![]() |
The bible - Printable Version +- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums) +-- Forum: Bring4th Community (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=16) +--- Forum: Olio (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: The bible (/showthread.php?tid=12371) |
The bible - Minyatur - 01-12-2016 Was thinking about the bible, which is the first "spiritual" book I've read and was thinking it could be useful to re-read. So I was wondering do others see good points in this book? What I see that is good in the bible 1. Oneness is expressed at various points throughout it, there also are images portrayed to illustrate the OIC and allow a connection to occur within people. 2. A lot of archetypes are portrayed throughout the book in many ways. Just reading imprints them within self in some manner. (I think this may be the strongest point, but well you know.. Oneness has to take first spot.) 3. It gives of a picture of reality with quite various colors. 4. Gives good guidance to start of in spiritual awakening. 5. Gives information about negative entities and their ways of work. Teaches how to guard yourself and also gives hindsight about why you attract them. One could also easily make out of it that there is misguidance in the book. 6. It is the words of many channeled entities and wanderers over a thousand years. 7. Although there is misguidance, misguidance is quite the effective mirror upon self. This book made me polarize much more positively than the Ra material did, although the Ra material yields greater potential. Truth be told!... although re-reading it at this point would never create the effective mirror it was as my first gateway. About point 6, right below are the authors. An interesting question to ask of Ra, would've been questioning the polarity and intent of each author, and also the same in regards to the period where each book was written for the authors with many books. Quote:Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy = Moses - 1400 B.C. So we got from 1400 BC to 90 AD, and as you can see there's been lot of efforts put into it. I think an open-minded person that knows the book is not absolute truth and conveys messages in images shouldn't be too scared of misguidance although one can find disheartening what people make out of portions of it without any kind of whole picture of what is in it. I think there is a lot of positive messages, with many deeper meanings to them. Of course the ways of working of positive entities are somewhat limited in giving off information as to not infringe upon free will but I am sure it also makes them try harder to make something worthwhile out of what they can give. Like I said above, I think the main strong side of the bible is the portraying of archetypes made into stories, characters, etc. RE: The bible - AnthroHeart - 01-12-2016 The Book of Enoch is missing from the Bible. RE: The bible - Kaaron - 01-12-2016 This is something I wrote and posted on Facebook. It was written with a mainstream audience in mind so terms like "devil" can be replaced with "orion group" etc. -------------- I tried getting an explanation from a Jehovah's Witness elder, Mormon missionaries and even the branch president of their local ward about something in the Bible but none of them could fathom the heresy. I thought it must be worth considering, so maybe one of my friends will get it or take something away from it. There are two types of contact with "God" in the Bible. One is a visionary kind where the Prophet is "in the spirit", sees winged creatures and lampstands n s***...then there's the contact with fire i.e. the burning bush. One contact inspires metaphorical vision of things to come through inspired thought, the other requires blood sacrifice and complete obedience or death is the result...not just for you but your whole family n even community or city depending on the transgression or mood of said "god". There is a God that is loving, kind, long suffering, joyful, impartial etc. Then there is a god that is vengeful, jealous and not to be f***** with or fire and sulphur will rain down on you. Now...most will agree that God is perfect. That God knows all and loves all creation equally...That we are all manifestations of the original source and that God is all things. Why then, would God tell a group of people to kill another group of men, women and children, take their land and move on to the next defiant city? Would something that knew it was everything and perfect not love all parts of itself? Anything less than total acceptance of self would be self denial; something imperfect and impossible for a perfect perspective. The jealous god builds earthly kingdoms by force, a complete contradiction to the teaching of Jesus to build up treasures in heaven. He also said that his kingdom was no part of this world. The clincher for me is this: 2 Corinthians 3:7-8 Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone, came with glory, so that the Israelites could not look steadily at the face of Moses because of its glory, transitory though it was, 8 will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious? Why were the 10 commandments called a ministry that brought death? Something that was negative was still so glorious that it made Moses' face shine so that they couldn't look at him. The god that appears to Moses uses fire and makes things shine. The bible also says "the devil keeps turning himself into an angel of light". What was light in Moses' day? FIRE. The devil can't inspire like the true God, or representatives of it, so it uses fire and parlour tricks to trick people to do f***** up s*** like kill every man woman and child. It still does...look at Gaza. RE: The bible - Minyatur - 01-12-2016 The bible gives out that it has mixed influences indirectly but also misguides in saying that each word of it is Truth. That is a thought that is injected and takes root in the mind. RE: The bible - Kaaron - 01-13-2016 I feel like the contacts spoken of in the LOO that allowed the Orion group to gain a foothold with the concept of the holy war were Abraham and then Moses. I feel that Joseph was a confederation contact. RE: The bible - Ankh - 01-13-2016 (01-12-2016, 10:02 PM)Elros Tar-Minyatur Wrote: An interesting question to ask of Ra, would've been questioning the polarity and intent of each author, and also the same in regards to the period where each book was written for the authors with many books. I don't think that Ra would answer this question due to infringement of our Free Will. They were very protective of it. |