years, containing three 25,000 years cycle. (9.4).
In astronomy Axial Precession takes 26,000 years. Am I wrong to think these two are related? if not, What is the astronomic relation to these 75,000 years?
I've been looking but I can't find the answer.


RE: Planet evolution - zvonimir - 09-06-2013

look for book Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS

at page 250 starts some explanation i will paste 1 part you can find the rest in the book

The precessional numbers highlighted by Sellers in the Osiris myth are
360, 72, 30 and 12. Most of them are found in a section of the myth
which provides us with biographical details of the various characters.
These have been conveniently summarized by E. A. Wallis Budge, formerly
keeper of Egyptian Antiquities at the British Museum:
The goddess Nut, wife of the sun god Ra, was beloved by the god Geb. When Ra
discovered the intrigue he cursed his wife and declared that she should not be
delivered of a child in any month of any year. Then the god Thoth, who also loved
Nut, played at tables with the moon and won from her five whole days. These he
joined to the 360 days of which the year then consisted [emphasis added]. On the
first of these five days Osiris was brought forth; and at the moment of his birth a
voice was heard to proclaim that the lord of creation was born.
5
Elsewhere the myth informs us that the 300-day year consists of ‘12
months of 30 days each’.
6
And in general, as Sellers observes, ‘phrases
are used which prompt simple mental calculations and an attention to
numbers’.
7
Thus far we have been provided with three of Sellers’s precessional
numbers: 360, 12 and 30. The fourth number, which occurs later in the
text, is by far the most important. As we saw in Chapter Nine, the evil
deity known as Set led a group of conspirators in a plot to kill Osiris. The
number of these conspirators was 72.
With this last number in hand, suggests Sellers, we are now in a
position to boot-up and set running an ancient computer programme:
12 = the number of constellations in the zodiac;
30 = the number of degrees allocated along the ecliptic to each
zodiacal constellation;
72 = the number of years required for the equinoctial sun to complete a
precessional shift of one degree along the ecliptic;
360 = the total number of degrees in the ecliptic;
72 x 30 = 2160 (the number of years required for the sun to complete a
passage of 30 degrees along the ecliptic, i.e., to pass entirely through
any one of the 12 zodiacal constellations);
2160 x 12 (or 360 x 72) = 25,920 (the number of years in one complete
precessional cycle or ‘Great Year’, and thus the total number of years
required to bring about the ‘Great Return’).

Other figures and combinations of figures also emerge, for example:
36, the number of years required for the equinoctial sun to complete a
precessional shift of half a degree along the ecliptic;
4320, the number of years required for the equinoctial sun to complete
a precessional shift of 60 degrees (i.e., two zodiacal constellations).
These, Sellers believes, constitute the basic ingredients of a precessional
code which appears again and again, with eerie persistence, in ancient
myths and sacred architecture. In common with much esoteric
numerology, it is a code in which it is permissible to shift decimal points
to left or right at will and to make use of almost any conceivable
combinations, permutations, multiplications, divisions and fractions of
the essential numbers (all of which relate precisely to the rate of
precession of the equinoxes).
The pre-eminent number in the code is 72. To this is frequently added
36, making 108, and it is permissible to multiply 108 by 100 to get
10,800 or to divide it by 2 to get 54, which may then be multiplied by 10
and expressed as 540 (or as 54,000. or as 540,000, or as 5,400,000, and
so on). Also highly significant is 2160 (the number of years required for
the equinoctial point to transit one zodiacal constellation), which is
sometimes multiplied by 10 and by factors often (to give 216,000,
2,160,000, and so on) and sometimes by 2 to give 4320, or 43,200, or
432,000, or 4,320,000, ad infinition.

there is more info but it wouldnt be ok to post it all here,could be treated as noise.

hope this helps


RE: Planet evolution - Nowheretoday - 09-09-2013

(09-06-2013, 02:01 PM)zvonimir Wrote: look for book Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS

at page 250 starts some explanation i will paste 1 part you can find the rest in the book
...
there is more info but it wouldnt be ok to post it all here,could be treated as noise.

hope this helps

Thanks but still it doesn't say anything about earth's 75,000 years cycle.
Anyone else? I really want to know what is making earth evolve.

Quote:Ra: I am Ra. The fourth density is a vibrational spectrum. Your time/space continuum has spiraled your planetary sphere and your, what we would call galaxy, what you call star, into this vibration. This will cause the planetary sphere itself to electromagnetically realign its vortices of reception of the in-streaming of cosmic forces expressing themselves as vibrational webs so that the Earth will thus be fourth-density magnetized, as you might call it.

I think it has to do with the solar system position with respect to the galaxy.
I'll keep on looking...


RE: Planet evolution - zenmaster - 09-09-2013

(09-09-2013, 12:45 PM)Nowheretoday Wrote: I think it has to do with the solar system position with respect to the galaxy.
I'll keep on looking...
But how is the metaphysical or time/space aspect of a density derived from the solar system position with respect to the galaxy?