+- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Bring4th Community (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=16)
+--- Forum: Olio (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 (/showthread.php?tid=9428)
RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for - Horuseus - 07-04-2014
(07-04-2014, 05:51 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: Good words. I have been placing utmost importance on how I polarize. Been worried about it. Been trying to be STO, and it sometimes makes it hard to live when I feel I must serve one who does not appreciate being served.
I can understand that. Honestly it is pretty much a meaningless goal to strive as often the STO/STS moniker with talk of the harvest tends to be utilised as a switched up version of the Heaven/Hell scenario and the scale of your Good/Bad deeds after one passes away. I'm not saying there aren't various opposing sides of the spectrum in the grand play, just that by trying to serve is the same as trying to love, which you can't really do. It's something that can only come naturally, and you can only truly serve if you're being your own unique self. It's really the HS's job to deal with the harvest stuff, we just do our role by enjoying the ride and working with the catalyst provided.
If you think of the Infinite Creator as a massive puzzle and we the jigsaw pieces. If the Jigsaw pieces aren't being their unique selves and formation they will not fit in coherently in the functioning of the grand puzzle, and so are not truly being of 'service', as it were. However, if you are simply being who you are, you are being your unique puzzle piece and do 'fit' in a harmonious manner. It pretty much comes down to surrendering and trusting the energies in your life, or as some may say 'be in the flow'.
infinity - anagogy - 07-04-2014
(07-04-2014, 01:53 AM)Adonai One Wrote: Does not every person contain the creator according to Ra? Are we not all things?
Is not every person a container of the creator and all?
Consciousness is the container for all existence. A self is a focus of consciousness. A self is a perspective, with certain boundaries of existence, or definition. Beingness goes beyond perspective as we understand it. It is the container for perspectives.
Now, it is true we are really consciousness, but to call that a self feels improper to me, as there is no identification in that unified essence. A self identifies with specific attributes and projects inwards those attributes felt to be of itself and projects outwards those attributes felt not to be of self, because it is distorted light. The Beingness of the 8th density does not as I understand it (7th density is close to this as well).
When you try to make that Beingness into a "self", you attempt to build ownership, ego, identification, and projection into the infinite. I'm just trying to tell you that there is no sense of ownership in that essence, or a conscious sense of self referential awareness. Just awareness of infinite potential.
RE: - BrownEye - 07-04-2014
(07-04-2014, 09:53 PM)anagogy Wrote: A self is a focus of consciousness.
This says it all.
As such, we might understand that the portion of consciousness that we call the personality will be formed by what we focus on. That means that it is most useful to make wise choices about what we choose to put our focus into.
Also may find that maturity is linked to this ability to make conscious decisions.
RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - Adonai One - 07-05-2014
Quote:4.20 Questioner: My objective is primarily to discover more of the Law of One, and [it would] be very helpful to discover techniques of healing. I am aware of your problem with respect to free will. Can you make… You cannot make suggestions, so I will ask you if you can state the Law of One and the laws of healing to me?
Ra: I am Ra. The Law of One, though beyond the limitations of name, as you call vibratory sound complexes, may be approximated by stating that all things are one, that there is no polarity, no right or wrong, no disharmony, but only identity. All is one, and that one is love/light, light/love, the Infinite Creator...
?
identity - anagogy - 07-05-2014
(07-05-2014, 12:13 AM)Adonai One Wrote:Quote:4.20 Questioner: My objective is primarily to discover more of the Law of One, and [it would] be very helpful to discover techniques of healing. I am aware of your problem with respect to free will. Can you make… You cannot make suggestions, so I will ask you if you can state the Law of One and the laws of healing to me?
Ra: I am Ra. The Law of One, though beyond the limitations of name, as you call vibratory sound complexes, may be approximated by stating that all things are one, that there is no polarity, no right or wrong, no disharmony, but only identity. All is one, and that one is love/light, light/love, the Infinite Creator...
?
"Ra: At the seventh level or dimension, we shall, if our humble efforts are sufficient, become one with all, thus having no memory, no identity, no past or future, but existing in the all"
???????
![[Image: depositphotos_5209467-Young-woman-presen...roduct.jpg]](http://static5.depositphotos.com/1029233/520/i/950/depositphotos_5209467-Young-woman-presenting-a-product.jpg)
RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - Adonai One - 07-05-2014
Will not the 7th and 8th level inevitably return to identity when a new creation is formed?
identity - anagogy - 07-05-2014
(07-05-2014, 01:32 AM)Adonai One Wrote: Will not the 7th and 8th level inevitably return to identity when a new creation is formed?
