Quote:July 27, 1994 F****, Candy, Laura

After a brief encounter with an easily identifiable "dead dude," whom
we sent away, we used our Reiki symbols, asked specifically for our
communicants from Cassiopaea and the following came through:
Q: We want to communicate with the Cassiopaeans.
A: I am Ra keeper of light.
Q: What are you here to tell us?
A: UFO not all bad.
Q: Why is the connection so bad tonight?
A: You see you are tired.
Q: [Unknown question.]
A: Level through 6.
Q: [Unknown question.]
A: Planet.
Q: [Unknown question.]
A: Always. Please let me go.

It was clear that the energy was very weak on this last contact. It was
also curious that the character "Ra" came through and identified
himself as a "keeper of light."

(02-24-2021, 10:41 PM)Asolsutsesvyl Wrote: In the modern Cassiopaean channeling (after that of the older years which e.g. Montalk finds of much better quality), they've experimented to varying extents here and there with who plays how large a role at the board which is used. It's a bit more flexible than LKJ always having her hand in the process of letters and other symbols being selected.

[...]

(03-27-2020, 01:06 PM)Asolsutsesvyl Wrote:

(03-27-2020, 09:44 AM)888 Wrote:

(02-12-2020, 06:00 AM)Thoth73 Wrote: The Cassiopaean stuff gives me weird and creepy vibes.

By the way, I noticed that there is a mention of Cassiopeia from Ra, which was for the constellation. Does anyone know if the so-called Cassiopaean entities are related to this??

Quote:11.12 # Questioner: Where are these three entities now?

Ra: I am Ra. These entities are in the dimension known to you as fourth. Therefore the space/time continua are not compatible. An approximation of the space/time locus of each would net no actual understanding. Each chose a fourth-density planet which was dedicated to the pursuit of the understanding of the Law of One through service to self, one in what you know as the Orion group, one in what you know as Cassiopeia, one in what you know as Southern Cross; however, these loci are not satisfactory. We do not have vocabulary for the geometric calculations necessary for transfer of this understanding to you.

Yes.

The Cassiopean channelings are an example of negative entities rather successfully (as of now) pretending to be positive entities and de-tuning positive channelers through doomsday prophecies, messages of fear, and opposition.

I agree that it matches. "Cassiopaea" is officially pronounced the same as "Cassiopeia", and the Ra material was spoken, so either spelling can match Ra's words.

There was an exchange in the Cassiopaean material about the reference in the Ra material, but the discussion doesn't add any clarity about Ra's mention. From the 1996-08-11 session:

Quote:Q: (L) OK, I've got a question on that. C*** called today, and in her
conversation about the Ra material, she asked me, was I aware that
in the Ra material, they designated Cassiopaea as the residence of
some real negative, icky, Orion-type STS aliens. Can you make a
comment on these?
A:?
Q: (L) Also, the picture of the mantid-type beings in that document
that I lent to Shawn has these beings designated as Cassiopaeans.
Who are these Cassiopaeans? (T) Before they answer, can I make
a comment here? There is no star called Cassiopaea on our star
charts. (L) Oh, I know... (T) It's a constellation. So for her to read this
in the Ra material and go along with that there's a bunch of people
called the Cassiopaeans who are horrible people on a planet
someplace called Cassiopaea, there is no place called that. So there
can't actually be anyone called Cassiopaeans because there is no
Cassiopaea. (L) OK, can we get commentary on this?
A: Sounds good to us!

That was also the session in which the C's first claimed that the Ra material is "63%" accurate [while the C's material is claimed 71.7% accurate].

There's a long thread on the Cassiopaea forum analogous to this one. I haven't checked it since I was active on the Cassiopaea forum, but the same question was brought up there, without any conclusive answer. Someone tried to turn things around and delve into symbology in an attempt to associate Ra with Orion, but it wasn't found convincing by others.

