![]() |
The New Priesthood of Ra? - Printable Version +- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums) +-- Forum: Bring4th Studies (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Strictly Law of One Material (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: The New Priesthood of Ra? (/showthread.php?tid=176) |
RE: The New Priesthood of Ra? - Sirius - 06-12-2009 I'm a little confused as to the discussion here about binaray/hex base mathmatics. I have a good understanding of these number systems due to length, boring programming lessons. The one thing I can muster so far is the creation of a universal language made out of numbers. I too have thought this before, as we all know how limiting the spoken word can be. And we're speaking english! Numbers are constant and universal, to my understanding, the transition to 4D will not make 1+1=something totaly different. The idea of a universal language through numbers is sound, although what may you suggest is also universal? This idea has just come back to me, I remember seeing it on Stargate SG1. They found a meeting room for 5 different races, the ancients among them, there was something in the middle that projected ALL OF THE ELEMENTS, the way that malecules link up. Daniel did stay for a long time almost going insane at the incredable science that he had discovered, but the fact that they where "merely" used for communication between the different speaking species was only uncovered at the end. Much like how the chinese write thier words, I feel you would be able to add alot more definition and meaning to the myriad of elements in this universe. To say numbers is the way forwards is clever, but short seen in my point of view. there will be a need for a new definition, to which you would merely count on anothr number and will eventually end up with 3876786234 means computer or something, then the task of having to remember each and every number for it's meaning would be almost impossible. Numbers are self containing, and it is relatively difficult to add mesages to numbers, sybols (elements) on the other hand. I don't know if this fits in with the discussion as I said I'm not brilliantly sure what is being discussed, but I offer this anyway. Love and Light RE: The New Priesthood of Ra? - fairyfarmgirl - 06-12-2009 The message is not the numbers but the tones. This is the true language of the Universe. The language of the Spheres (an old way of saying tones). Tones are inherently mathematical beyond our comprehension (especially a Fairy Girl like me). fairyfarmgirl RE: The New Priesthood of Ra? - Sirius - 06-12-2009 I can't believe vibration slipped my mind whilst writing that post. I guess I was far too absorbed in formulating my concept regarding the elements. thanks for pointing out the unseemingly obvuis at the time ![]() If tones are inherantly mathmatical then we end up with the same predicament as before. When we are discussing communication is telepathy not natively 4D ? so written language at that point becomes obsolete. Thoughts however, also sometimes depicted as vibrations or frequencies are innately understood via recieving minds. From my expereinces with Spirit, it was almost as if an entire sentence or key point was laid in my mind at the same time, to say the whole message was one thought, and was picked up by me in that way. hmmm Love and Light RE: The New Priesthood of Ra? - healthandhappiness - 07-15-2009 Hallo, May I join in! There is a time when people will view and know that there are different levels to be expericenced. One not better or less, just different. This is also with training. One starts life as a baby. Is that life expression any less than an 80 year old? No, just in a different phase. So too with incremental systems: one starts at the beginning! Developing character of being in the even middle, in controle of emotions, that we stay there- is a training. When praise or blame don't affect us. We can be in control of your inner responses. With developing of maturity in knowingness, the ego's view of feeling more important than another will disappear. So follow your clariy of what is being shown. Know that with good intentions the people who feel drawn to join you will appear. When we are discussing communication is telepathy not natively 4D ? so written language at that point becomes obsolete. Thoughts however, also sometimes depicted as vibrations or frequencies are innately understood via recieving minds. From my expereinces with Spirit, it was almost as if an entire sentence or key point was laid in my mind at the same time, to say the whole message was one thought, and was picked up by me in that way. May I join in! Yvonne is the my name. Once upon a time we communicated telepathically, but when decending into human manifestation and we forgot how to communicate in this way. We had to learn to tone, words, sounds as the new form of communication. Now in these times we are remembering that words are tones of creation. Thoughts - words creat. We have four bodies and we are receivers. We "get" the whole picture of meaning also intuitively via our connectedness with the one mind. It is a knowing. Just as more and more people are channeling. Concerning numbers, breathing and expansion in your being: check out www.ronnastar.com Infinity breath, binary sequencing exercise. Greetings in the light of Love RE: The New Priesthood of Ra? - Sirius - 07-15-2009 (07-15-2009, 04:20 AM)healthandhappiness Wrote: . From my expereinces with Spirit, it was almost as if an entire sentence or key point was laid in my mind at the same time, to say the whole message was one thought, and was picked up by me in that way. I can totaly relate to this. Welcome to bring4th ![]() RE: The New Priesthood of Ra? - ymunio - 08-16-2009 A priesthood of Ra? That would be contradictory. That would imply hierarchy, secrecy, re-interpretation, "better than" Not that contradiction has stopped others who felt a similar calling. But I would think in this case it would at least be slower to manifest. Maybe a priesthood is inevitable in this density. Such is the destiny of channeled information on this planet, which I don't understand. Maybe I'm shortsighted. Maybe a priesthood will be better for all involved, *in the long run.* But I'll just say with love that I have no interest in the idea. RE: The New Priesthood of Ra? - paddy - 09-22-2009 There is a Tibetan mantra called the "Kalachakra". When I read about the history of this mantra, there was mention of the "Ra Lineage" as a portion of its history. Possibly the naming so shares some symbolic connection to a Tibetan priesthood. Of course such symbolic sounding links may be too numerous to mention because the sound Ra seems everywhere. So why mention this here? Well, Ra seems very ancient in human years, and so this Kalachakra related Ra Lineage may be relatively new in Ra years. So this Ra Lineage may be "The New Priesthood of Ra". Also, some of the Tibetans are regarded as highly adept spiritually. This is another reason I mention it, out of respect for their spiritual adeptness. paddy RE: The New Priesthood of Ra? - Ens Entium - 11-11-2010 Hi all This shouldn't be too much of a problem if the school were run in a transparent manner. Something where the proceeds of the school were openly and freely released to the public. Where the goings on could be monitored or at least be made publicly known. I say this because all those out there with concern for such an institution could uphold the general principles- which i assume everyone is familiar with. Also, something that is kept simple, maybe where there is offering to the degree of demand. I think there'll always be demand for teaching especially as more people catch ont ot these timeless teachings. This would od course require that those offering service to such an institution be able to do o flexibly. So an online format with individual and or group coaching/teahing could be a possible structure. A 'flat structure would avoid the STS concerns some may have. A small concluding note. This, i think, is a topic that will become important in future as people will want to be caught up expeditiously. Regards to all Kyle This is a slightly different angle than the previous post. IMO, it's not necessary to have a priesthood when conveying this type of material; the material and other related elaboratory material is freely available. The idea of a priesthood is also outdated. I understand that there would naturally be leaders, especially with regard to teaching indigo level concepts, techniques, practices, etc and some of the more advanced stuff. So this would most comfortably be a set up where there are leaders, but with a more relaxed atmosphere of learn/teaching and teach/learning. I may be making a moot point here in that we have something very close to this in the form of this forum. Direct, person-to-person teaching is a very effiecient system though- there needs to be space for this. Lastly, a view to our future casts interesting light on this possibility. I think that as humanity brings 4th density into manifestation into the culture more strongly, we'd need a format that can duplicated across the world, a format that accords with 4D positive principles and that can handle and nuture the increasing needs of students who will need and offer sharing of knowledge and application of things that will be coming forth ( ![]() The relationship between humainity's onward march into trye colour green and the educational needs and learning/research opportunities makes it a very interesting subject. What do you think? Regards Kyle RE: The New Priesthood of Ra? - unity100 - 11-11-2010 it would inevitably spiral down to what happened to the catholic church, or scholastic science. this planetary society has a lot of regressive, possessive yellow/orange undertones. that eventually spoils everything. such a thing only could have a chance of going on untainted when this problem is no longer around. however that would mean the 4th d would have come, and at that point there would be no need for such a school, or such