![]() |
divinecosmos hacked again - Printable Version +- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums) +-- Forum: Bring4th Community (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=16) +--- Forum: Olio (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: divinecosmos hacked again (/showthread.php?tid=2385) |
RE: divinecosmos hacked again - Derek - 03-15-2011 Few? David has thousands and thousands of fans. I know many, through facebook, myspace, various message boards, and other forms of networking. This again is another form of projection. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection Your projecting your personal opinion (that he has a big ego) onto everyone else in the alternative community, assuming that they all too think that he has "a giant ego" RE: divinecosmos hacked again - 3DMonkey - 03-15-2011 I Was being kind by not assuming he sleeps around. RE: divinecosmos hacked again - Derek - 03-15-2011 (03-15-2011, 06:00 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: I Was being kind by not assuming he sleeps around. He has been celibate for years. If he was lying (ie not following his personal teachings) he would have received massive psychic greeting by now that would have completely destroyed his career or something else catastrophic. This is how all channeling works (read The Channelers Handbook by Carla Rueckart). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection RE: divinecosmos hacked again - 3DMonkey - 03-15-2011 I know you aren't upset with me. You are upset with the idea of bashing Someone you respect. I haven't done that. Everyone has posted something positive about David. Except one, and as I stand in your corner, I say save yourself and don't tango with that. RE: divinecosmos hacked again - Derek - 03-15-2011 (03-15-2011, 06:11 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: I know you aren't upset with me. You are upset with the idea of bashing Someone you respect. I haven't done that. Everyone has posted something positive about David. Except one, and as I stand in your corner, I say save yourself and don't tango with that. Listen, I am not upset with you. It is frustrating though when I see people casually attacking people such as David Wilcock and others who have awakened so many people and in Davids case, widely popularized the Law of One series. If someone could provide evidence of him being an "egomaniac" I would consider that. If someone is going to attack and accuse based on zero evidence, and complete assumption and opinion (which I can provide evidence against) it can be frustrating. This happens with other people as well. You were not the only one to say anything about David in this thread. RE: divinecosmos hacked again - Ocean - 03-15-2011 to say he's human is not an insult. i for one don't presume to know anything about his ego. i love him for being a beautiful soul, i can see it radiating from him. i always feel good when watching him. you can see the love and honesty when he talks, imo, and i do think he is very humble. and i do think he would have been getting major greeting if he wasn't. but we should always be careful about putting people on pedestals, he himself says he doesn't want that. RE: divinecosmos hacked again - Derek - 03-15-2011 (03-15-2011, 06:33 PM)Ocean Wrote: to say he's human is not an insult. i for one don't presume to know anything about his ego. i love him for being a beautiful soul, i can see it radiating from him. i always feel good when watching him. you can see the love and honesty when he talks, imo, and i do think he is very humble. and i do think he would have been getting major greeting if he wasn't. but we should always be careful about putting people on pedestals, he himself says he doesn't want that. I couldn't agree more with everything you said ![]() RE: divinecosmos hacked again - seejay21 - 03-15-2011 David will be David. He's made some money selling his wares, but that isn't such a bad thing. I consider him the "CNN" of Awareness. He's probably reached more people with his method than any other new age celeb. RE: divinecosmos hacked again - Ocean - 03-15-2011 well he does have to live and he does work really hard. someone who works really hard doing something that benefits nobody is more free to spend their money on giant palaces in people's eyes. when someone like David who actually gives most of his stuff free and works hard to help people somehow is supposed to be wearing rags and eating wild berries. ![]() RE: divinecosmos hacked again - unity100 - 03-15-2011 (03-15-2011, 04:08 PM)Derek Wrote: Here is a repost from another thread. I hope to put those assumptions at rest. no, unfortunately they dont. he talks a lot about himself. even in the supposed Ra channeling transcripts i read, stuff like 'oh, i wouldnt have you any other way' fires away, regarding his own self. the channeled source (supposedly Ra) is telling that to him. the Ra which used terms like 'this instrument' for Carla, 'questioner' for don, is bursting out in an orange/yellow filled exclamation, to david's persona. let me go out on a limb and say he was channeling his own higher self or his totality at that time. then, this would mean that he is in need of appeasement of his own self, and therefore receiving communication as such. you wont