A portion of the text in the opening post here, about Ra and language, I copied from a post I made in that thread. Somewhat earlier in the thread, a few who are into the Ra material (some are and some aren't in the Cassiopaea community) expressed preferring the language of Ra to that of the C's. Laura then suggested that those who prefer Ra don't really belong. She also perceived Ra's words to smugly and condescendingly speak down to the audience.

As Tobey at lawofone.info reports, the actual words recorded are monotone and most of the time in an even and fairly slow pace. In other words, there's no human emotion or attitude expressed at all. This "blankness" in Ra's words make them an excellent receiving surface for psychological projection, I think, and this seems to explain Laura's response to them.

My current thinking is that this Ra Q-and-A may explain the Cassiopaean contact:

Quote:67.20 # Questioner: Now, the main point of this line of questioning has to do with the first distortion and the fact that this window existed. Was this, shall I say, a portion of the random window effect and are we experiencing the same type of balancing in receiving the offerings of this entity as the planet in general receives because of the window effect?

Ra: I am Ra. This is precisely correct. As the planetary sphere accepts more highly evolved positive entities or groups with information to offer, the same opportunity must be offered to similarly wise negatively oriented entities or groups.

(02-25-2021, 09:58 AM)Agua Wrote: I would say the whole „ veil“ thing is to a large extent an interpretation.
Interpretation in so far as we make a,belief system out of it, saying, „oh, there is the veil and that’s why our experience is so seperated“.

At least that part that keeps the seperation up, the seperation from our divine Self and from other beings is completely self-created during this incarnation.
It is not something that is set in stone.

(02-25-2021, 12:12 PM)MrWho Wrote: The veil is more like an artifact. No longer the "structure" of our reality.

It lingers, but only barely.

Those who are spiritually inclined notice the effect it(the ones spiritual aptitude) has on our other-selves. Even if they are completely in orange ray and not very self conscious.(the other-selves)

(02-25-2021, 11:12 AM)Agua Wrote:

(02-25-2021, 10:19 AM)Patrick Wrote: It's an interesting perspective.

With interesting perspective, are you:

- referring to my original comment regarding the movement away from the physical as an „obstacle“ related to trauma (which would be my,actual statement)
- or the late comment regarding the veil (which I would call a rather „transient“ comment)

And, in saying „interesting perspective“, is that such an unusual perspective for you?
I wouldn’t call it especially unique, rather a widespread common view amongst seekers...

(02-25-2021, 12:12 PM)MrWho Wrote: The veil is more like an artifact. No longer the "structure" of our reality.

It lingers, but only barely.

Those who are spiritually inclined notice the effect it(the ones spiritual aptitude) has on our other-selves. Even if they are completely in orange ray and not very self conscious.(the other-selves)

Ra 85.19 Wrote:...Also upon the list of significant veiled functions of the mind would be that of dreaming. The so-called dreaming contains a great deal which, if made available to the conscious mind and used, shall aid it in polarization to a great extent.

The third function of the mind which is significant and which has been veiled is that of the knowing of the body. The knowledge of and control over the body, having been lost to a great extent in the veiling process, is thusly lost from the experience of the seeker. Its knowledge before the veiling is of small use. Its knowledge after the veiling, and in the face of what is now a dense illusion of separation of body complex from mind complex, is quite significant.

Perhaps the most important and significant function that occurred due to the veiling of the mind from itself is not in itself a function of mind but rather is a product of the potential created by this veiling. This is the faculty of will or pure desire...

Quote:Questioner: Yes.

Ra: You must see the Earth, as you call it, as being seven Earths. There is red, orange, yellow, and there will soon be a completed green color vibratory locus for fourth-density entities which they will call Earth. During the fourth-density experience, due to the lack of development of fourth-density entities, the third-density planetary sphere is not useful for habitation since the early fourth-density entity will not know precisely how to maintain the illusion that fourth density cannot be seen or determined from any instrumentation available to any third density.

