Bring4th
Question about user statistics - Printable Version

+- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Bring4th Community (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=16)
+--- Forum: Olio (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: Question about user statistics (/showthread.php?tid=5593)



Question about user statistics - Cyan - 09-29-2012

I came upon a thought.

Does anyone over here have any ideas on how many hits a day does b4 and L/L Research as it approaches 2012-21-12 and it being one of the premier channeled materials. I think the interest should be, in some level, astronomical, considering the whole 2012 hype and what not. Or is there a kind of lull before the storm before people take an interest in the date like before elections like 2 weeks before the date and billions of people come to the "premier western religious material concerning this new age year change festival" and what not.

considering all the illuminati hype how could people NOT Make this into a huge * religious seromony and that brings a massive amount of interest into these forums approaching "the date".

any ideas on user statistics as we approach that or are we remaining at almost near baseline?


RE: Question about user statistics - zenmaster - 09-29-2012

Did you come to this website because of 2012 hype?


RE: Question about user statistics - Brittany - 09-29-2012

An F bomb! Yay!


RE: Question about user statistics - Cyan - 09-29-2012

(09-29-2012, 02:23 PM)zenmaster Wrote: Did you come to this website because of 2012 hype?

I was around the cassiopaea group back in 2001 or 2002. I've been around the spiritual matrix for a while friend =)

My first contact with Ra was in the form of a floating eye at the corner of my room that i draw to look like the eye of Ra at about age 7ish.. or so.. not sure cant rememeber that age so specific Smile. I was interested in Ra before i even know of the 2012 hype, or even of the relevance of the date. To me, i am skeptical if the 2012 hype group is even physically really existing or not, considering, i was aware of the Ra and its spiritual significance before i was aware of the date associated group, at all. So. To me, your insinuation of the hype around the date is funny Smile

I would have been snippy about it but i think i'm still carrying left over coherance from the previous reply.

Chill Mastah-Zen! I am Butt A. A Tinny Grassy Hoopa'h!


RE: Question about user statistics - zenmaster - 09-29-2012

(09-29-2012, 02:33 PM)Brittany Lynn Wrote: An F bomb! Yay!
We're all libs here.




RE: Question about user statistics - Cyan - 09-29-2012

(09-29-2012, 02:33 PM)Brittany Lynn Wrote: An F bomb! Yay!

Good god, removed it when i noticed it, my apologies and thanks for pointing out Smile


RE: Question about user statistics - zenmaster - 09-29-2012

So you would say " think the interest should be, in some level, astronomical, considering the whole 2012 hype and what not." But would exclude yourself and become offended. Can someone say "catalyst".


RE: Question about user statistics - Cyan - 09-29-2012

(09-29-2012, 02:38 PM)zenmaster Wrote: So you would say " think the interest should be, in some level, astronomical, considering the whole 2012 hype and what not." But would exclude yourself and become offended. Can someone say "catalyst".

Perhapse i have mistakenly stated my intent.

I'll rephrase.

Is there any meaningful way to gauge interest in the b4 forum in terms of physical user statistics.

Less interested in your definitions of when someone says words Smile


RE: Question about user statistics - Bring4th_Austin - 09-29-2012

There's been steady curved growth since 2008 in threads and posts (not traffic).

For example, taking thread counts alone, in 2010 there were ~1100 new threads created, in 2011 there were ~1300 new threads, and we have already passed 1300 in 2012. As for post counts, <23,000 posts made in 2010, ~35,000 posts made in 2011, and perhaps 30,000 made so far in 2012.

These are pretty rough estimates because the chart I'm looking at is a hard copy and pretty difficult to read accurately, but it's definitely accurate enough to give you a sense of the activity increase on Bring4th the past couple years.

As for general traffic, I have no real numbers, but I would say that the number of counted unregistered guests browsing the forum at any given time has increased significantly since I started participating here.

Currently there are 96,076 posts. I'm pretty sure the Mayans were just predicting Bring4th's 100,000th post.


RE: Question about user statistics - Cyan - 09-30-2012

(09-29-2012, 05:37 PM)Bring4th_Austin Wrote: There's been steady curved growth since 2008 in threads and posts (not traffic).

For example, taking thread counts alone, in 2010 there were ~1100 new threads created, in 2011 there were ~1300 new threads, and we have already passed 1300 in 2012. As for post counts, <23,000 posts made in 2010, ~35,000 posts made in 2011, and perhaps 30,000 made so far in 2012.

These are pretty rough estimates because the chart I'm looking at is a hard copy and pretty difficult to read accurately, but it's definitely accurate enough to give you a sense of the activity increase on Bring4th the past couple years.

As for general traffic, I have no real numbers, but I would say that the number of counted unregistered guests browsing the forum at any given time has increased significantly since I started participating here.

