![]() |
2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - Printable Version +- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums) +-- Forum: Bring4th Community (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=16) +--- Forum: Olio (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" (/showthread.php?tid=10272) |
2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - Jim Kent + - 01-11-2015 Greetings sisters and brothers, Firstly, I would like to discuss how we number our years... I personally find it inappropriate that we number our years based on the birth of a single graduated wanderer, namely Jehoshua. I doubt whether this would ever catch-on due to the popularity of Christianity, but I feel that it would be appropriate to start our historical numbering system based on when Gaia became a 4th density planet ... With this start point, 2013 would equate to year 0000 of 4th density, this time around, with 2014 being 0001 and 2015 being 0002. Secondly, I would like to discuss, what we name 4th density Humanity... 3rd density has named itself "Homo Sapiens", and I personally feel that fully 4th density Humanity deserves an appropriate scientific denomination. In the sci-fi series "The Tomorrow People" ( both the original British version of the 70's and the recent US version ) the new Humanity was named "Homo Superior", with their ability to communicate telepathically, self tele-transport and telekinesis. What do you think we should call 4th density Humanity? EDIT: It's a testament to how drunk I was when I posted this, I titled this post 2014... forgetting this it is actually 2015! ![]() RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - AnthroHeart - 01-11-2015 Homo Galactus or Homo Galacticus. RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - Minyatur - 01-11-2015 Come on, Jehoshua is having a whole civilization number years around the birth of that incarnation. Why do you want to take that away from him ![]() And why do you think that earth went into 4D? RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - Jim Kent + - 01-11-2015 (01-11-2015, 06:03 PM)Minyatur Wrote: Come on, Jehoshua is having a whole civilization number years around the birth of that incarnation. Why do you want to take that away from him Greetings Minyatau, I do not want to take anything away from anyone, I just feel that this would be a more appropriate and universal method of measuring the passage of time. Not every one is a Christian! I believe that Gaia became 4th density because of my decade long study of the Confederation's philosophy and message. RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - AnthroHeart - 01-11-2015 Yeah, I see no evidence that Earth is 4D. It's supposed to be 100-700 years for the transition according to Ra. RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - Jim Kent + - 01-11-2015 (01-11-2015, 06:21 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: Yeah, I see no evidence that Earth is 4D. It's supposed to be 100-700 years for the transition according to Ra. From my studies of the messages brought to us by L/L, I have read that Q'uo has since revised this time period to 100 - 300 years. I try not to confuse Gaia's transition to 4th density with Humanity's transition to 4th density, whilst they are intimately interconnected, one does not necessarily equate to the other... What I mean by this, is that Gaia would transition into a 4th density planetary entity regardless of whether or not any Humans make it to 4th! RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - Stranger - 01-11-2015 One thing to note is that Jesus is not a "graduated wanderer," but one of the non-evolving beings created by Logos to run the Universe. In this he is different from, say, the Buddha, although their message is the same - because the Truth is still the Truth, no matter its source. RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - Jim Kent + - 01-11-2015 (01-11-2015, 06:34 PM)Stranger Wrote: One thing to note is that Jesus is not a "graduated wanderer," but one of the non-evolving beings created by Logos to run the Universe. In this he is different from, say, the Buddha, although their message is the same - because the Truth is still the Truth, no matter its source. I recall Q'uo stating that Jehoshua, after incarnating as a Human being, graduated to 5th density with "his" Social Memory Complex... That sounds like evolution to me! ![]() RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - Stranger - 01-11-2015 That was an error. RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - Minyatur - 01-11-2015 (01-11-2015, 06:21 PM)Jim Kent + Wrote:(01-11-2015, 06:03 PM)Minyatur Wrote: Come on, Jehoshua is having a whole civilization number years around the birth of that incarnation. Why do you want to take that away from him I was just messing around. I just thought that if I had a whole civilization number years around the birth of one of my incarnation, I'd find that funny ![]() About 4D this is interresting, I hadn't thought of that. Somehow I don't feel so much connected to this sphere, I feel like I have been wandering for too long and I ought to become a sphere myself. I seem tired of trying to provide catalysts and tired of feeling responsible of the pain of others when I just want to share my understanding with them that their pain would vanish. I feel like I'd rather just be that which provides a place for counciousness to grow in love that they work among themselves to grow toward harmony. I guess I should try to connect more deeply with Gaia. RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - darklight - 01-15-2015 For the ones who ascend: homo superior For the ones who stay: homo degeneramos idiotos RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - AnthroHeart - 01-15-2015 It will be nice to see physically with my 3rd eye, and into multi-dimensions. RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - Stranger - 01-15-2015 My SO suggests “Homo Humilis” or “Homo Coniunctis” - I'm on board with either. RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - Bluebell - 01-16-2015 Homo Huggis RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - AnthroHeart - 01-16-2015 (01-16-2015, 09:04 AM)Bluebell Wrote: Homo Huggis Plenty of hugs in 4D. Energetic hugs too from a distance. RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - Bluebell - 01-16-2015 exactly. it's like Carealot RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - AnthroHeart - 01-16-2015 (01-16-2015, 12:48 PM)Bluebell Wrote: exactly. it's like Carealot That's so sweet. ![]() Except the bad guys are truly evil. RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - Bluebell - 01-16-2015 professor coldheart isn't that fuzzy either RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - AnthroHeart - 01-16-2015 (01-16-2015, 01:33 PM)Bluebell Wrote: professor coldheart isn't that fuzzy either I forgot about him. I have the DVD's that I need to watch again. RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - Jim Kent + - 03-07-2017 Last night I came up with a contender for the name of the new Human species, i.e. 4th Density... I went from the new Human to Newman and then to Numan So that's my suggestion to name those of us that constitute 4th density Numanity Welcome to the Numan Race! ![]() L & L Jim RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - 1109 - 03-07-2017 (03-07-2017, 07:15 AM)Jim Kent + Wrote: Last night I came up with a contender for the name of the new Human species, i.e. 4th Density... ![]() The face of future mankind! RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - Infinite Unity - 03-07-2017 (03-07-2017, 07:15 AM)Jim Kent + Wrote: Last night I came up with a contender for the name of the new Human species, i.e. 4th Density... You should read 1984. Newspeak is all the rage these days! RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - Raz - 03-07-2017 Nu means Now in Swedish. FYI ![]() RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - Infinite Unity - 03-08-2017 (03-07-2017, 09:41 AM)Raz Wrote: Nu means Now in Swedish. FYI Haha! I just read 1984, so that came to mind, when I saw this. I was just playing around mostly. RE: 2014 and "Homo Sapiens" - sjel - 03-09-2017 I propose "No Homo" |