Bring4th
lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Printable Version

+- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Bring4th Community (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=16)
+--- Forum: Olio (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: lawful neutral chaotic discussion (/showthread.php?tid=11381)

Pages: 1 2 3


lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Bluebell - 07-08-2015

i find these D&D alignment things very fascinating.

which alignment is the most harvestable or balanced? which is ur favorite and why? do u wish urs was different?

i think true neutral is most balanced.

[Image: Good_eba6e5_889811.jpg]


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Bluebell - 07-08-2015

[Image: 937119_700b.jpg]


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-08-2015

At this point of my life right now, I'm probably chaotic good. I've been researching some radical socialist ideas lately (radical as in extreme). By the way, I think that that the Firefly chaotic evil is very, very sexy.  Blush


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Bluebell - 07-09-2015

what would u say Bernie Sanders is?


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Minyatur - 07-09-2015

I've been told by a friend that I was chaotic neutral, but the test gave me true neutral.


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 02:45 AM)Bluebell Wrote: what would u say Bernie Sanders is?

He's a democratic socialist. I don't believe in democracy anymore. I believe in a socialist dictatorship. But not a Marxist dictatorship. I don't want to say too much because what I believe is very controversial.


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 02:52 AM)Minyatur Wrote: I've been told by a friend that I was chaotic neutral, but the test gave me true neutral.

Where can you take the test?


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 02:52 AM)Minyatur Wrote: I've been told by a friend that I was chaotic neutral, but the test gave me true neutral.

You seem more like lawful neutral.


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Minyatur - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 02:55 AM)Lighthead Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:52 AM)Minyatur Wrote: I've been told by a friend that I was chaotic neutral, but the test gave me true neutral.

Where can you take the test?

Spaced posted this : http://easydamus.com/character.html


in this thread : http://bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=11372


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Bluebell - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 02:54 AM)Lighthead Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:45 AM)Bluebell Wrote: what would u say Bernie Sanders is?

He's a democratic socialist. I don't believe in democracy anymore. I believe in a socialist dictatorship. But not a Marxist dictatorship. I don't want to say too much because what I believe is very controversial.

benevolent dictatorship? please tell me more.


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Bluebell - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 02:52 AM)Minyatur Wrote: I've been told by a friend that I was chaotic neutral, but the test gave me true neutral.


u seem true neutral to me...


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Bluebell - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 02:59 AM)Bluebell Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:54 AM)Lighthead Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:45 AM)Bluebell Wrote: what would u say Bernie Sanders is?

He's a democratic socialist. I don't believe in democracy anymore. I believe in a socialist dictatorship. But not a Marxist dictatorship. I don't want to say too much because what I believe is very controversial.

benevolent dictatorship? please tell me more.

and i meant what alignment is Bernie?


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Karl - 07-09-2015

http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd%2Fdnd%2F20001222b

I got true neutral. I don't give a f*** about anything.


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Minyatur - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 02:58 AM)Lighthead Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:52 AM)Minyatur Wrote: I've been told by a friend that I was chaotic neutral, but the test gave me true neutral.

You seem more like lawful neutral.

I act very diffently depending on where I'm at and with whom I'm with, let's say that on that day he had particular reasons to be right with the chaotic part haha

I'd say on this forum I am very lawful neutral. In real life I am true neutral. With close friends I am very chaotic neutral, chaotic neutral being the one when I probably am most myself.


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Minyatur - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 03:08 AM)Karl Wrote: http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd%2Fdnd%2F20001222b

I got true neutral. I don't give a f*** about anything.

I don't give a f*** about not giving a f***... wait, I do give a f***?


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 02:59 AM)Bluebell Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:54 AM)Lighthead Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:45 AM)Bluebell Wrote: what would u say Bernie Sanders is?

He's a democratic socialist. I don't believe in democracy anymore. I believe in a socialist dictatorship. But not a Marxist dictatorship. I don't want to say too much because what I believe is very controversial.

benevolent dictatorship? please tell me more.

I believe that elected leaders are not really experts. I believe that a democracy can exist in a transition to a dictatorship. But leaders need to prove that they are capable of leading. Doctors and pilots are not elected. Therefore leaders should work their way to a position of leadership. That's about as much as I can say without getting kicked off this board since the nuances of what I believe are very, very controversial.


