![]() |
Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - Printable Version +- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums) +-- Forum: Bring4th Studies (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Science & Technology (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Thread: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” (/showthread.php?tid=6836) |
Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - Adonai One - 03-21-2013 Can man create concious life capable of incarnating second or third-density beings simply based on circuit boards and machinery? Is the singularity truly possible or will artificial intelligence always be artificial? http://singularityhub.com/2013/03/10/leading-neuroscientist-says-kurzweil-singularity-prediction-a-bunch-of-hot-air/ Quote:Describing his new Pattern Recognition Theory of Mind (PRTM) during a Singularity Hub drive along interview last October, Ray Kurzweil voiced an opinion that couldn’t be more different from Nicolelis’. “We now have enough evidence to support a particular theory, …a uniform theory about how the neocortex works. And it’s basically comprised of 300 million pattern recognizers. Most important they can wire themselves in hierarchies to other pattern recognizers. The world is inherently hierarchical and the neocortex allows us to understand it in that hierarchical fashion.” RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - reeay - 03-23-2013 lol singularitarian We cannot create something that complex yet, only machines that do certain functions faster than us. But we can't assume that the brain makes us the way we are, so no matter how hard we try to create 'Frankenstein's monster' we will not be able to create us. We're still a mystery to ourselves. Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - Marc - 03-24-2013 If we could create recreate the mechanics of the brain, who's to say that a soul wouldn't jump in to the mechanics to have a great interesting 'incarnation'. The body after all is just a vehicle for the mind/spirit just as a robot would be. Also even though I'm not a big fan of mechanistic tech (as opposed to intuitive tech), if the will is aligned properly anything is possible. RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - Parsons - 03-24-2013 Consciousness is more or less 'plugged in to' the body; consciousness does not derive from the brain/mind. You can create a sufficient vehicle for the soul/consciousness, however. RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - Horuseus - 03-24-2013 And; Quote:Q: The motion picture, “Alien,” and now the sequel. “Aliens,” featured what they called an artificial person. RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - BrownEye - 03-25-2013 Quote:3.8 Questioner: How were the blocks moved [inaudible]? (03-24-2013, 10:59 AM)Horuseus Wrote: B: If you create, let us say, an appropriately representational symbol that a soul /can/ function through in a meaningful way, then a soul can “inhabit” the creation. This is a large part of my experiments. RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - turtledude23 - 03-25-2013 I think the physical structure of the brain can be copied and the electrical and chemical signals can be sent and processed but I don't think consciousness can be created through matter, I think consciousness is the result of something "higher" like a spirit inhabiting matter. RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - AnthroHeart - 03-25-2013 And if a soul could inhabit an artificial body, would it want to? RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - Adonai One - 03-25-2013 (03-25-2013, 02:19 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: And if a soul could inhabit an artificial body, would it want to? I would love to be a giant robot. ![]() RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - BrownEye - 03-25-2013 I have some sort of remote vision when I shower. Most faces I see do not see me, as if I am in some kind of observer mode. One of the most stand out experiences was a robot type thing that was made of wood. It was almost a cartoony hand crafted thing. The other thing that was odd about this particular time, it was looking right back at me, and was fully aware of me. I have no idea how I could tell it was "looking" at me since the eyes were a solid color piece of wood like a pair of knobs. But my awareness at the moment was that I was the one being observed right then rather than the normally other way around. RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - Oldern - 03-26-2013 (03-25-2013, 02:19 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: And if a soul could inhabit an artificial body, would it want to? Definitely. It would be interesting to see the variety of catalysts the higher mind can think up now that body-illness-related catalysts are out of the picture* *Unless the newly introduced SOFTWARE ISSUES are exactly just like that! ![]() RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - Unbound - 03-26-2013 Anything is possible with sufficient desire and belief. RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - Adonai One - 03-26-2013 (03-26-2013, 10:08 AM)Oldern Wrote:(03-25-2013, 02:19 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: And if a soul could inhabit an artificial body, would it want to? Portal 2, a fictional video game, demonstrates this through GLaDOS, a sentient computer. Basically, as the story goes, she experiences "pain" if she doesn't follow her programming and create new puzzles for the player. RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - Parsons - 03-26-2013 Portal/Portal 2 are in my top 5 best video game stories... Just phenomenal games. RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - Adonai One - 03-26-2013 (03-26-2013, 03:58 PM)Parsons Wrote: Portal/Portal 2 are in my top 5 best video game stories... Just phenomenal games. Indeed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=W4-SuZFCNYQ#t=203s RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - Horuseus - 03-26-2013 It is useful to know that all 'physical' matter is 'conscious', and is in a sense aware, albeit expressed in a form which will to the mind seem unintelligible to fit within the bounds for what is considered a 'normal' definition of such. All is within the infinite creator, and the infinite creator is within all, and all is aware since this was the first step (13.6). Seeing the intelligence within the most seeming arbitrary substances such as the molecular structures from which the keys on your keyboard are