have any kind of appeasement/aggrandizement of ANYone's self, in Ra material, under no condition. Quote:The basic idea is that feeling positively about yourself, writing articles in first-person tense with stories from your own life's journey, pursuing greater exposure and offering products so you can afford to keep doing your best to reach people, is a bad thing. being too indulged in one's own self, is an yellow ray manifestation. (correction : yellow ray manifestation) and as for 'greater exposure and offering products', here : http://lawofone.info/results.php?session_id=62&sc=1&ss=1#23 Quote:62.23 Questioner: Isn’t this unusual that a fifth-density entity then would bother to do this rather than sending a fourth-density servant, shall I say? his attempt to redefine ego, and somehow exempt being overindulged in his own SELF, as opposed to well being of everyone (leaving aside others), is a sign of having an ego. im totally leaving out the 'products' and aggrandizement of self or organization part, as told in above. so, in the 10 years that passed, ra has started to use channels that appease themselves or others, also entertaining specific information, through a channel which channels conspiracy theories and whatnot, not to mention selling great products by extra exposure ? the Ra which has answered that any kind of 'advertisement' through ufo phenomenon was undesirable, because using law of attraction was more proper ? Quote:Thus, we start with the instrument and we proceed therefrom, touching with the instrument’s mind again, and then again, as we scan—we will correct this instrument—as we scan the minds of those within the circle to find what they may wish to listen to. it took a few lifetimes, among many groups, for ll group to be able to channel Ra, and it was only doable through unconscious channeling. not to mention that, this contact had to end after don's death. because the contact was maintained due to harmony in between the three, who had spent apparently more than one life together in preparation for this. now, someone who is channeling information totally contrary to what Ra has cautioned against, acting in a manner Ra warned against, is, consciously channeling Ra, alone .... RE: divinecosmos hacked again - Ocean - 03-15-2011 David's products are mostly science not channeling, i think. what he is is a researcher. why can't he have that as a product? are you saying Ra is a negative entity or that David does not channel Ra? the schedule module is missing. i just went to divinecosmos. RE: divinecosmos hacked again - 3DMonkey - 03-15-2011 Yeah, I love all the science David puts out. I look the other way when he channels... or sings. I think David's best attribute is his ability to speak. That guy can discuss our favorite topics with just about anyone and be successful doing it. He is not easily tripped up in real time conversation, and in fact can peacefully stand his ground. I don't think he is going on Oprah anytime soon, but I would bet she has watched a video or two of his. RE: divinecosmos hacked again - Derek - 03-15-2011 (03-15-2011, 07:49 PM)unity100 Wrote:(03-15-2011, 04:08 PM)Derek Wrote: Here is a repost from another thread. I hope to put those assumptions at rest. Listen, this is the last time I'm going to respond to this. I appreciate your opinion, but I don't want to waste vital energy ![]() "Again, our goal is not to promote David or his works. David is one aspect of a much greater collective initiative, and it has many, many facets. Our goal is to reach the shoreline of your awareness, and set sail with a craft of our own design in collaboration with you – such that there is no need to worry about the future, or concern yourself with the frequency of available materials of any kind, whether they be David’s writings or otherwise." David constantly stresses that he doesn't want to be put on a pedestal. Quote:I'M NOT PERFECT The way he defined ego in that post is exactly how Carl Jung and many others define it. If he didn't have products he would not be on the internet. Nobody would know who he is and far fewer people would know about the Law of One. That is a fact. Davids Higher Self is part of the Ra social/memory/complex as are millions of other wanderers. RE: divinecosmos hacked again - Ocean - 03-15-2011 yeah he is a walking ad. and wow that car story was awesome. RE: divinecosmos hacked again - BlatzAdict - 03-15-2011 i'm two things right now. so sorry. i'm so sorry to you derek. please forgive me. yoink! lol and the 2nd thing... so i am with my partner here mr percy from usa. do you need some purses i can maybe sell to you. 2 for 1 but 3 for 2. you say that's not bad here's money to you. one is magenta and the other is blue. RE: divinecosmos hacked again - Ocean - 03-15-2011 ![]() RE: divinecosmos hacked again - Ankh - 03-16-2011 (03-15-2011, 09:26 PM)Derek Wrote: Davids Higher Self is part of the Ra social/memory/complex as are millions of other wanderers. Says who? EDIT: I am not trying to pick a fight here or mean it in any other negative sense, but is genuinely curious about who said that? RE: divinecosmos hacked again - Namaste - 03-16-2011 (03-16-2011, 04:29 AM)Ankh Wrote:(03-15-2011, 09:26 PM)Derek Wrote: Davids Higher Self is part of the Ra social/memory/complex as are millions of other