Currently there are 96,076 posts. I'm pretty sure the Mayans were just predicting Bring4th's 100,000th post.

Thank you.

I'm expecting "the" user flood to appear on or around lateish november.

Thanks for the statistics Smile


RE: Question about user statistics - Shin'Ar - 09-30-2012

(09-29-2012, 02:35 PM)Cyan Wrote: My first contact with Ra was in the form of a floating eye at the corner of my room that i draw to look like the eye of Ra at about age 7ish.. or so.. not sure cant rememeber that age so specific Smile. I was interested in Ra before i even know of the 2012 hype, or even of the relevance of the date.


Cyan,

you say you were interested in Ra.

You do know that Ra is just the name that this specific group of beings chose. It is not the God Ra of Khem worship.

With regard to the numbers seeking, I would also point out that the great majority of the human population has no interest in such things and live their self gratifying lifestyles in basic ignorance of anything that we speak of here.


RE: Question about user statistics - Cyan - 09-30-2012

(09-30-2012, 07:49 AM)ShinAr Wrote: I would also point out that the great majority of the human population has no interest in such things and live their self gratifying lifestyles in basic ignorance of anything that we speak of here.

That is your perogative to believe Smile


RE: Question about user statistics - Shin'Ar - 10-01-2012

(09-30-2012, 04:33 PM)Cyan Wrote:
(09-30-2012, 07:49 AM)ShinAr Wrote: I would also point out that the great majority of the human population has no interest in such things and live their self gratifying lifestyles in basic ignorance of anything that we speak of here.

That is your perogative to believe Smile

You disagree?

Do you think that most of the human population is enlightened and no longer on the right hand path?


RE: Question about user statistics - Cyan - 10-01-2012

(10-01-2012, 03:34 AM)ShinAr Wrote:
(09-30-2012, 04:33 PM)Cyan Wrote:
(09-30-2012, 07:49 AM)ShinAr Wrote: I would also point out that the great majority of the human population has no interest in such things and live their self gratifying lifestyles in basic ignorance of anything that we speak of here.

That is your perogative to believe Smile

You disagree?

Do you think that most of the human population is enlightened and no longer on the right hand path?

I wouldnt know, i only know around 15-20 people "well" and the rest is my projection of what i believe the other selves are doing in relation to what i am doing and the background story for that.

I would start by saying that i don't believe in the real concept of "most of the human population" I have no way of saying if other humans are real, or my imagination, especially beyond the closest few.

To put it in "Ra'ite"

"The veil prevents me from knowing the answer."



RE: Question about user statistics - AnthroHeart - 10-01-2012

(10-01-2012, 08:23 AM)Cyan Wrote: I would start by saying that i don't believe in the real concept of "most of the human population" I have no way of saying if other humans are real, or my imagination, especially beyond the closest few.

To put it in "Ra'ite"

"The veil prevents me from knowing the answer."

I don't know, but I feel pretty real.


RE: Question about user statistics - Cyan - 10-01-2012

I dont know, i mean its a pretty tall order to define "real"


RE: Question about user statistics - AnthroHeart - 10-01-2012

You're right Cyan, because my dream last night felt realer than this world.


RE: Question about user statistics - Cyan - 10-01-2012

(10-01-2012, 11:18 AM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: You're right Cyan, because my dream last night felt realer than this world.

You ever get that feeling when you fall asleep that you transition without ever "falling asleep" into a dream world and then transition back without "falling asleep" that is to say, you dont at any point fade to the usual "black visual field" but that it feels like the same people that you live with in real life interact with you in the dream world but as if they are the real people but different viewpoints (more universal and less personal)

Anyway. After 2 years of near non stop weirdness which culminated in walking into a movie set that is a mock hallucination by a movie star as he is dying or some such after a particularly strong trip. I ended up looking at that scene(cant go into details of the scene because it would violate NDA's but i can link it into the funny movie things once its available and explain then) from a rock overlooking the bridge and waving as one of the background people. All the actors were dressed up in this dream timey 1800's clothing and it was supposed to be a hallucination.

But the scene is in a movie and i got paid for being there and i have pictures of it and i was coming down from a meditative lsd trip in the astral during the shooting.

How do you explain something like that to random people, when the trip itself consisted of me dying and the movie consisted of me participating in this filming and the coming down consisted of the bus trip home.

"have you seen a movie flash before your eyes"

"yeah dude, heck, i had a minor side role in one! that ended up being filmed and put on the big screen!"

"wait... what?"

Edit:

To Clarify: I*m not sure if you gemi wolf, as an entity, are a separate entity from me as the me that slept in the bed last night so therefore, i'm not sure if you are "real" because i'm not sure if real and unreal have measurable differences or not. That is to say, i have no idea if such a thing as "unreal" exists, i think unmanifest (lacking physical mass) exists but that is as unreal as it gets. dunno.