Thus in fourth density the red, orange, and green energy nexi of your planet will be activated while the yellow is in potentiation along with the blue and the indigo.

May we ask at this time if there be any brief queries?

Quote:Questioner: Thank you very much. I wish to say again… consider it an honor, great honor, and also a privilege, as my [inaudible]. And I would like to reiterate [that my] questions may sometimes go a little off because I keep going on something that I had already started to work into the applications of the Law of One to better understand primarily the free-will principle and further distortions that we discover.

I got three questions just now in meditation. I’ll ask them first before we continue. First, we are now in the fourth density. Will the effects of the fourth density increase in the next thirty years? Will we see more changes in our environment and our effect upon our environment?

Ra: I am Ra. The fourth density is a vibrational spectrum. Your time/space continuum has spiraled your planetary sphere and your, what we would call galaxy, what you call star, into this vibration. This will cause the planetary sphere itself to electromagnetically realign its vortices of reception of the instreaming of cosmic forces expressing themselves as vibrational webs so that the Earth will thus be fourth-density magnetized, as you might call it.

This is going to occur with some inconvenience, as we have said before, due to the energies of the thought-forms of your peoples which disturb the orderly constructs of energy patterns within your Earth spirals of energy which increases entropy and unusable heat. This will cause your planetary sphere to have some ruptures in its outer garment while making itself appropriately magnetized for fourth density. This is the planetary adjustment.

You will find a sharp increase in the number of people, as you call mind/body/spirit complexes, whose vibrational potentials include the potential for fourth-vibrational distortions. Thus, there will seem to be, shall we say, a new breed. These are those incarnating for fourth-density work.

There will also be a sharp increase in the short run of negatively oriented or polarized mind/body/spirit complexes and social complexes, due to the polarizing conditions of the sharp delineation between fourth-density characteristics and third-density self-service orientation.

Those who remain in fourth density upon this plane will be of the so-called positive orientation. Many will come from elsewhere, for it would appear that with all of the best efforts of the Confederation, which includes those from your peoples’ inner planes, inner civilizations, and those from other dimensions, the harvest will still be much less than that which this planetary sphere is capable of comfortably supporting in service.

Quote:Questioner: What is the position of this planet with respect to progression of the cycle at this time?

Ra: I am Ra. This sphere is at this time in fourth-dimension vibration. Its material is quite confused due to the society memory complexes embedded in its consciousness. It has not made an easy transition to the vibrations which beckon. Therefore, it will be fetched with some inconvenience.

(02-25-2021, 07:48 AM)Agua Wrote: Yes, I understand where you don't get my point.

To start with, spirituality is a personal thing.
Each person decides for themself which way to go, so that is not meant as a judgement

Having said that, the idea spiritual development would be a movement away from the physical is what I would call a misconception.

[...]

So my recommendation would be to NOT move away from the physical, but to move fully iNTO the physical.

(02-25-2021, 07:48 AM)Agua Wrote: The "danger" in that would be not realizing that in fact you are exactly as deeply entrenched in the non-spiritual as before.

While before you were "lost" in thinking about mundane concerns, now you would be lost in thinking about spiritual concerns.
You are still lost in "thinking".

(02-25-2021, 07:48 AM)Agua Wrote: We started this incarnation in a state of consciousness that you could call enlightened.
Then we had traumatic experiences, which (in Ra terms) created blockages, or (in other terms) made you seperate from yourself and the physical.

At that point a "dissociation" did occur, a seperation from your deeper Self as well as from the physical.

You could view that as a "semi-dieing".

(02-25-2021, 07:48 AM)Agua Wrote: So actually we inhabit an abstract thought realm, which is neither physical nor spiritual.

Quote:Questioner: Is this energy center, then, on a very small scale related to the orange energy center in man?

Ra: I am Ra. The true color is precisely the same. However, the consciousness of the second-density beginning is primitive and the use of orange ray limited to the expression of self which may be seen to be movement and survival.

