+- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Bring4th Community (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=16)
+--- Forum: Olio (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: Here we go again (wikipedia) (/showthread.php?tid=6477)
RE: Here we go again (wikipedia) - Jade - 10-16-2015
I'm cool with it.
RE: Here we go again (wikipedia) - The_Tired_Philosopher - 10-16-2015
(10-16-2015, 10:45 AM)Adonai One Wrote: I believe it is relevant to say that the material at hand claims there is no "right or wrong," which can be thusly and intuitively interpreted as it claiming there being no proper "true or false."
The fact of the matter is, although probably not the intent of this Wikipedia editor, that The Ra Material is illogical and pseudoscience (scientia = knowledge) as Ra directly claims there is no knowledge to be had in this dimension "without understanding."
The Ra Material is philosophically opposed to any sense of facts especially when it claims that our confusion has a right to remain and be respected.
The Ra Material is a heavy set of logical nihilism preaching the ways of unseen worlds. There is no knowledge to be had here. The most scientific word you can ascribe to this book is science-fiction, although without the proper respect of the field, at most you have just fantasy with a dash of scientific-sounding lore. Neutrally speaking, this is the nature of pseudo-science, no shame intended nor necessary.
Simply, THEY CLAIM EVERYTHING IS THOUGHT: THE Ra MATERIAL CLAIMS THIS IS A DREAM LAND, EVEN THE BOOK IMPLICITLY BEING FANTASY OF "THE CREATOR."
/2 cents
I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed the nihilistic side of the Ra Material.
But Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, I don't understand. If there exists a Wikipedia of the Law of Attraction, you can manage a page of the Law of One logically, thoughtfully, rationally, without entering into psuedo-nonsense. Everything is easily with sufficient length, explainable in terms of the mechanics associated with the Law of One material.
I mean, the Law of One Ra Material posited information years ahead of the then present scientific understanding, it effectively already 'foretold' proven information. A.
B, whats wrong with the label psuedoscience? That's what they call Nikolai Tesla's science, if anything, it's a special way of saying 'thing's that work but we have no fluking idea how!' or 'MAGIC'.
Essentially, to us, magic, to them, science, to wikipedia fiends, nonsense.
I find my perception of your view of the nihilism perspective available from the Ra Material interesting. I still view everything as sacred, as well as equally pointless.
RE: Here we go again (wikipedia) - Adonai One - 10-17-2015
If you want to help the Wikipedia article, all that is necessary is to write an intelligible, common language article on The Law of One and get it published in a MAINSTREAM newspaper/website such as Forbes, The Huffingtonpost, Business Insider, New York Times, etc.
If it is seen as unbiased information, you can use all of it in the Wikipedia page and cite it as a source.
RE: Here we go again (wikipedia) - AnthroHeart - 10-17-2015
(10-16-2015, 10:45 AM)Adonai One Wrote: I believe it is relevant to say that the material at hand claims there is no "right or wrong," which can be thusly and intuitively interpreted as it claiming there being no proper "true or false."
The fact of the matter is, although probably not the intent of this Wikipedia editor, that The Ra Material is illogical and pseudoscience (scientia = knowledge) as Ra directly claims there is no knowledge to be had in this dimension "without understanding."
The Ra Material is philosophically opposed to any sense of facts especially when it claims that our confusion has a right to remain and be respected.
The Ra Material is a heavy set of logical nihilism preaching the ways of unseen worlds. There is no knowledge to be had here. The most scientific word you can ascribe to this book is science-fiction, although without the proper respect of the field, at most you have just fantasy with a dash of scientific-sounding lore. Neutrally speaking, this is the nature of pseudo-science, no shame intended nor necessary.
Simply, THEY CLAIM EVERYTHING IS THOUGHT: THE Ra MATERIAL CLAIMS THIS IS A DREAM LAND, EVEN THE BOOK IMPLICITLY BEING FANTASY OF "THE CREATOR."
/2 cents
I think the Ra material is very real. My dreams sometimes are surreal of other worlds.
RE: Here we go again (wikipedia) - Adonai One - 10-17-2015
Dreams are potentially real; In infinite time, they will inevitably occur as reality.
RE: Here we go again (wikipedia) - Patrick - 09-27-2020
So we're in 2020 now and the Ra Material is still not visible on Wikipedia...
RE: Here we go again (wikipedia) - LeiwoUnion - 12-29-2020
(09-27-2020, 07:58 PM)Patrick Wrote:
So we're in 2020 now and the Ra Material is still not visible on Wikipedia...
To me it seems all is as it should be. There is a deeper meaning of LOO eluding wikipedia's set of rules; I would not hold on to this issue too hard.
RE: Here we go again (wikipedia) - yossarian - 05-09-2021
I just ran into someone randomly, a non-LOO person who hasn't read the books, who told me they read the LOO Wikipedia page and found it interesting
I was like... "I thought that page got deleted... that's weird, I guess it's back up?"
He said.. "Well it must be, I just read it, I only wanted a summary, I haven't read the books"
I said, "That's weird, back about 10 years ago I contributed to that page. I guess it must be back, cool!"
He said, "That's so cool that you wrote on wikipedia!"
So I went and checked. It's still gone lol
So I'm not sure what he was reading but whatever it was it seemed to him like wikipedia, strange world we live in huh
RE: Here we go again (wikipedia) - Patrick - 05-10-2021
I guess that when the LOO is allowed in there, it will be a sign that STS is loosing their grasp.
RE: Here we go again (wikipedia) - Ymarsakar - 05-10-2021
Obfuscation is by intent.