Little Work in Consciousness in Higher Density - Printable Version +- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums) +-- Forum: Bring4th Studies (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Strictly Law of One Material (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Little Work in Consciousness in Higher Density (/showthread.php?tid=16894) |
Little Work in Consciousness in Higher Density - AnthroHeart - 02-03-2019 How does one experience without doing work in consciousness? How would one work, if it is not in consciousness? Quote:48.6 ▶ Questioner: Thank you. That cleared it up very well. A very important point. Can you tell me how positive and negative polarizations in fourth and fifth density are used to cause work in consciousness? RE: Little Work in Consciousness in Higher Density - Sacred Fool - 02-03-2019 IGW, you may be just getting tripped up by the terminology. It may help to think of the steps of light. Each density is an opportunity to move higher up that staircase, that is, to learn to accept denser, less watered down light. In one sense this is "work in consciousness." But as I read the phrase "work in consciousness" above, it means something else. I read it as a reference to the 3d experience of working beyond the veil while still living on this side of it. In other words, the conscious 3d personality-mind becomes transparent enough to spirit so that the two can work together to bring more light to this planet. In that sense, 4d & 5d don't do that sort of "work in consciousness" because there is no veil in those densities. They don't have to do this strange thing we do of blindly creating an individual bridge of consciousness connecting the incarnate, veiled self with the Higher Self, spirit guides and all that jazz. RE: Little Work in Consciousness in Higher Density - xise - 02-03-2019 I think it's more of a matter of work/time. 3D on Earth is intense, with some people polarizing 51% within 25k-75k year cycles, but 4D is typically millions of years long in which many approach purity of service at least for positive of 95%+ polarity. So taking millions of years to approach 95% is a lot less work than taking 75,000 years to approach 51%. The work in 3d is a lot quicker, but there is work in higher densities just of a different and slower in terms of time. RE: Little Work in Consciousness in Higher Density - anagogy - 02-03-2019 (02-03-2019, 02:29 PM)IndigoGeminiWolf Wrote: How does one experience without doing work in consciousness? I think you have define some things, to put them in perspective. First off, they don't say that work is not done in higher densities, they just say it is less work than third density. This is a relative statement. What is it relative to? So you have to consider some variables: variable A) length of time spent working and variable B) the type of difficulty of the work being done So for the first variable: length of time: 75,000 years is a an incredibly short amount of time compared to the other densities. Also, the difficulty of being a 3rd density is pretty rough, I think we can mostly agree on. There was a point in the past, when there was no veil, where the work in 3rd density was also very little, and similarly, the length of 3rd density was corresponding longer as a consequence. Eons according to Ra. It was easier to be in 3rd density without the veil, because little work was being done, so the polarity of potential was built up very slowly. Introducing the veil shortened and vivified 3rd density because the work got so much harder because you introduced enough separation/distortion to allow for a whole other class to play as: STS, which provided intense lessons for the STO on the plane (likewise for the STS beings). So you see, it is simply a trade off: do a lot of intense work, very quickly, or do the same amount of work but over a much longer and diluted period of time. My belief is their statement was relative to the veiled conditions of 3rd density life now. edit: Lol, I didn't read all the responses, but I see now xise basically said the exact same thing. My response wasn't necessary. Oh well. |