wanderers. Yes, very interested in that also. Ra Wrote:14.5 Questioner: Was the Egyptian visit of 11,000 years ago the only one where you actually walked the Earth? Would this not include 3D incarnations (Wanderers), as at the core, it's still the essence of Ra? RE: divinecosmos hacked again - unity100 - 03-16-2011 (03-15-2011, 09:26 PM)Derek Wrote: Listen, this is the last time I'm going to respond to this. I appreciate your opinion, but I don't want to waste vital energy Smile The vast majority of those channelings are his own personal channelings that he was using for personal guidance. They are coming from his higher self and are about his life. Some of them contain inspiring material and prophecy, so he released them online. There are hundreds more he hasn't. The channelings he has released online for public only say things like this again, the endless amount of personal-related stuff in any of the things he channels, means that he has an overindulgence in his own self. providing and producing reasons for it does not change that fact. i have given you direct link to Ra quote about aggrandizement of self/organization reducing polarity of the channeler. Quote:The way he defined ego in that post is exactly how Carl Jung and many others define it. david's or carl gustav jung's definition of ego, is not relevant to spiritual definition of ego. a good link to the definition of ego related manifestations was, again, given by a link to Ra material. (03-16-2011, 04:29 AM)Ankh Wrote:(03-15-2011, 09:26 PM)Derek Wrote: Davids Higher Self is part of the Ra social/memory/complex as are millions of other wanderers. david himself of course. the 60 million crowded Ra social memory complex has shown their approach to channeling with the work they undertaken with ll group. and that, isnt at parallels with what this person is doing, or saying. RE: divinecosmos hacked again - Namaste - 03-16-2011 (03-16-2011, 07:10 AM)unity100 Wrote:(03-16-2011, 04:29 AM)Ankh Wrote:(03-15-2011, 09:26 PM)Derek Wrote: Davids Higher Self is part of the Ra social/memory/complex as are millions of other wanderers. This is exactly why David's Ra channeling doesn't resonate with me, it doesn't fit with the core reason of how and why the core team and harmony of L/L Research yielded the Ra Material. I do find DW's non-channelled work invaluable, however. He being of great service to humanity :¬) RE: divinecosmos hacked again - yossarian - 03-16-2011 the whole point is that David is not channeling Ra the Social Memory Complex He's channeling one individual who happens to be a part of that Social Memory Complex this is different There are likely millions of wanderers on the Earth with higher selves from Ra, right? David talks to his higher self with conscious channeling, he doesn't use unconscious channeling to talk to Ra the social memory complex. So of course the material is different. The source is different and the channeller is different. He doesn't claim to channel the same Ra from The Ra Material. It's a different Ra. RE: divinecosmos hacked again - Ankh - 03-16-2011 (03-16-2011, 07:10 AM)unity100 Wrote: 60 million crowded Ra social memory complex Another thing that gets me confused. Didn't Ra mention that they were 6,5 million that graduated from 3D? And even if non graduates at the time of the Great Harvest graduated some place else later, and could join Ra: s early 4D+ society they were still approximately 32 millions at that time, right? Just wonder if there some classified information somewhere that I didn't get the memo of? ![]() (03-16-2011, 07:46 AM)Namaste Wrote: I do find DW's non-channelled work invaluable, however. He being of great service to humanity :¬) That is probably most important to remember. If people are being helped by David's work - hey! Nice going and thank you for being of service, right? And if the word Ra is what catches the intention and helps others self grow - I don't think that Ra would mind, that word is not a trademark. ![]() RE: divinecosmos hacked again - unity100 - 03-16-2011 (03-16-2011, 07:47 AM)yossarian Wrote: the whole point is that David is not channeling Ra the Social Memory Complex a 6d society complex is something that is greatly harmonized. you cant just break away and act against the collective will of the complex you belong to, and engage in a manner that is contrary to the collective will. ra was at a point of addressing them as 'i am Ra' - meaning that 60 million souls were acting together, thinking together to that extent. not 'we are Ra' even. remember that, one of the reasons why wanderers incarnate in 3d planets is that their society complex may decide that the wanderer needs a lesson revisited. so, basically, a society complex has as much effect and clout on a wanderer. this means, it wouldnt be possible for a part of that society complex to go against the collective will of the complex and still remain a part of that complex. meaning, david wilcock cannot be channeling Ra in any interpretation. i doubt that, at the point of late 6d, any entity would leave their society complex, for david wilcock to be a breakaway entity which left its society complex, and therefore channeling his 'higher self'. also wanderers do not have higher selves. society complex, or, totality of the wanderer or the totality of the society complex, acts