(02-20-2011, 01:58 PM)Eddie Wrote: Disclosure happened to me when I was a young child (and, similarly, for many others on this discussion board). We are arguing over something already proved.

Perhaps the bigger issue is why so many people want "the truth" to be authorized by the ruling elite, in order for it to be "true". The history of ruling elites should prompt us to realize that "truth" is generally an anathema to elites.

Izzy Wrote:What about all these professional private/military pilots and airtraffic controlers, military soliders that Greer has sworn statements from?

(02-20-2011, 12:36 AM)Derek ~ Wrote: Ok. Words are powerful, clarity is important my friend! To me when you say you think something is disinformation, it implies that it's intentional given the meaning and history of the word unless it's clarified.

Another topic that I wanted to bring up, is that we are often very quick to pick apart those out in the trenches doing all the work. For every new video or interview that comes out (from whoever), in the comments section you always see an overwhelming amount of negativity. It's the armchair quarterback syndrome.

I don't follow David Wilcock much anymore, but you see it a lot with him now. People loooove to talk about him and not about what he's presenting. We somehow seem to hold them to a higher standard than us, when in reality they are simply regular people putting in endless hours of work, experiencing and trying to deal with their own emotions in a public light.

I think what happens, and what you may see in Greer Crimson, is that this is his life's work and it has become personal for him. You find that when a researcher grows in popularity, people actually want to know more about them personally, so they start opening up. Just some positive thoughts to consider!

(02-20-2011, 05:54 PM)Derek ~ Wrote: Let me rephrase it this way: I don't think Greer is spreading disinformation for negative intent. More likely that not he probably fully understands the situation, but again, there are roles to be played.

Approaching the public and saying there is a good vs. bad ET situation being played out is completely false and misleading. Because there isn't a bad side, they are aspects of yourself used for catalysts. How do you explain this metaphysical reality to the average person stuck in their beliefs? And how do you do it without infringing on free will?

So what's the best approach? Is there even one? Explaining that there is no fear of invasion isn't exactly a lie, correct? Because we know it won't happen. This is Greer's position. He is always adamant against suggesting good vs. bad, because then it turns into an US vs. THEM possibility and we don't want to go down that road. This would actually serve a negative agenda of fear and separation. Rather, he advocates harmony by releasing technology and breaking down all the control mechanisms in place that keep us enslaved. But you don't want to totally let your guard down, because this allows for negative manipulation.

It's complicated, how do you do it? My answer is I don't know lol. I'm not even sure if there will ever be disclosure, rather, the discussion is for the purpose of fueling further seeking. There is somewhere in the Law of One that says the process involves finding evidence on another planet I think. Haven't read that part in a long time.

I imagine disclosure takes place more through transformation within. Of course there are negative agendas being played out, but I also see many of them collapsing.

The revelation of how enslaved and manipulated we really are is the heart of true disclosure.

Derek Wrote:Approaching the public and saying there is a good vs. bad ET situation being played out is misleading and doesn't come close to explaining the big picture.

Derek Wrote:Because there isn't a bad side, they are aspects of yourself used for catalysts.

Derek Wrote:How do you explain this metaphysical reality to the average person stuck in their beliefs? And how do you do it without infringing on free will?

Derek Wrote:So what's the best approach? Is there even one? Explaining that there is no fear of invasion isn't exactly a lie, correct?

Derek Wrote:The revelation of how enslaved and manipulated we really are is the heart of true disclosure.

(02-20-2011, 06:39 PM)Spectrum Wrote: Can you elaborate a little on this, because I don't think we understand the catalyst aspect the same.

Ens Entium Wrote:Does anyone know if his press conference was televised? Because.. again, what has come of their testimony? Does he have plans to share this publicly, widely?