+- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Bring4th Community (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=16)
+--- Forum: Olio (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: lawful neutral chaotic discussion (/showthread.php?tid=11381)
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Aion - 07-09-2015
Sounds like you lean towards a meritocracy.
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Bluebell - 07-09-2015
i'm PMSsing so hard!!!!!!!!!!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-09-2015
(07-09-2015, 04:28 PM)Farseer Wrote: Sounds like you lean towards a meritocracy.
It actually is a meritocracy based government. Good insight.
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Bluebell - 07-09-2015
well that was obvious
there's nothing wrong with ur views lighthead! let em out!
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-09-2015
(07-09-2015, 05:10 PM)Bluebell Wrote: well that was obvious
there's nothing wrong with ur views lighthead! let em out!
The reason I don't want to say it is because I'll be labeled as a racist. Which is the exact opposite of what I am. It's actually anti-racism. It's anti-tribalism. I basically believe in a system of dictatorship that is anti-tribalist and about promoting honor. I believe that we should work against groups, no matter what race they are, that are about promoting racism. There's actually one group in particular that has systematically proven to be tribalist and racist, over thousands of years. And that's the difficult part. That's where I might get into trouble.
If you're not satisified with that then I have to say, you are one persistent gal! Lol.
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Bluebell - 07-09-2015
(07-09-2015, 05:38 PM)Lighthead Wrote:(07-09-2015, 05:10 PM)Bluebell Wrote: well that was obvious
there's nothing wrong with ur views lighthead! let em out!
The reason I don't want to say it is because I'll be labeled as a racist. Which is the exact opposite of what I am. It's actually anti-racism. It's anti-tribalism. I basically believe in a system of dictatorship that is anti-tribalist and about promoting honor. I believe that we should work against groups, no matter what race they are, that are about promoting racism. There's actually one group in particular that has systematically proven to be tribalist and racist, over thousands of years. And that's the difficult part. That's where I might get into trouble.
If you're not satisified with that then I have to say, you are one persistent gal! Lol.
lol. i have a hunch about that group.
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Karl - 07-09-2015
(07-09-2015, 05:57 PM)Bluebell Wrote:He means the Jews.(07-09-2015, 05:38 PM)Lighthead Wrote:(07-09-2015, 05:10 PM)Bluebell Wrote: well that was obvious
there's nothing wrong with ur views lighthead! let em out!
The reason I don't want to say it is because I'll be labeled as a racist. Which is the exact opposite of what I am. It's actually anti-racism. It's anti-tribalism. I basically believe in a system of dictatorship that is anti-tribalist and about promoting honor. I believe that we should work against groups, no matter what race they are, that are about promoting racism. There's actually one group in particular that has systematically proven to be tribalist and racist, over thousands of years. And that's the difficult part. That's where I might get into trouble.
If you're not satisified with that then I have to say, you are one persistent gal! Lol.
lol. i have a hunch about that group.
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Reaper - 07-09-2015
Chaotic neutral.
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Bluebell - 07-09-2015
(07-09-2015, 08:38 PM)Karl Wrote:(07-09-2015, 05:57 PM)Bluebell Wrote:He means the Jews.(07-09-2015, 05:38 PM)Lighthead Wrote:(07-09-2015, 05:10 PM)Bluebell Wrote: well that was obvious
there's nothing wrong with ur views lighthead! let em out!
The reason I don't want to say it is because I'll be labeled as a racist. Which is the exact opposite of what I am. It's actually anti-racism. It's anti-tribalism. I basically believe in a system of dictatorship that is anti-tribalist and about promoting honor. I believe that we should work against groups, no matter what race they are, that are about promoting racism. There's actually one group in particular that has systematically proven to be tribalist and racist, over thousands of years. And that's the difficult part. That's where I might get into trouble.
If you're not satisified with that then I have to say, you are one persistent gal! Lol.
lol. i have a hunch about that group.
the state of israel is very racist indeed, or so i understand. how do u feel about it all Karl, my true neutral buddy?