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 03:02 AM)Bluebell Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:59 AM)Bluebell Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:54 AM)Lighthead Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:45 AM)Bluebell Wrote: what would u say Bernie Sanders is?

He's a democratic socialist. I don't believe in democracy anymore. I believe in a socialist dictatorship. But not a Marxist dictatorship. I don't want to say too much because what I believe is very controversial.

benevolent dictatorship? please tell me more.

and i meant what alignment is Bernie?

Bernie seems like lawful good to me.


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Minyatur - 07-09-2015

I picture democracy as a play, very entertaining if you like the genre. (I don't)


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 03:08 AM)Karl Wrote: http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd%2Fdnd%2F20001222b

I got true neutral. I don't give a f*** about anything.

The test tells me that I'm lawful good. But I was just sort of guessing since I haven't been in a lot of those situations.


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Bluebell - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 03:13 AM)Lighthead Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:59 AM)Bluebell Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:54 AM)Lighthead Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:45 AM)Bluebell Wrote: what would u say Bernie Sanders is?

He's a democratic socialist. I don't believe in democracy anymore. I believe in a socialist dictatorship. But not a Marxist dictatorship. I don't want to say too much because what I believe is very controversial.

benevolent dictatorship? please tell me more.

I believe that elected leaders are not really experts. I believe that a democracy can exist in a transition to a dictatorship. But leaders need to prove that they are capable of leading. Doctors and pilots are not elected. Therefore leaders should work their way to a position of leadership. That's about as much as I can say without getting kicked off this board since the nuances of what I believe are very, very controversial.

i agree w u.

they can't kick anyone out for having opinions Tongue tell me more.


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Bluebell - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 03:15 AM)Minyatur Wrote: I picture democracy as a play, very entertaining if you like the genre. (I don't)

it's a play of idiots. down w democracy!


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Bluebell - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 03:08 AM)Karl Wrote: http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd%2Fdnd%2F20001222b

I got true neutral. I don't give a f*** about anything.

i give a f*** but always to suit my own ends.


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 02:59 AM)Minyatur Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:55 AM)Lighthead Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:52 AM)Minyatur Wrote: I've been told by a friend that I was chaotic neutral, but the test gave me true neutral.

Where can you take the test?

Spaced posted this : http://easydamus.com/character.html


in this thread : http://bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=11372

I got lawful good (again) human monk, level 4. My highest score is wisdom at 17. Does anybody know what level 4 means? I couldn't find it anywhere. My second highest is intelligence (16). And third highest is charisma (13).


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 04:06 AM)Bluebell Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 03:13 AM)Lighthead Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:59 AM)Bluebell Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:54 AM)Lighthead Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:45 AM)Bluebell Wrote: what would u say Bernie Sanders is?

He's a democratic socialist. I don't believe in democracy anymore. I believe in a socialist dictatorship. But not a Marxist dictatorship. I don't want to say too much because what I believe is very controversial.

benevolent dictatorship? please tell me more.

I believe that elected leaders are not really experts. I believe that a democracy can exist in a transition to a dictatorship. But leaders need to prove that they are capable of leading. Doctors and pilots are not elected. Therefore leaders should work their way to a position of leadership. That's about as much as I can say without getting kicked off this board since the nuances of what I believe are very, very controversial.

i agree w u.

they can't kick anyone out for having opinions Tongue tell me more.

Trust me, it gets very controversial. I might violate a guideline or more. I might even offend you for all I know. I don't want to get kicked out of here. I still like it here.


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 04:07 AM)Bluebell Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 03:15 AM)Minyatur Wrote: I picture democracy as a play, very entertaining if you like the genre. (I don't)

it's a play of idiots. down w democracy!

Wow, that was fast! Lol.


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Bluebell - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 04:36 AM)Lighthead Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 04:06 AM)Bluebell Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 03:13 AM)Lighthead Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:59 AM)Bluebell Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:54 AM)Lighthead Wrote: He's a democratic socialist. I don't believe in democracy anymore. I believe in a socialist dictatorship. But not a Marxist dictatorship. I don't want to say too much because what I believe is very controversial.

benevolent dictatorship? please tell me more.