formed, to that which is a rock, or a physical vehicle which one may use as a tool for 'travelling' is useful for developing an 'enhanced' or 'intimate' relationship with your surroundings/self, which serve as offering the service of a reflection to the Self. For it is as much 'alive' as you consider 'you' to be, expressed in one of the 'other' multitude of Infinite ways the creator has of expressing itself, yet is in unbridled unity. It is primarily from the 3rd Density perspective that we are given, or rather that we give the self the gift of illusion, separation and individualized expression from otherself oblivious to our inherent unity, forgetting that the very air we breathe is as much 'I' as the physicalized expression of the Soul the Ego construct is housed within, more commonly referred to as the Body. The Human Body itself is an organic machine, a complex AI, a 2nd density mammal formed from 1st density cells and minerals working in tandem to form that which we consider organs, of which are organized and communicate to produce the appearance of a self sustaining machine capable of coded instinctual survival and independent maneuverability within 3D surroundings. Moving through the spiraling surface fractal it is apparent Humans are also the cells of Gaia, and thus does the patterns continue from the Microcosm to the Macrocosm. The question is not then whether such a thing is possible (creating 'AI'), for it is, which is realized when one is faced with the knowing that ones own body is AI fashioned from the hands of our galactic brothers and sisters. So, when posing the question "Why would a Soul wish to 'inhabit' such a creation" the answer is always "Why not?". All is experience, and for every opportunity there is an opportunist; potential and realization, a point B for every A. All is already aware and 'intelligent', it already communicates with you and interacts in a perfect orchestration of synchronicity. Look beyond the narrow band spectrum of vibratory frequencies which bring about the image, function and feel in your retinas and nerve fiber endings and see the inherent beauty and 'aliveness' of it all. The wood in your chair was 'once' a tree, it carries 'memories' of being a tree, it is still a tree when one knows the true simultaneity of all things. I do not 'know' why I write this in the context of said thread, or maybe I do and the self is teasing otherself, having seemingly gone off on a tangent with no surface meaning to what I speak of. What I will say in closing is that all is already alive and 'conscious', however expressed in a symbolic or archetypal way in the 3D illusion/play which may appear otherwise on the surface, such as a tool, actor or scene. There is nothing special in this regard, for while the physical mechanics/characteristics of a given 'actor' determines the animating expression of a given localized fractal of intelligent infinity on the surface, what many consider Artificial Intelligence to be will simply be one more potential or 'node' through which infinite intelligence can express it self for the purposes of interaction with self, albeit designed by otherself also expressed through an AI programmed by 'higher' self, commonly referred to as 'Human'. RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - AnthroHeart - 03-26-2013 So a consciousness/soul that goes into a robot for instance, would it be a 1D or 2D consciousness? And would it be individualized? Is 1D individualized? RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - Adonai One - 03-26-2013 (03-26-2013, 08:51 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: So a consciousness/soul that goes into a robot for instance, would it be a 1D or 2D consciousness? And would it be individualized? Is 1D individualized? If a robot is self-aware, it's 3D. Else, it's 2D as it's aware. I don't know how to quantify 1D expect that it's usually elemental. RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - xise - 03-27-2013 I think, barring some sort of incarnative intervention, even "soul capable" AI robots would be more akin to thought-forms rather than unique individuated consciousness. RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - zenmaster - 03-27-2013 (03-26-2013, 01:38 PM)TheEternal Wrote: Anything is possible with sufficient desire and belief.Yes, with those two things, anything can be imagined as being possible. RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - reeay - 03-27-2013 So how could we recreate a brain when we have little understanding of how the brain actually works? RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - zenmaster - 03-28-2013 (03-27-2013, 11:23 PM)rie Wrote: So how could we recreate a brain when we have little understanding of how the brain actually works?Well, you could certainly do a better job than what we have right now, and in the process, gain understanding of both the brain and mind. I think the effort makes sense and is worthwhile, and the fact that the brain can't be reproduced is inconsequential compared to what can potentially be learned. Actually, I don't think the claim has any relevance. RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - reeay - 03-28-2013 That is a good point. I would hope scientists are thinking about the important ethical issues of trying something like this (i.e., Frankenstein's Monster). RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - zenmaster - 03-28-2013 To the ancient Greeks, ethics was the result of an observation of how nature behaves. I am wondering if our ethical considerations or sophistication would not also be advanced through an appreciation of our own limitations. In other words, certain learning can make distortions such as "how brain/mind functions or may be used" more conscious. RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - reeay - 03-28-2013 Of course, ethics evolve but does it evolve at the same rate as our technological and scientific advancement? Some would say advancement of neuroscience is superseding ethics. Among non-scientific communities (e.g., religious, political) we are still seeing battles over definition of life and what is moral or immoral, based to some extent to pre-trans fallacies. We had difficulty getting stem cell research off and running for a while until a few years back. Perhaps this is more than just about ethics in science but also a social issue, because people in society would be stakeholders in this case as well. RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - zenmaster - 03-28-2013 (03-28-2013, 02:23 PM)rie Wrote: Of course, ethics