In third density, at this time, those clinging to orange ray have a much more complex system of distortions through which orange ray is manifested. This is somewhat complicated. We shall endeavor to simplify.

The appropriate true color for third density is, as you have ascertained, yellow. However, the influences of the true color, green, acting upon yellow-ray entities have caused many entities to revert to the consideration of self rather than the stepping forward into consideration of other-self or green ray. This may not be seen to be of a negatively polarized nature, as the negatively polarized entity is working very intensively with the deepest manifestations of yellow-ray group energies, especially the manipulations of other-self for service to self. Those reverting to orange ray, and we may add these are many upon your plane at this time, are those who feel the vibrations of true color green and, therefore, respond by rejecting governmental and societal activities as such and seek once more the self.

However, not having developed the yellow ray properly so that it balances the personal vibratory rates of the entity, the entity then is faced with the task of further activation and balancing of the self in relation to the self, thus the orange-ray manifestations at this space/time nexus.

Thus true color orange is that which it is, without difference. However, the manifestations of this or any ray may be seen to be most various depending upon the vibratory levels and balances of the mind/body or mind/body/spirit complexes which are expressing these energies.

(02-25-2021, 12:51 PM)MrWho Wrote: We are already 4th density. I do not believe there will be a sudden momentous change. For something that has already happened. The logic falls apart.

Quote:63.25 Questioner: Then at some time in the future the fourth-density sphere will be fully activated. What is the difference between full activation and partial activation for this sphere?

Ra: I am Ra. At this time the cosmic influxes are conducive to true-color green core particles being formed and material of this nature thus being formed. However, there is a mixture of the yellow-ray and green-ray environments at this time necessitating the birthing of transitional mind/body/spirit complex types of energy distortions. At full activation of the true-color green density of love the planetary sphere will be solid and inhabitable upon its own and the birthing that takes place will have been transformed through the process of time, shall we say, to the appropriate type of vehicle to appreciate in full the fourth-density planetary environment. At this nexus the green-ray environment exists to a far greater extent in time/space than in space/time.

Quote:Questioner: What, assuming that we are, our vibration— I am assuming this vibration started increasing about between twenty and thirty years ago. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. The first harbingers of this were approximately forty-five of your years ago, the energies vibrating more intensely through the forty-year period preceding the final movement of vibratory matter, shall we say, through the quantum leap, as you would call it.

Quote:Questioner: From last session, I would like to continue with a few questions about the fact that in fourth density red, orange, and green energies will be activated; yellow, blue, etc., being in potentiation. Right now, you say we have green energies activated. They have been activated for the last 45 years. I am wondering about the transition through this period so that the green is totally activated and the yellow is in potentiation. What will we lose as the yellow goes from activation into potentiation, and what will we gain as the green comes into total activation, and what is that process?

Ra: I am Ra. It is misleading to speak of gains and losses when dealing with the subject of the cycle’s ending and the green-ray cycle beginning upon your sphere. It is to be kept in the forefront of the faculties of intelligence that there is one creation in which there is no loss. There are progressive cycles for experiential use by entities. We may now address your query.

As the green-ray cycle or the density of love and understanding begins to take shape the yellow-ray plane or Earth which you now enjoy in your dance will cease to be inhabited for some period of your space/time as the space/time necessary for fourth-density entities to learn their ability to shield their density from that of third is learned. After this period there will come a time when third density may again cycle on the yellow-ray sphere.

Meanwhile there is another sphere, congruent to a great extent with yellow ray, forming. This fourth-density sphere coexists with first, second, and third. It is of a denser nature due to the rotational core atomic aspects of its material. We have discussed this subject with you.

The fourth-density entities which incarnate at this space/time are fourth density in the view of experience but are incarnating in less dense vehicles due to desire to experience and aid in the birth of fourth density upon this plane.

You may note that fourth-density entities have a great abundance of compassion.

Quote:Questioner: Then what will be the time of transition on this planet from third to fourth density?

