![]() |
Dangling Threads in LOO series - Printable Version +- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums) +-- Forum: Bring4th Studies (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Strictly Law of One Material (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Dangling Threads in LOO series (/showthread.php?tid=75) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - Monica - 01-14-2009 (01-14-2009, 09:30 PM)3D Sunset Wrote:(01-14-2009, 08:21 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: Ra says that those who were destroyed by the energy release found their spirit complexes "to be completely disarranged without possibility of re-integration." 3D, I agree totally! Excellent explanation! A few additional comments: 1. For something to be 'disarranged' implies that it still exists...just in a different form. If it were annihilated, it seems that Ra would have used a term like 'destroyed' ...but Ra said 'disarranged.' 2. Just as we have work to do in our present incarnation, the entities of the higher densities serve the Creator in ways we cannot comprehend. It might sound kinda iffy to us "Oh wow, what if they miss? Our souls could get destroyed?" but I think we should remember that entities who are millions of years more advanced than us might consider the catching of a spirit complex and reintegrating it to be child's play. Important work, but not likely something they will fail at. I really think we can trust that our spirit complexes are in good hands, should such a disaster ever occur. 3. Ra indicated that losing a spirit complex would be losing a part of the Creator, and the Creator doesn't want that. As a dear Christian friend of mine so eloguently stated, "What God wants, God gets." 3D vehicles seem to be of little consequence, but we're talking about the spirit complex here!! Ra, in the service of the One Infinite Creator, is not going to let something so valuable be lost just because some wacked-out STS entities pushed the button. I agree that it's irrelevant as to whether they would have been lost without Ra's intervention; the point is that they WEREN'T lost and would not be lost were it to happen again. 4. A nuclear blast is apparently not the only thing that can mess up a spirit complex. Remember, Hitler's soul got rearranged, due to his extreme confusion and intense mixture of polarity...a good example of what can happen when the higher chakras are opened while bypassing the heart, in conjunction with some messed-up ideas and insanity. (As an aside, I wonder where that soul is now? Not a question Q'uo is likely to answer, that's for sure!) RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - βαθμιαίος - 01-14-2009 (01-14-2009, 09:30 PM)3D Sunset Wrote: Hi βαθμιαίος (I could use some help with the pronunciation here), It's funny, I seem to get that response a lot ![]() βαθμιαίος β = Beta = B a = alpha = a θ = theta = th μ = mu = m i = iota = i a = alpha = a i = iota = i o = omicron = o ς = sigma = s So all together it's Bathmiaios, which means (I hope!) step by step. (01-14-2009, 09:30 PM)3D Sunset Wrote: As a simple example of why I feel this way, I find it absolutely incomprehensible that the Higher Self would be remotely affected by it's 3D incarnation's proximity to a nuclear bomb. I see why you say that but I think we'll have to agree to disagree. Or perhaps I should say, let's agree that it's a dangling thread ![]() (01-14-2009, 10:25 PM)DreamingPeace Wrote: 1. For something to be 'disarranged' implies that it still exists...just in a different form. If it were annihilated, it seems that Ra would have used a term like 'destroyed' ...but Ra said 'disarranged.' We must have been posting at the same time. I don't disagree with the substance of your comments, that we are in good hands and can trust the process. And I don't think you'll disagree that should nuclear war occur it would be quite traumatic. I hope you won't think me quibbling if I point out that Ra did use the word "destroyed" when they referred to "those who were destroyed ... by the energy release." Really, though, it's a moot point. Perhaps the entities would have ceased to exist or maybe just one incarnation's experiences would have been lost. Either way it's pretty bad and we can be grateful to Ra that they intervened, and we can also take their implied suggestion to "attempt feelings of love towards the planetary sphere and comfort and healing of the scars and the imbalances of these actions." RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - βαθμιαίος - 01-15-2009 (01-14-2009, 09:30 PM)3D Sunset Wrote: There is, as is frequently the case with Ra, some room for interpretation of what exactly he meant by the phrase "unique vibratory complex you have called the spirit complex, which we understand as a mind/body/spirit complex" when he refers to what was "completely disarranged" by the blast. To me, this is addressing the spirit complex that is a portion of the Higher Self and is tied into the unique 3D mind/body of that incarnation. This gets into an entirely different discussion about the relationship between the Higher Self, or ageless spirit and the "spirit" of an incarnational instance of the Higher Self. Some people believe that they are one in the same, I am of the opinion that there are a number of spirits, simultaneously at various levels of spiritual evolution distinct from the spirit of the 3D mind/body/spirit complex and the Higher self. Distinct from, yet wholely conatined in the Higher Self. (Sorry, if this is getting rather esoteric). I fully intended to let this discussion rest, because I'm fine with disagreeing. However, since I do love a good Law of One debate with knowledgeable participants, and since I had an interesting, relevant discussion last