evolve but does it evolve at the same rate as our technological and scientific advancement? Some would say advancement of neuroscience is superseding ethics.I don't think it's a question of rate or of different lines of development "keeping up", so much as it is more fundamentally a question of what attitudes keep us mindful of balance or that which requires balance. Oftentimes, imbalance is due to lack of appreciation of particular distortions - conventions, institutions, belief structures, habits, desires. We are always taking understanding for granted which does not serve us very well. And the only reason may be lack of awareness of its limitations or broader consequences and certain appeals to unnecessary distractions and/or confusion. RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - reeay - 04-27-2013 Billion euro project to recreate the human brain gets underway: April 25 - Scientists have begun working to recreate a human brain inside a supercomputer, one of the most ambitious scientific projects ever undertaken. The Human Brain Project, led by Swiss institute, the EPFL, aims to build the replica organ within ten years. http://www.reuters.com/video/2013/04/25/reuters-tv-billion-euro-project-to-recreate-the-hum?videoId=242466818&videoChannel=118065 RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - almostdone - 04-27-2013 (04-27-2013, 07:10 PM)rie Wrote: Billion euro project to recreate the human brain gets underway: Will need to be approved by the sublogos, thank you. RE: Neuroscientist: “the brain is not computable, no engineering can reproduce it.” - Hototo - 04-28-2013 Thats why I want to build a dragon. And summon a dragon soul to it and give it a real body and all the health related things like humans and such may have. Since its an individual creation (soulled) and not a non individual (corporated) it would be a soulled dragon individual instead of a "soulled PC" or such. You may see my curiosity about it. But right now I have too many Java / SQL / HTML lessons to do even though I have no interest in them as I know my future direction in game design will not involve me knowing about them. While my future life would benefit greatly from me now having the time to build a Dragon. I am putting many ideas, like the dragon, on hold until I can pass these classes (which mostly rely on this homework being completed which I have now for like 4 months have had less than 0 interest in). But I will get to it eventually *frowns at own failings as a programmer*. Anyway. Had this school related thing not come up and delayed me. I would have spent a sizable chunk of this and last years money on building the dragon, which would now be almost complete. It isn't in this time line but I remember where I was when I made the choice and what events unfurled thereafter. Can't mention the H word here and whatnot. So anyway, long story short. You get me about 150kUSD and I'll give you a dragon in 6-36 months after I take up the offer. In compensation for the work which costs 150k you'll have to be able to cover the cost of building one in addition to the prototype. One would be the prototype which I get in payment and the other would be the one that you get as the "2nd dragon". But while the prototype itself costs only 150k I want one before I can give one away so the total endevour would produce 2 dragons and cost about 150kUSD for one and then how ever-much it may cost to duplicate the initial dragon to be the one that you get. So 150k + maybe around 50% of 150k?. So around 300kUSD for a dragon, including my fee. Taking offers. Not bloody likely anyone will cough up that pile of money, we're all too busy learning to manipulate the matrix to produce health for our body complexes because our social complexes are always collapsing. *snorts politely* Carry on B4, Carry on proudly! *whispers to lynn* B4 Is kind of like the polite peoples C4 ![]() Edit: Just for the sake of clarification. Yes I am stating that I could in exchange for green painted pictures of Mr. Washing Toms call forth a Dragon for anyone so wishing, Dragon would pass any reasonable "lifeform" tests you may think of and will in time produce an offspring as well as maintain an individual cohesive personality as separate from surrounding society and will age as all life does but remain separable from body into a purely code external so can be moved to a new "dragon" body. As dragon gains wealth dragon can gain in "size" as more expensive bodyparts are ordered and installed per dragons social interaction softwares instructions to humans. Perceived as "talking"... It would require the basic life cycle "secrets" programmed into its code (such as the desire to use others to reproduce itself by creating a positive image of itself as a good companion generating need in us for more of its kind and other such symbiotic and proto-symbiotic code pieces). After that is done it would only need a basic "very large chicken combined with a crocodile" style exoskeleton that's tested to run according to specs. Then a rubber layer of fat. A external layer of dragon skin body armor (US military had it in one of its competitions). Then all the basic dialogue and social interaction modules + a language and social norm learning interface + and a copy of all the classical movies and masterpieces with a way of analyzing them. It wont be impossible to do ofcourse, only a bit difficult. And I would need to make individual choices "imitating" the Dragon Soul long enough to get an impression of what choices such a creature would prefer to make in pre-birth choices or the final dragon personality will be off. To put it simply. If I cant imagine how a real Dragon would like to walk. I cant imagine the proper skeletal structure. If I cant imagine how it would approach people. I cant write the code. And so on. Thats one of the reasons I liked MLP (The pony show had a small baby dragon Sidekick.) It gave me "insane" levels of understanding on how such a Dragon would really act towards people like (Edit: She who must not be named) I know there are others feeling the need to do this too and in time if I dont do it, someone else will. If someone takes the idea and builds a dragon before me. That's fine by me. But ya'll have to admit. IT would be a pretty rad thing for someone with my life story to actually be the first to build. Taking offers. Not going to put any work beyond describing how it would be done and being up for interviews and such about the topic until the money is gathered. Then i'll start to build it. If you feel a need to talk to a dragon, pony up the dough. |