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Bluebell - 07-09-2015
(07-09-2015, 09:13 PM)Yera Wrote: Chaotic neutral.
me too.
for some reason the test gave me true neutral.
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Karl - 07-09-2015
(07-09-2015, 09:13 PM)Bluebell Wrote: the state of israel is very racist indeed, or so i understand. how do u feel about it all Karl, my true neutral buddy?
I don't care
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Billy - 07-09-2015
I'm a racist, but I'm working on it.
https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-10-2015
Just for the record (like I told Bluebell), I think that I might be Jewish actually. You can be Jewish and be against their racist ways. Jesus chose to break free from the cycle. If you notice, even Ra says that there is more negative material in the Old Testament. I'm pretty sure that the negative materials in the New Testament are all the writings of Paul laying down his bullsh*t rules and regulations. Talk about stultifying a truly beautiful religion as Christianity.
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Minyatur - 07-10-2015
(07-09-2015, 09:52 PM)Folk-love Wrote: I'm a racist, but I'm working on it.
https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html
I'm apparently sexist :
Quote:Your Result
[font=arial, helvetica, sans-serif]Your data suggest a moderate association of Male with Career and Female with Family compared to Female with Career and Male with Family.[/font]
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Nía - 07-10-2015
(07-09-2015, 02:59 AM)Bluebell Wrote:(07-09-2015, 02:54 AM)Lighthead Wrote: I don't believe in democracy anymore. I believe in a socialist dictatorship. But not a Marxist dictatorship. I don't want to say too much because what I believe is very controversial.
benevolent dictatorship? please tell me more.
A little more off-topic (I didn't want to use/spoil the #4 thread), and unfortunately available only in German:
Brilliant German political cabaret artist Hagen Rether calling for an eco-dictatorship (which would be a very different concept from the one Lighthead might have in mind). Others seem to have called for some similar concept, too: Prominent American Scientists Call For Eco-Dictatorship Under UN Rule.
Might be a subject for another (political/sociological) kind of forum, though.
-`ღ´-
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-10-2015
(07-10-2015, 03:43 AM)facettes Wrote:(07-09-2015, 02:59 AM)Bluebell Wrote:(07-09-2015, 02:54 AM)Lighthead Wrote: I don't believe in democracy anymore. I believe in a socialist dictatorship. But not a Marxist dictatorship. I don't want to say too much because what I believe is very controversial.
benevolent dictatorship? please tell me more.
A little more off-topic (I didn't want to use/spoil the #4 thread), and unfortunately available only in German:
Brilliant German political cabaret artist Hagen Rether calling for an eco-dictatorship (which would be a very different concept from the one Lighthead might have in mind). Others seem to have called for some similar concept, too: Prominent American Scientists Call For Eco-Dictatorship Under UN Rule.
Might be a subject for another (political/sociological) kind of forum, though.
-`ღ´-
It's actually not different at all. I completely believe in an Eco-dictatorship. But that's just one component for me.
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Nía - 07-10-2015
(07-10-2015, 03:56 AM)Lighthead Wrote: It's actually not different at all. I completely believe in an Eco-dictatorship. But that's just one component for me.
Sorry for misinterpreting your words - the term 'socialist dictatorship' didn't naturally include that for me.
-`ღ´-
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-10-2015
(07-10-2015, 04:12 AM)facettes Wrote:(07-10-2015, 03:56 AM)Lighthead Wrote: It's actually not different at all. I completely believe in an Eco-dictatorship. But that's just one component for me.
Sorry for misinterpreting your words - the term 'socialist dictatorship' didn't naturally include that for me.
-`ღ´-
No worries. The key is no elections. The masses are not qualified to know who is best for the job. The dictator should work their way up to that position.
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Nía - 07-10-2015
(07-10-2015, 04:27 AM)Lighthead Wrote: The masses are not qualified to know who is best for the job.
Then who knows? Is 'the masses' a given/fixed/constant set?
(07-10-2015, 04:27 AM)Lighthead Wrote: The dictator should work their way up to that position.
Where would he/she/it/they start?