as higher self. RE: divinecosmos hacked again - Ankh - 03-16-2011 (03-16-2011, 07:47 AM)yossarian Wrote: the whole point is that David is not channeling Ra the Social Memory Complex 17.13 Questioner: When I am communicating with you as Ra, are you at times individualized as an entity or am I speaking to an entire social memory complex? Ra: I am Ra. You speak with Ra. There is no separation. You would call it social memory complex thus indicating many-ness. To our understanding, you are speaking to an individualized portion of consciousness. (03-16-2011, 07:47 AM)yossarian Wrote: There are likely millions of wanderers on the Earth with higher selves from Ra, right? David talks to his higher self with conscious channeling, he doesn't use unconscious channeling to talk to Ra the social memory complex. So of course the material is different. The source is different and the channeller is different. It is not stated somewhere that there are ANY Ra Wanderers incarnated on Earth. And if so, if it would that way, they are still subjects to 3D rules, and there is no difference between them or any other 6D Wanderer/or anyone else who can access the Higher Self, as Higher Self is a mid 6D Being. RE: divinecosmos hacked again - yossarian - 03-16-2011 (03-16-2011, 08:05 AM)unity100 Wrote: a 6d society complex is something that is greatly harmonized. you cant just break away and act against the collective will of the complex you belong to, and engage in a manner that is contrary to the collective will. Who are you saying is acting against the collective will exactly? Quote:ra was at a point of addressing them as 'i am Ra' - meaning that 60 million souls were acting together, thinking together to that extent. not 'we are Ra' even. I'm down with that interpretation, but still, I don't think that is conclusive. Quote:remember that, one of the reasons why wanderers incarnate in 3d planets is that their society complex may decide that the wanderer needs a lesson revisited. so, basically, a society complex has as much effect and clout on a wanderer. this means, it wouldnt be possible for a part of that society complex to go against the collective will of the complex and still remain a part of that complex. Who is going against the collective will? Quote:meaning, david wilcock cannot be channeling Ra in any interpretation. i doubt that, at the point of late 6d, any entity would leave their society complex, for david wilcock to be a breakaway entity which left its society complex, and therefore channeling his 'higher self'. also wanderers do not have higher selves. society complex, or, totality of the wanderer or the totality of the society complex, acts as higher self. Wandering doesn't mean leaving the complex. Wanderers reunite with their complex after graduation. It seems like you're just saying that Ra never wandered to earth. I believe this is incorrect. The collective will of a complex respects the individual wills of the members. The collective will of the complex is that the individuals serve the creator in the way they are called to do so. The harmonizing factor in an SMC is not the specific way each individual chooses to serve but rather the vibration of the service. I never saw anything in the LOO books to indicate that there are no wanderers from Ra or that individuals in the complex don't individually wander. Ra heavily implied that Akhenaten was a wanderer from the SMC of Ra. My understanding has always been that the Earth today is flooded with wanderers from Ra who are trying to work out the Earth-Ra karma bit by bit. RE: divinecosmos hacked again - 3DMonkey - 03-16-2011 (03-16-2011, 08:05 AM)unity100 Wrote: meaning, david wilcock cannot be channeling Ra in any interpretation. i doubt that, at the point of late 6d, any entity would leave their society complex, for david wilcock to be a breakaway entity which left its society complex, and therefore channeling his 'higher self'. also wanderers do not have higher selves. society complex, or, totality of the wanderer or the totality of the society complex, acts as higher self. In no way can I disagree with your assessment of David. All you points are true. On the topic of higher self: All of our higher selfs are 6D society complexes that act without separation. That is what the higher self is, you in the fullness of your 6D self. There are something like 53 6D complex higher selfs operating on Earth right now. RE: divinecosmos hacked again - yossarian - 03-16-2011 (03-16-2011, 08:07 AM)Ankh Wrote: 17.13 Questioner: When I am communicating with you as Ra, are you at times individualized as an entity or am I speaking to an entire social memory complex? This is who Don was speaking to. But consciousness is fungible and nothing is lost. Ra, at will, can split itself into individualized portions and send those portions to Earth as wanderers. This is my view anyway. Consciousness is fluid, like fire. It can change. Don was speaking to Ra the complex and no other Ra. This doesn't mean it is impossible to speak to a subdivision of the complex - it just means that Don was not speaking to a subdivision. Ra also used the question as an opportunity to emphasize the Law of One - namely that despite any apparent division unity still is truth. Quote:It is not stated somewhere that there are ANY Ra