Ra: I am Ra. This is difficult to estimate due to the uncharacteristic anomalies of this transition. There are at this space/time nexus beings incarnate which have begun fourth-density work. However, the third-density climate of planetary consciousness is retarding the process. At this particular nexus the possibility/probability vortices indicate somewhere between 100 and 700 of your years as transition period. This cannot be accurate due to the volatility of your peoples at this space/time.

(02-25-2021, 01:43 PM)MrWho Wrote: ...All efforts should be made to find harmony to reduce this transition period.

https://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/issues/2007/2007_0731.aspx Q`uo Wrote:...That which you know of the higher planes, that which you remember in a dim or not so dim way, bring into your heart and let it bless the environment that you see before you, just as it is. You are not here to clean it up. You are not here to make it right. You are not here to fix it. For all of the outer world is an illusion. You are here to love it. Take the world in your arms and embrace it. This is how you came to serve. This is your glory and your crown. Wear it well and rejoice in being here...

(02-25-2021, 12:34 PM)Minyatur Wrote: We are still within a 3D experience, just that we are also experiencing a mixture of 4D energies at this time.

(02-26-2021, 12:02 PM)Asolsutsesvyl Wrote: In the Cassiopaean version, STO and STS exist as universal abstractions, as cosmic "thought centers", considered very real, and which beings are aligned with in differing proportions. STO pulls towards full consciousness and non-materiality, while STS pulls towards consciousness ultimately collapsing and "falling asleep" as matter. LKJ moralizes it in terms of "ignorance is bliss" being the core of materialism and in some way all STS mentality. The idea of STS-ness at the core of what turns consciousness into sleeping matter is very gnostic.

By contrast, Ra's version describes the cosmos as something much more organically evolving, in which good and evil are not handed down from the top-down. Instead, STO and STS emerged from the bottom-up as a result of logoses experimenting with tweaking the parameters of sub-creations. The fundamental division -- or creation of the illusion of non-unity -- is not the same division as the STS-STO division, unlike in LKJ's cosmology.

(02-26-2021, 12:02 PM)Asolsutsesvyl Wrote: By contrast, Ra's version describes the cosmos as something much more organically evolving, in which good and evil are not handed down from the top-down. Instead, STO and STS emerged from the bottom-up as a result of logoses experimenting with tweaking the parameters of sub-creations. The fundamental division -- or creation of the illusion of non-unity -- is not the same division as the STS-STO division, unlike in LKJ's cosmology.

(02-26-2021, 01:26 PM)zedro Wrote:

(02-26-2021, 12:02 PM)Asolsutsesvyl Wrote: In the Cassiopaean version, STO and STS exist as universal abstractions, as cosmic "thought centers", considered very real, and which beings are aligned with in differing proportions. STO pulls towards full consciousness and non-materiality, while STS pulls towards consciousness ultimately collapsing and "falling asleep" as matter. LKJ moralizes it in terms of "ignorance is bliss" being the core of materialism and in some way all STS mentality. The idea of STS-ness at the core of what turns consciousness into sleeping matter is very gnostic.

By contrast, Ra's version describes the cosmos as something much more organically evolving, in which good and evil are not handed down from the top-down. Instead, STO and STS emerged from the bottom-up as a result of logoses experimenting with tweaking the parameters of sub-creations. The fundamental division -- or creation of the illusion of non-unity -- is not the same division as the STS-STO division, unlike in LKJ's cosmology.

I feel like this is a matter of relative (contextual) perspective, where the two views aren't necessarily exclusive of each other. The former view feels like it lends itself to a more practical perspective, the latter more philosophical. But like anything, both may have their pitfalls if misapplied.

I have no problem with the labels good/evil, because I can apply it in a contextual manner (there is a basic 3d morality, not necessarily a popular viewpoint here but I'm not going to debate it ). But I can also understand the 'usefulness' of said polarities from a higher viewpoint at the same time. So while I don't want to get overly invested in morality plays, I also don't want to become so detached that I become a 'benign sociopath', because that wouldn't be useful to my function.