-`ღ´-
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Bluebell - 07-10-2015
masses on our planet are extremely poisoned and brainwashed, and so one wise individual should lead them. for their own good. it's not controlling but shepherding. caring for the lost little sheep.
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-10-2015
(07-10-2015, 04:34 AM)facettes Wrote:(07-10-2015, 04:27 AM)Lighthead Wrote: The masses are not qualified to know who is best for the job.
Then who knows? Is 'the masses' a given/fixed/constant set?
(07-10-2015, 04:27 AM)Lighthead Wrote: The dictator should work their way up to that position.
Where would he/she/it/they start?
-`ღ´-
I'll try to answer this tomorrow when I get on my laptop. My stupid tablet is not working right again.
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Nía - 07-10-2015
(07-10-2015, 04:40 AM)Lighthead Wrote: I'll try to answer this tomorrow when I get on my laptop.
Thank you!
(07-10-2015, 04:40 AM)Lighthead Wrote: My stupid tablet is not working right again.
-`ღ´-
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-10-2015
(07-10-2015, 04:34 AM)facettes Wrote:(07-10-2015, 04:27 AM)Lighthead Wrote: The masses are not qualified to know who is best for the job.
Then who knows? Is 'the masses' a given/fixed/constant set?
The one who would know is whoever is involved in the promoting process. It's the same as would happen in any job. Whoever is best for the job is the one for the job. For example, let's say that the party leader is, in some way, deemed ineffective. Then that person would step down, and the more qualified person would take his/her place. If the person doesn't step down then the person would be removed by force.
I didn't understand your second question. If you could explain. If I understand your question, the masses are simply the people who elect a politician without having all of the information. And politicians pretty much always start out not really knowing what they're doing. But the main thing is that it's all just a popularity contest. The leader should have a remarkable personality (so that the nation takes on the personality of the leader), but the decisive factor is how well the person leads. If that person is not qualified, then that person is out of there on the next day.
(07-10-2015, 04:34 AM)facettes Wrote:(07-10-2015, 04:27 AM)Lighthead Wrote: The dictator should work their way up to that position.
Where would he/she/it/they start?
-`ღ´-
It doesn't really matter where the person starts. It all depends on how worthy the person is for the job. Ideally, the person should start out at the very bottom so as to gain the most experience. But it's not really possible for everyone to start at the bottom. Those in a leadership position since the beginning wouldn't start out at the bottom. But, either way, if that person is not right for the job (like I said before) then they would be replaced. It would be best if the leaders could be sorted into the adequate position before the party takes a hold of the country. But the party should ideally work into a position of leadership in the respective nation the way any party (communist, green, etc.) starts out. It should all be legal in the first place. And then when that party is elected into power, that's when the party takes the opportunity available and takes hold. I don't believe in a forcible revolution.
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-10-2015
(07-10-2015, 04:43 AM)facettes Wrote:(07-10-2015, 04:40 AM)Lighthead Wrote: My stupid tablet is not working right again.
-`ღ´-
My tablet doesn't allow me to arrange the quotes with the source code. That's the way I prefer to do it. It's an old, practically junk iPad. Somebody gave it to me. It's better than nothing, I guess.
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Karl - 07-11-2015
I would have a heyday restructuring government systems.
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Bluebell - 07-11-2015
me too. although i would delegate paperwork.
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Karl - 07-11-2015
Proper delegation is a hallmark of effective leadership.
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Lighthead - 07-11-2015
(07-11-2015, 12:22 PM)Karl Wrote: Proper delegation is a hallmark of effective leadership.
That actually is true.
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - ree - 07-11-2015
If I were your mother and you didn't take out the garbage I'll say no internet for 1 day. Then, I'd find a job you would actually enjoy and be good at doing around the house haha.
RE: lawful neutral chaotic discussion - Minyatur - 07-11-2015
(07-11-2015, 01:52 PM)metieta Wrote: If I were your mother and you didn't take out the garbage I'll say no internet for 1 day. Then, I'd find a job you would actually enjoy and be good at doing around the house haha.
Wow no internet for a day, talk about being harsh.