night... I was talking with my son, who is thirteen and wise beyond his years, about this question and he said, basically, "well, the higher self is you in the future. So if you are destroyed now, you never become your higher self. It's like the time travel conundrum where you go into the past and kill your grandfather. Do you still exist?" RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - 3D Sunset - 01-15-2009 (01-14-2009, 10:28 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: It's funny, I seem to get that response a lot Thanks for that. You may find it funny or perhaps candid, but I found myself pronouncing it "Bucolic". ![]() Quote:I see why you say that but I think we'll have to agree to disagree. Or perhaps I should say, let's agree that it's a dangling thread No need for agreement, or disagreement. We are all here to share, learn/teach and teach/learn. I am happy just to be a part of it. Also, please don't take any of my statements as being my view of Eternal truths. They are interpretations and I know they are subject to all the distortions of 3D existence. In reality, the most any of us can do is look into the mirror darkly, and I'm certain that even my most strongly held beliefs are but pale reflections of their associated Eternal truths. Quote:Really, though, it's a moot point. Perhaps the entities would have ceased to exist or maybe just one incarnation's experiences would have been lost. Either way it's pretty bad and we can be grateful to Ra that they intervened, and we can also take their implied suggestion to "attempt feelings of love towards the planetary sphere and comfort and healing of the scars and the imbalances of these actions." I agree completely, and feel that this is the ultimate lesson in the story. Love and Light, 3D Sunset RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - 3D Sunset - 01-15-2009 DreamingPeace Wrote:Remember, Hitler's soul got rearranged, due to his extreme confusion and intense mixture of polarity... (As an aside, I wonder where that soul is now? Not a question Q'uo is likely to answer, that's for sure!) Quote:Ra, Book I, Session 11, Ask and ye shall receive, 3D Sunset RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - Monica - 01-15-2009 (01-15-2009, 03:04 PM)3D Sunset Wrote: Ask and ye shall receive,Oh yeah, I remember that now...I remembered he needed healing but had forgotten where he ended up. Thanks! RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - βαθμιαίος - 01-16-2009 sos posted an interesting question that I think qualifies as a dangling thread on the length of time for third density on various planets and whether it is tied to the precession of the equinoxes. RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - βαθμιαίος - 02-03-2009 Another dangling thread I'm curious about: Ra said that the one known as Lucifer can be seen as the true light-bringer. Is there actually a being named Lucifer, or is it instead a principle/idea/concept? RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - Horizon - 02-03-2009 (02-03-2009, 01:04 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: Another dangling thread I'm curious about: Ra said that the one known as Lucifer can be seen as the true light-bringer. Is there actually a being named Lucifer, or is it instead a principle/idea/concept? Hello B ![]() If what I read posted in another UFO type forum, via a person who calls himself Helping Hand, he is associated with the memory group Lucifer. They claim to be persuing a negative harvest. He claimed that that they needed a negative harvest to offset their karma, and that they were one of the primary bloodlines at the capstone of the Illuminati bloodline. I believe he mentioned the Orion group there too. L&L RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - βαθμιαίος - 02-03-2009 Yeah, I have some idea of what Hidden Hand says, but I'd be much more interested in what Ra had to say! RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - Horizon - 02-03-2009 (02-03-2009, 06:53 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: Yeah, I have some idea of what Hidden Hand says, but I'd be much more interested in what Ra had to say! I read the entire thread on that site, and it did coincide with many things I read in LOO, although I think HH was looking to rally support for 4D-. I am much more interested in what Ra says, yet I felt compelled to follow that thread.... just so that I could understand both sides. I'm still on Ra's side though ![]() RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - 3D Sunset - 02-03-2009 (02-03-2009, 01:04 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: Another dangling thread I'm curious about: Ra said that the one known as Lucifer can be seen as the true light-bringer. Is there actually a being named Lucifer, or is it instead a principle/idea/concept? I believe that this quote addresses your question: Quote:Ra, Book IV, Session 84 This is consistent with other non-Ra sources I've read through the years. In another sense, one could see Lucifer as the Logos who first conceived of the veil, since this is the source of STS polarization. Food for thought, 3D Sunset RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - βαθμιαίος - 02-03-2009 Interesting. The mention of a mythic figure with an erection made me think of the Matrix of the Spirit. But of course there's no light in that image, only darkness. The light doesn't come until the Potentiator of the Spirit. Do you think the mythical figure in the Matrix can be said to bring the light by emphasizing its absence? I googled Lucifer and ended up at the wikipedia page, which includes this fascinating tidbit: "In Latin, the word "Lucifer", meaning "Light-Bringer" (from lux, lucis, "light", and ferre, "to