(02-26-2021, 04:27 PM)Asolsutsesvyl Wrote: And since STO turns towards Unity, it strives for Being, whereas STS as path of Separation has an illusory goal, a goal thus centered in Non-being.

(02-26-2021, 06:46 PM)zedro Wrote:

(02-26-2021, 04:27 PM)Asolsutsesvyl Wrote: And since STO turns towards Unity, it strives for Being, whereas STS as path of Separation has an illusory goal, a goal thus centered in Non-being.

I do rather like that dichotomy, but do you feel that is more from the STO persons context (or additionally the STS submissive)? It feels that the 'illusory goal' of perpetuating 'non-being' is the goal of the dominant STS entity to perpetuate on others for the benefit of controlling them, but not necessarily held as their own view on existence, which is to be THE creator of their own domain. Or am I overreaching the concept?

(02-26-2021, 09:14 PM)Dtris Wrote: The Non-Being and Being dichotomy falls apart if you believe in a creation in which all are "redeemed" at 6th density and all is ultimately the explorations of the creator.

In the Ra cosmology all that exists is conscious in some way. From the simplest of sub atomic particles, to bacteria and viruses, to plants, animals, humans, and higher density life forms. Even the planets and stars are conscious outside of the evolutionary track. The upward spiraling light pulls upward all beings given enough time. All is ultimately consciousness growing in unique directions.

STS is not a path of non-being. It is a path where one must use control and dominance to overcome entropy. All becomes part of the self under the control of the self. Either path leads to the creator, since all are ultimately the creator experiencing itself.

(02-26-2021, 10:21 PM)zedro Wrote:

(02-26-2021, 09:14 PM)Dtris Wrote: The Non-Being and Being dichotomy falls apart if you believe in a creation in which all are "redeemed" at 6th density and all is ultimately the explorations of the creator.

In the Ra cosmology all that exists is conscious in some way. From the simplest of sub atomic particles, to bacteria and viruses, to plants, animals, humans, and higher density life forms. Even the planets and stars are conscious outside of the evolutionary track. The upward spiraling light pulls upward all beings given enough time. All is ultimately consciousness growing in unique directions.

STS is not a path of non-being. It is a path where one must use control and dominance to overcome entropy. All becomes part of the self under the control of the self. Either path leads to the creator, since all are ultimately the creator experiencing itself.

No doubt, I'm taking it as a contextual viewpoint, like an internalized philosophy or system of thought one might adopt for a purpose. That was the framework for the post.

I tend to subscribe to the notion that there are 'metaphorical truths' which have (limited) practical applications depending on where you are in the physical/metaphysical hierarchy. For instance acting as a sovereign individual is more practical to 3d spiritual development than considering yourself as basically a god, because ironically those who consider themselves as the latter tend to be narcissists, while being the individual might instill a better sense of responsibility. Of course this is a generalized example and I know could ruffle feathers in spiritual circles, but the main point is holding certain perspectives as truth may be more useful in some contexts, even if it's not the over-arching truth. This is why I believe we see different philosophies emerge from various higher dimensional sources, because there is obviously no consensus on how you appropriatly teach spiritual principals to veiled 3d beings with free will programming. The experiment lies both in the learning and teaching.

Note I'm not debating on whether the C's or the Ra's have the greater metaphysical accuracy, but I'm more curious about the potentially different teaching values and outcomes (which I believe is Asolsutsesvyl's point). It reminds me of my engineering courses, where what was taught in year one almost gets scrapped in year 4, because it was so oversimplified that it barely represented reality, but it was a useful scalfolding at the time to start building the deeper reality around.

(02-28-2021, 09:05 PM)Dtris Wrote: I am a big fan of using your beliefs to create the most useful structures in your perception to enhance your life. If we look at the dichotomy of being and non-being from a usefulness perspective, where does it enhance a person's life?

