(03-26-2011, 01:49 AM)Ankh Wrote: I think that there are no galactic or universal or solar system judges who will decide whether you are 50% STO or 51, or more. Do you think that every thought, every emotion, every action of yours counts by any entities who judge whether it was STO or STS? I think that we are our own judges. And we, ourselves, decide what was STO or STS and how much of it, when we are ready for that process, reviewing our life. That we ourselves decide whether we made it or if we need more 3D lessons.

(03-12-2011, 07:18 PM)Namaste Wrote: This forum is for those who resonate deeply with the Law of One, the home density is negligible :¬)

transiten wants to quote 3DMonkey Wrote:Then copy and paste what you want

(03-12-2011, 03:13 PM)turtledude23 Wrote: Firstly: the majority of wanderers will not fully awake, which makes it likely that many of them won't reach 50% STO and graduate and will therefore repeat the 3D cycle; wanderers don't get an easy ticket out. I hope that makes you feel better.

(04-07-2011, 02:19 PM)Ocean Wrote: lol this is like teaching granma the VCR over the internet.

(04-08-2011, 01:08 PM)transiten Wrote: Thanks a LOT Derek

Ocean, Grandma will study this in a while!

...and 3DM
I actually suspect i could be your grandma even if i don't look or act like one all the time <Lol>

transiten-guess my age

(04-08-2011, 06:48 PM)Ocean Wrote: and if you realize you did wrong, and polarize then why is there still karma?

Quote:18.12 Questioner: You stated yesterday that forgiveness is the eradicator of karma. I am assuming that balanced forgiveness for the full eradication of karma would require forgiveness not only of other-selves but also the forgiveness of self. Am I correct?

Ra: I am Ra. You are correct. We will briefly expand upon this understanding in order to clarify.

Forgiveness of other-self is forgiveness of self. An understanding of this insists upon full forgiveness upon the conscious level of self and other-self, for they are one. A full forgiveness is thus impossible without the inclusion of self.

34.4 Questioner: Thank you. Would you define karma?

Ra: I am Ra. Our understanding of karma is that which may be called inertia. Those actions which are put into motion will continue using the ways of balancing until such time as the controlling or higher principle which you may liken unto your braking or stopping is invoked. This stoppage of the inertia of action may be called forgiveness. These two concepts are inseparable.

34.5 Questioner: If an entity develops what is called karma in an incarnation, is there then programming that sometimes occurs so that he will experience catalysts that will enable him to get to a point of forgiveness thereby alleviating the karma?

Ra: I am Ra. This is, in general, correct. However, both self and any involved other-self may, at any time through the process of understanding, acceptance, and forgiveness, ameliorate these patterns. This is true at any point in an incarnative pattern. Thus one who has set in motion an action may forgive itself and never again make that error. This also brakes or stops what you call karma.

(04-08-2011, 10:01 PM)JoshC Wrote: To be honest, no one here really knows (unless through some strange revelation that makes at best a subjective conviction) that they're a wanderer.

Quote:36.24 Questioner: I’ll just ask one short one before we close. Can you tell me what percentage of the Wanderers on Earth today have been successful in penetrating the memory block and have become aware of who they are, and finally, is there anything that we can do to make the instrument more comfortable or to improve the contact?

Ra: I am Ra. We can approximate the percentage of those penetrating intelligently their status. This is between eight and one-half and nine and three-quarters percent. There is a larger percentile group of those who have a fairly well defined, shall we say, symptomology indicating to them that they are not of this, shall we say, “insanity.” This amounts to a bit over fifty percent of the remainder. Nearly one-third of the remainder are aware that something about them is different, so you see there are many gradations of awakening to the knowledge of being a Wanderer. We may add that it is to the middle and first of these groups that this information will, shall we say, make sense.

Quote: 3DMonkey, he meant it as a rhetorical question. He's implying that if you weren't a wanderer you would not be interested in the LOO.