I believe that elected leaders are not really experts. I believe that a democracy can exist in a transition to a dictatorship. But leaders need to prove that they are capable of leading. Doctors and pilots are not elected. Therefore leaders should work their way to a position of leadership. That's about as much as I can say without getting kicked off this board since the nuances of what I believe are very, very controversial.

i agree w u.

they can't kick anyone out for having opinions Tongue tell me more.

Trust me, it gets very controversial. I might violate a guideline or more. I might even offend you for all I know. I don't want to get kicked out of here. I still like it here.

don't be shy. it truly can't violate guidelines unless u personally attack a board member. own ur opinions!


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Shemaya - 07-09-2015

I have no idea what this means, but I got neutral good, based on the questionnaire that Karl posted. What does this mean Tongue


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Minyatur - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 12:52 PM)Shemaya Wrote: I have no idea what this means, but I got neutral good, based on the questionnaire that Karl posted. What does this mean Tongue

http://easydamus.com/neutralgood.html


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Jade - 07-09-2015

I tied with neutral and chaotic good, which I feel is pretty accurate. I'm having trouble coming to grips with the (current) accuracy of my husband's assessment. Neutral evil? According to that site...

The Neutral Evil Code

The personal code of a neutral evil character may look like this:

1. You shall lie to advance yourself.
2. You shall harm the innocent to advance yourself.
3. You shall kill to advance yourself.
4. You shall not aid the weak.
5. You shall honor those who are stronger.
6. You shall follow the law only to advance yourself.
7. You shall betray friends, family, community, and nation to advance yourself.
8. You shall not aid those who protect the weak.
9. You shall not show mercy to enemies.
10. You shall seek unlimited power over others.

Ten Neutral Evil Signs of Weakness
Likewise, a neutral evil character may consider the following as signs of weakness. A sign of weakness indicates that the character is straying from the cruel tenets of the neutral evil philosophy. This list is given in the order of least severe infraction to most severe.

1. Failing to show malice or inflict pain upon an innocent when it would be pleasurable to do so.
2. Not challenging a clearly weak leader for leadership.
3. Keeping your word when doing so would interfere with personal gain.
4. Refusing to commit cruel act that would harm your enemy or rival when appropriate.
5. Making a sacrifice to help another when not important to your survival.
6. Failing to commit cruel acts that are in your best interest.
7. Refusing to kill for personal gain or wealth.
8. Turning down a chance to gain power or wealth.
9. Showing mercy to one who is opposed to you or your cause.
10. Aiding the servants of Goodness.

It's interesting, though, because this is actually probably an accurate picture of his alignment when he was a teenager. He was involved in violent gangs and committed many thefts. Then he a few several angry years as a drunk berating people on the internet. In fact, #1 on the "signs of weakness" list almost makes me chuckle, because that indeed used to be one of his pastimes. He's even lamented the loss of the joy he used to get being snarky all the time. He also once told me that I taught him that it was possible to get pleasure from helping people and being nice and doing good. So, while *maybe* 1/5th of those might be applicable to him today, most of them are decidedly NOT accurate, and I find it interesting that his self-image still reflects this self and not his current self. The second highest he got was neutral good, like me, which makes sense because I see us as very alike. But my personal assessment putting it all together I believe would label him, within the confines of the system, as a chaotic neutral.


RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-09-2015

(07-09-2015, 04:42 AM)Bluebell Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 04:36 AM)Lighthead Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 04:06 AM)Bluebell Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 03:13 AM)Lighthead Wrote:
(07-09-2015, 02:59 AM)Bluebell Wrote: benevolent dictatorship? please tell me more.

I believe that elected leaders are not really experts. I believe that a democracy can exist in a transition to a dictatorship. But leaders need to prove that they are capable of leading. Doctors and pilots are not elected. Therefore leaders should work their way to a position of leadership. That's about as much as I can say without getting kicked off this board since the nuances of what I believe are very, very controversial.

i agree w u.

they can't kick anyone out for having opinions Tongue tell me more.

Trust me, it gets very controversial. I might violate a guideline or more. I might even offend you for all I know. I don't want to get kicked out of here. I still like it here.

don't be shy. it truly can't violate guidelines unless u personally attack a board member. own ur opinions!

I'd have to check the guidelines, but I'm almost positive that it violates at least one guideline.