Wanderers incarnated on Earth. And if so, if it would that way, they are still subjects to 3D rules, and there is no difference between them or any other 6D Wanderer/or anyone else who can access the Higher Self, as Higher Self is a mid 6D Being. It is implied. Don never asks the question directly. Akhenaten at the very least is implied to be a wanderer from Ra. How is Ra going to work out their Earth karma if they avoid the #1 way they can serve the Earth -- by sending wanderers? RE: divinecosmos hacked again - Ocean - 03-16-2011 this is giving me a headache. ![]() i'm jk, it's a great discussion. i like the idea i could have been in egypt. or maybe not, what with all the mummies. RE: divinecosmos hacked again - Ankh - 03-16-2011 (03-16-2011, 08:21 AM)yossarian Wrote:Quote:It is not stated somewhere that there are ANY Ra Wanderers incarnated on Earth. And if so, if it would that way, they are still subjects to 3D rules, and there is no difference between them or any other 6D Wanderer/or anyone else who can access the Higher Self, as Higher Self is a mid 6D Being. I didn't interpret that imply then while reading about Echenaton. However I read a book by another Wanderer who remembered being a priest during that time, trying to help Echenaton, and he was not part of Ra. If this Earth is crowded by Ra why they took contact with L/L (not Ra Wanderers) instead of some of their own (in this case DW??) for making such heavy material as Law of One? Which is the base, the ground, of everything else that is been and still being said and done? What Earth karma are you implying that Ra need to work off? RE: divinecosmos hacked again - yossarian - 03-16-2011 http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?search_string=Akhenaten&search_type=all&ss=1&sc=1 In the Eighteenth Dynasty, as it is known in your records of space/time distortions, we were able to contact a pharaoh, as you would call him. The man was small in life-experience on your plane and was a… what this instrument would call, Wanderer. Thus, this mind/body/spirit complex received our communication distortions and was able to blend his distortions with our own. This young entity had been given a vibratory complex of sound which vibrated in honor of a prosperous god, as this mind/body complex, which we call instrument for convenience, would call “Ammon.” The entity decided that this name, being in honor of one among many gods, was not acceptable for inclusion in his vibratory sound complex. Thus, he changed his name to one which honored the sun disc. This distortion, called “Aten,” was a close distortion to our reality as we understand our own nature of mind/body/spirit complex distortion. However, it does not come totally into alignment with the intended teach/learning which was sent. This entity, Ikhnaton, became convinced that the vibration of One was the true spiritual vibration and thus decreed the Law of One. However, this entity’s beliefs were accepted by very few. His priests gave lip service only, without the spiritual distortion towards seeking. The peoples continued in their beliefs. When this entity was no longer in this density, again the polarized beliefs in the many gods came into their own and continued so until the one known as Muhammed delivered the peoples into a more intelligible distortion of mind/body/spirit relationships. Note that Ikhnaton is the alternative spelling for Akhenaten. How much do you want to bet that Akhenaten was a wanderer from the SMC of Ra? I think he wasn't the first nor the last. Being perfectly honest, I've actually just always assumed that almost everyone who posts here is a wanderer from Ra. To me this would explain why people vibrate so well with Ra. Since Ra was very involved in Earth karma, Ra would also make up the majority of wanderers on Earth, potentiating the existence of the high quality Ra contact. Obviously, you're going to resonate most strongly with the channeling from your own previous social memory complex. Maybe I'm deluding myself. But for a long time now it has seemed obvious to me that most if not everyone on this forum is from the social memory complex known as Ra. This forum has a very unique energy and I get very strong intuitive impressions from a lot of the people here... basically... that it's not the first time we've spoken by any means. Some of the people here are new arrivals to earth, and they often have the lightest auras, while others have been toiling for awhile and carry heavy battle scars. But most if not all come from the same place of deep commonality. I don't get this sense in plenty of other metaphysical forums. Just my opinion/perception/distortion/whatever. (03-16-2011, 09:13 AM)Ankh Wrote:(03-16-2011, 08:21 AM)yossarian Wrote:Quote:It is not stated somewhere that there are ANY Ra Wanderers incarnated on Earth. And if so, if it would that way, they are still subjects to 3D rules, and there is no difference between them or any other 6D Wanderer/or anyone else who can access the Higher Self, as Higher Self is a mid 6D Being. What makes you think LL are not from Ra? Being very candid, my interpretation of the Jim/Carla/Don triad has been that Jim and Carla are 6D from Ra and Don is 5D from someone else, perhaps Latwii. Would be very interested if there is something I haven't read on this issue. |