In your initial thinking the usefulness comes from not believing it themselves but enforcing the belief on their minions. Which does not actually speak to the efficacy of the belief but efficacy of a method of coercion.

(02-26-2021, 06:46 PM)zedro Wrote:

(02-26-2021, 04:27 PM)Asolsutsesvyl Wrote: And since STO turns towards Unity, it strives for Being, whereas STS as path of Separation has an illusory goal, a goal thus centered in Non-being.

I do rather like that dichotomy, but do you feel that is more from the STO persons context (or additionally the STS submissive)? It feels that the 'illusory goal' of perpetuating 'non-being' is the goal of the dominant STS entity to perpetuate on others for the benefit of controlling them, but not necessarily held as their own view on existence, which is to be THE creator of their own domain. Or am I overreaching the concept?

(02-26-2021, 09:14 PM)Dtris Wrote: The Non-Being and Being dichotomy falls apart if you believe in a creation in which all are "redeemed" at 6th density and all is ultimately the explorations of the creator.

(02-28-2021, 09:05 PM)Dtris Wrote: From the perspective of 3D I can think of a good reason to believe and perpetuate this belief among a group. By believing that STS leads to non-being, you are defining those who are STS as LESS than those who are STO. Of course the in group is always going to be STO while those who are outside, whether 3D or not, will be defined as STS. Thus devalued in the minds of the in group, creating a sense of superiority and elitism. This being the hallmark of STS polarization.

Maybe those who are more familiar with that forum can say if that is an accurate situation in that community.

Quote:October 23, 2004

Laura, Ark, Perceval, Mr. Scott, Galahad, Atriedes, Andromeda, Alice {Laura's Mother}, JM-guest

A: Look love Hello, my children!
Q: (L) Who is with us?
A: Ioorinaea
Q: (L) Where are you transmitting from, or through?
A: Rigel
Q: (L) What happened to Cassiopaea?
A: Mother Cassiopaea has retired!
Q: (L) What does that mean?
A: Far noon!
Q: (L) Were you ever in a human body?
A: Farnoon!
Q: (L) What does that maen?
A: Hello in Orion
Q: (L) What if we want to speak with the Cassiopaeans?
A: I will pass on the message.
Q: (L) Why did Cassiopaea retire?
A: 5 months ago there was a galatic explosion that disrupted the transmitter.
Q: (L) Are you an alien?
A: Other
Q: (L) What do you mean?
A: Density 6 piquawmns/for p5t oriaea.
Q: (L) That doesn't make any sense!
A: Not so! Must regroove.
[...]
Q: (Ark) Why we were given no warning about the galactic explosion?
A: Quantum probabilities and you were not picking up the phone.
[...]
Q: (L) What is your relationship with Cassiopaea?
A: Relationship does not apply when one.
Q: (L) Then is it the same source using a different transmitter?
A: Precisely. And it would be easier if you received more regularly.
Q: (A) Where was the galactic explosion?
A: In Cassiopeia.
Q: (A) How far was it from us?
A: Probably 2600 light years.
Q: (Galahad) Have there been any effects that we have felt here? (A) Yes, we lost the Cassiopaeans!
A: Too minimal too notice.
[...]
Q: (Galahad) What is the major problem facing the group at the moment?
A: Stalling frequency waves.
Q: What can we do to jump-start the group?
A: Requires will and knowledge. You share, they find will if it is there to find.
Q: (A) What kind of knowledge do we need to share?
A: That their lack of ability to see and do is due to deliberate stalling.
Q: (Galahad) Can you elaborate?
A: They are in a frequency fence being stored for later food.
Q: (A) Are we also in a fence? Or, are we different?
A: Quite.
Q: We are quite different?
A: Yes.
Q: What makes us different?
A: Seeing and doing.

(05-01-2021, 08:17 AM)Patrick Wrote: It's hard for me to believe that anyone would resonate with that stuff.