Depends how you look at it. From the 8th level, there are no levels. All the things we perceive as reality (i.e. forms, structures, appearances) only exist from the outside looking inwards. From the place of infinity, none of that stuff exists in separation, so it doesn't stand out as an apparent reality.
In other words, our illusory appearance of separation has absolutely zero impact on the absolute infinity that is the 8th level. We are like solid ice crystals of varying sizes forming in a vast supply of water, but at the upper levels everything is still liquid. The form we take: solid, liquid, gas, has no bearing on the fact that everything is still h2o.
RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - vervex - 07-06-2014
After letting it sit for a while and in response to your original post, here is my perspective and understanding at this time:
Polarity, as I understand it, is a mode of work which arises when one experiences self-awareness and awareness of "the other". Prior to perceiving the self and the other as separate entities, there is no polarity; there is no choice. As you know already, polarity begets a choice between accepting or rejecting elements of consciousness (parts of existence itself, the self, the environment, emotions, beliefs, change or united perspective).
Would we not experience rejection in some capacity, we would be unable to experience our current perspective, an individual perspective. Similarly, if we did not experience some degree of acceptance, all there would be for us to experience is unconsciousness. The question of polarity is how much we accept. Acceptance of all (which could also be described as love of all) is the default state. Every veil is partial unconsciousness, a rejection. We veil ourselves, if only to create the dynamic experience we have now.
Polarity in my eyes isn't so much about happiness but, more objectively, about the mode of navigation of life we choose, globally and moment to moment.
We are inherently one and united, and so it is my understanding that we are naturally attracted towards the uncovering of all fragments of ourselves, intuitively guided towards acceptance of all that we are. It is only through resistance we encounter separation and through will that we maintain or increase this perceived disconnection. Resisting one's original state may cause pain whereas gliding through what comes "naturally", in a state of non-resistance and satisfaction, may cause pleasure or, as you term it, happiness.
Therefore, while it would make sense to pursue the positive polarity in order to harness more pleasure or happiness in life, I would argue polarity isn't necessarily "about happiness", but rather that happiness is a likely emotional response as a result of this choice, either made consistently or sporadically. Claiming positive polarity is about happiness is looking at it from the angle of subjective significance rather than objectively. It is not false; simply a bit skewed in my opinion.
Personally, if I had to slap a word over positive polarity, it would be "peace". But what "it's about" isn't a quality; it is simply a method of operation.
Additionally, in a complete mode of acceptance, there is little to no need for will. One who chooses this path of least-resistance will find himself soaring through the waters carried by its currents, his desires and dreams serving as compass.
RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - Adonai One - 07-06-2014
eeeehhhh ermmmm herm ahhhh yeah hmmm let me stew
Would you describe the positive polarity as about only love?
RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - vervex - 07-06-2014
(07-06-2014, 12:02 AM)Adonai One Wrote: eeeehhhh ermmmm herm ahhhh yeah hmmm let me stew
Would you describe the positive polarity as about only love?
My understanding is the following: Positive polarity isn't "about" anything other than the mode in which it operates, which is a mode of acceptance. In my eyes, polarity is a choice, and so you could say that yes, the positive polarity is "about choosing love" or "choosing acceptance". Assigning it a meaning, a goal, an emotion or any other flavour is a valid yet subjective distortion.
RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - Adonai One - 07-06-2014
You win $50, Tina, for making me change my vocabulary completely on this issue.
Happiness isn't the best word.
RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - vervex - 07-06-2014
(07-06-2014, 12:11 AM)Adonai One Wrote: You win $50, Tina, for making me change my vocabulary completely on this issue.
Happiness isn't the best word.
$50? What happened to the $100 bet?
RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - Adonai One - 07-06-2014
$100 then... Take it from my wallet.
Thanks to the others who have helped me understand that it's really about love... Although happiness is a property.
RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - Lorna - 07-06-2014
we are all creators
balance and polarity helps us to create in a way that is better aligned with what our 'self' wants to create
gaze within the mirror, see the creator
we are all of us in a state of becoming that which we seek
RE: Convince me that positive polarization and balancing isn't about happiness for $100 - AnthroHeart - 07-06-2014
I think that one does what makes them happy. Whether this is balancing and polarizing, it matters not. There are many ways to be happy.