teachers, for anyone will be connected with the ether. RE: The New Priesthood of Ra? - Namaste - 11-11-2010 Always follow your passion. Listen to your inner guidance. It doesn't matter if 1, 10, 100 or 1000 people are telling you otherwise, as true inner guidance will only bring more light to the world. One thing to take into consideration when starting or opening a new group is that objective material is subjectively interpreted. People take different meanings from the same messages. Who's opinion takes precedence? This is where the majority of 'ego collisions' occur, and can easily create levels of hierarchy. To combat this, one needs an open system in which any member may openly, and without judgement, offer an opinion regarding a particular subject, in which everybody contemplates. Action is taken as an equal group. Easier said than done, as some people are influenced by others easily and hence, true balance is hindered. Remember, one can act as a beacon of light regardless of the form of service. Love can be chosen and radiated at any, and every, moment in the eternal now. Do this to the best of your ability and your service to humanity will be of upmost value. This is the power that true masters have; their inner radiance attracts those to them who seek their help. Yogi's often wander the world without a formal structure of teaching, following only guidance from the heart/higher self. Churches, religion, spiritual orders and all of that have one thing in common; formal structure. Here, spirituality is easily distorted. True spirituality, at it's essence, is living with integrity, making choices aligned with your own truths, while at the same time honouring and accepting the truths of others. One cannot be more spiritual than that :¬) Peace brother, and all the best with your endeavours of discovering more of yourself. RE: The New Priesthood of Ra? - turtledude23 - 11-11-2010 The Law of One is all about accepting your self as you are, being your self, and logical philosophy, that's why I love it, there's very little dogmatic stuff in the books, most of it could be logically deduced on your own after many many years of deep thought. Making a religion out of it would be making a mould for people to conform to, the people professing the mold will get ego boosts and the people conforming to it will not be thinking for themselves. This is totally against Ra's emphasis on free will. RE: The New Priesthood of Ra? - Ens Entium - 12-08-2010 Hey, The post was named, i think, specifically in that way so that the idea of the traditional priesthood could be held in juxtapostion to the 'ethos' of the Law of One. Indeed, the Priesthood in Egypt was the demise of the Law of One philosophy there. The structure of a priesthood engenders hierachy and this opens up can of worms labelled "Ego". As unity 100 has said.. "this planetary society has a lot of regressive, possessive yellow/orange undertones. that eventually spoils everything". I must say the obvious though, this only applies if the people in such a body are susceptible. The dynamic contrast produced by holding the above situation in mind, next to the Law of One has the unique effect of bringing things into sharper definition for me- both ends of the spectrum people have spoken about. I found reading through this to be quite helpful. Ther are still the questions that are raised by the possibility of groups of people deciding by their own free will to create and participate in this. The key seems to be that, it will be different from the usual 'religious'/dogmatic set up in that one is still free to seek as one chooses. Also, by definition, the LOO inplies that the truth lies within! This grants a freedom and a promise (and a responsibility) that belongs to the individual. There are no conduits! It is in this, and from this understanding that, hopefully, people can share and learn from. Lastly, we will not enter 4th density in full swing in the near future. In the mean time (100-200 years) centres of learning and teaching with the LOO as its backbone will become more important. The discussion here is great.. ![]() Sincerest regards RE: The New Priesthood of Ra? - unity100 - 12-08-2010 (12-08-2010, 08:35 PM)Ens Entium Wrote: "this planetary society has a lot of regressive, possessive yellow/orange undertones. that eventually spoils everything". I must say the obvious though, this only applies if the people in such a body are susceptible. that is right, however there is the issue of the effect of the society on the priesthood. even if the lineup of entities in those bodies are not susceptible to such ego issues, they may eventually get dragged down by the focused attention of the societal mind, constantly overloading them with ego related distortions. even if it doesnt drag them down, they may eventually change into such an order because of the members dying out, and less pure members coming into the ranks. i very much suspect this is the way a lot of organizations that were started with good intent, deteriorated into negativistic hierarchies. |