bear, bring"), is a name for the "Morning Star" (the planet Venus in its dawn appearances)." So perhaps Ra themselves can be thought of as Luciferian (and I'm sure they are thought of that way by some.) One last tidbit from the wikipedia page that's interesting for those of us who have a fondness for Greek: the Greek word for Lucifer is "Φωσφόρος" (phosphoros). One thing I've never been clear on is whether Lucifer and Satan are supposed to be one entity or two. I have no problem thinking of Satan as evil. I believe the name comes from the Egyptian "Set". But it's hard to think of anyone whose name means light bringer as purely evil. (I hope that's not too blasphemous a thought for this forum.) RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - 3D Sunset - 02-04-2009 (02-03-2009, 09:49 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: One thing I've never been clear on is whether Lucifer and Satan are supposed to be one entity or two. I have no problem thinking of Satan as evil. I believe the name comes from the Egyptian "Set". But it's hard to think of anyone whose name means light bringer as purely evil. (I hope that's not too blasphemous a thought for this forum.) Hi βαθμιαίος, After some investigation, I would recommend this link http://www.s8int.com/lucifer.html as the best explanation I can find about the distinction between Satan and Lucifer in the King James Bible (KJB). Bottom line is that it concludes that they are two different entities, or better stated that there is only one reference to Lucifer in the KJB, and it is actually a reference to the morning star, Venus. That said, I think that when Ra refers to Lucifer, he is referring to a composite of mythological characters throughout human history that were responsible for bringing "light" to the world including (to name but a few) Prometheus to the Greeks, Mahasura to the Hindus, and Loki to the Scandinavian. Indeed, every religion has its equivalent figure. It is also interesting, I think, to note that there is no reference to Satan in any of the five books or 106 sessions of the Law of One, and Lucifer is mentioned only twice. I take this as some indication of the amount of human distortion Ra saw associated with the very concept of Satan. From my own perspective, I see Satan as the human metaphor for "evil", which could only exist after the concept of good/evil were give to mankind as described in the biblical Garden of Eden story. So to me, you could say that it was Lucifer that gave the knowledge of good and evil (and hence our entire dualistic existence) to mankind. Once the duality existed, we have Satan to personify the evil, and various prophets (Daniel, Jesus, Buddha, Mohammad, etc.) to personify the good, with God overseeing them all. And now for my blasphemy, I think that it is then our logos' STO bias, tinged with STS distortions that creates our perception that we need to "control" our "evil" side. In reality there is no good or evil, there is just the Infinite Creator experiencing himself, and we are all simply enthusiastic participants in that glorious dance. This is not to say that we should go out and wantonly perform "evil" acts. Certainly, we must not infringe on others' free will (or risk a loss in our own polarization and harvestability), and it is quite unlikely that many of us could forgive ourselves for causing harm to others even if we acted within their free will (thus creating karma that also binds us to 3D). Still, I do believe that is the underlying message from Ra about the equivalence between STS and STO. They are both sides of the same coin, with equal stature to the One Infinite Creator. Enough rambling for now, Love and Light(bearing), 3D Sunset RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - paddy - 09-23-2009 Quote:...Still, I do believe that is the underlying message from Ra about the equivalence between STS and STO. They are both sides of the same coin, with equal stature to the One Infinite Creator.... Maybe the equivalence suggested is like a junction at a crossroads where one has a blind choice to go left or a blind choice to go right. So being blind one makes a choice and goes in some direction. After a while it either works out with no need to change course, or else it doesn't work out with a need to turn around and go back to the crossroads in order to go the other way to make progress. Another way to interpret the equivalence may be to consider one style as offering contrast to another style in order to better grasp the relativistic differences. So our experiences with the dysfunctional ways may allow us to better appreciate the functional ways when we experience them, as if we can't have one without the other. A pattern from nature may apply, that of predator and prey. When the predator eats the prey, then the prey becomes the predator by assimilation which is an equivalence of sorts. As all the prey disappears, then the predators are left with nothing to eat but each other until the last one dies alone from starvation. Then the prey and predators are all gone, and another equivalence is reached within that nothingness, neither is around. The predators and prey share their history of interaction, which is another equivalence, and so on. paddy RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - Lavazza - 02-02-2010 (01-09-2009, 01:42 PM)3D Sunset Wrote: Oh! Another Law of confusion occurred to me. When Don was asking about the creation of the atomic bomb, Ra mentioned that most of the developers of the bomb were fairly polarized to STO, but said that there was one significant exception who he refrained from naming because he was still alive. It's funny, but the first time I read that, I immediately thought of Edward Teller (father of the Hydrogen bomb), who did recently die. It might be interesting to get a confirmation of that from Q'uo. In looking at Teller's life, it's certainly easy to place him in the STS role. I'm reading through some old threads today ![]() I did a quick look up of Edward Teller... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Teller From what I can tell, Mr. Teller was an outspoken advocate of nuclear energy / nuclear weapons for his entire professional career and life after they were developed. He even proposed using them to mine huge portions of land in order to create artificial water bodies. And at another point he coerced politicians in to not signing non-nuclear proliferation treaties. Yes, it does sound like Teller is at least leaning in the direction of STS. I don't know if he falls under the category of 'extremely STS polarized though', at least in comparison to other entities that we know were STS polarized, such as Himmler and Kahn. Thoughts anyone? RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - AnthroHeart - 02-02-2010 Wasn't Lucifer a watery planet that fell to Earth some years ago? I think I saw that in the Esoteric Agenda but I'm not exactly sure which source. RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - Questioner - 02-02-2010 I'm a little confused on the theme. By "loose ends" do you mean topics that Ra or Don brought up, but there wasn't a follow up discussion for Ra to explain fully? Is the idea to list these topics, then see if later LLR channelling addressed these topics more fully? Based on earlier discussions I imagine that outside channeling sources are outside the rules. Are the follow-ups to the dangling topics strictly from LLR material, or can we bring in our own interpretations, thoughts, feelings, meditations etc. to explore our own experiences? RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - kylissa - 02-14-2010 Doing a bit of study into free will today and I think I found one of the "dangling" statements... Ra refuses to guide us on the invocation of "a great mass of light strength" here: "Ra: I am Ra. The Law of Confusion or Free Will is utterly paramount in the workings of the infinite creation. That which is intended has as much intensity of attraction to the polar opposite as the intensity of the intention or desire. Thus those whose desires are shallow or transitory experience only ephemeral configurations of what might be called the magical circumstance. There is a turning point, a fulcrum which swings as a mind/body/spirit complex tunes its will to service. If this will and desire is for service-to-others the corresponding polarity will be activated. In the circumstance of this group there are three such wills acting as one with the instrument in the, shall we say, central position of fidelity to service. This is as it must be for the balance of the working and the continuance of the contact. Our vibratory complex is one-pointed in these workings also and our will to serve is also of some degree of purity. This has created the attraction of the polar opposite which you experience. We may note that such a configuration of free will, one-pointed in service-to-others, also has the potential for the alerting of a great mass of light strength. This positive light strength, however, operates also under free will and must be invoked. We could not speak to this and shall not guide you, for the nature of this contact is such that the purity of your free will must, above all things, be preserved. Thus you wend your way through experiences discovering those biases which may be helpful." RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - Cyclops - 02-14-2010 Could this light strength be this? since when you serve with a pure intent you alert the other polarity which then may work to snuff out positve service.. and at the same time "one-pointed in service-to-others, also has the potential for the alerting of a great mass of light strength. This positive light strength".. now lets look at this potential. There is in the Ra material and the Q'uo sessions the writing of how service to others seeking in a group alerts inner and outer beings which lend their light to the already somewhat created light of the incarnated group. Quote:To this modest gathering have—we correct thisQ'uo To then invoke this you must willfully know this and ask all the entities which lend their light to gather others?? Quote:For a great portion of your last major cycle ofQ'uo This is only a speculation about the great mass of light strength that Ra had mentioned. RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - Brad N - 03-15-2010 [quote='βαθμιαίος' pid='496' dateline='1231548312'] I love the premise of this thread. One of the biggest dangling threads is the archetypical mind, specifically the body, the spirit, and the choice. There's many sessions worth of questions there. Good-day. I am glad to see the interest in continuing the archetype study this is a central study for myself as well and one I would love to elaborate on. On card six Ra encourages Don to explore the two echos of the shape of the crossed arms and I'm sure this is a dangling thread that we could explore. Transformation of the mind to me is a comittment to a direction of the choice and opens the door to the way. This is a turning point yet the rocking back and forth seems necessary to appreciate all aspects before (abandoning one path) to persue fully the other. I appreciate this topic and further archetype study. Thank you. RE: Dangling Threads in LOO series - Brad N - 03-16-2010 Good evening! Here is one for the day to pick on if you-all are interested: Quote:Session 78 Quote:Session 92. I will try to digest that a little and give you-all a chance to join. This is great and I leave you all in love. |