Ra says that the -6D entity "being extremely wise, perceives it's own spiritual entropy"

I think this is them starting to realize that their entire super-solipsistic schtick is based on disownership of the self. And it seems everything they aspire to become is everything negative they project onto other-selves. And in their wisdom, I think they start to realize that, and the idea of disowning the other-self for doing what you are doing is essentially losing more and more of your self, which is I guess perceived as "spiritual entropy" then. I dunno, maybe I'm wrong. Just an idea.

Hi, new here and just trying to get my head round this fascinating material.

So I have a question around a Ra answer (book 1 session 16):

Questioner: I am assuming that it is not necessary for an individual to understand the Law of One to go from the third to the fourth density. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. It is absolutely necessary that an entity consciously realize it does not understand in order for it to be harvestable.

Understanding is not of this density.

So above there is a bit of misunderstanding on Ra's part on what the questioner is asking. However Ra's answer is nonetheless very interesting. He seems to be saying that is very important that we consciously know that we do not understand the Law of One in order to be harvested. However the whole content of the Ra material seems to be around the questioner trying to understand the Law of One. As 3D beings we can never fully know it because it is known only through direct experience but as we are attempting to understand it then our minds will form some conclusion as to the extent to which it does understand it. I know I don't understand it because it is beyond my capacity to but in as far as I understand the Ra material then to an extent I do understand it. Help

When I look at Jesus life and the lives of other good people during their time they were treated very badly.
I think this is the nature of this world. Resources have to be taken instead of being asked. The beast wins. The strong survive and the weak die. At least until earth becomes uninhabitable for 3D humans.
How do you cope with this? How do you manage not to lose yourself in anger for those who are too ignorant and blind to the truth.

Hey everyone,  if a person was neutral polarity  and then they suddenly discovered the Ra material and realized that it was harvest time soon, so they changed their actions to become more STO, with the intention of evolving to 4th, and not having to come back to 3d reality, then does that make their actions STS,

It makes more sense to me when I frame service to self as being aware of primarily the body energetic field. Extending one's awareness into the world AND including the body is the highest form of service to the creator because the creator is fed by what we are aware of. Thus, feeding the world to the creator is the greatest service. This also works for when one is listening to others. We have ones that are mostly just aware of their own bodies, ones that allow their focus to rest on the body field of another. Then there is the ones that are neither focused wholly on themselves or another.

Thoughts?

Hello everyone,

Do you have a graphic depiction or 'diagram' of the rays and what energies they represent?

I've considered just image-searching the web for 'chakra diagram' but I don't necessarily trust the accuracy and thought I'd ask this group to see if anyone has created something along the lines of what I'm looking for.

Also, if there's a portion of the book(s) where I should read that can concisely explain the rays and their interaction, please feel free to share that also! I'm not new to the material, but certainly don't know it as well as most (yet!). I've listened to Scott Mandelker's talks on the topic-- and am planning to re-listen to them again after this post-- but wanted to inquire here in hopes that I could avoid having to sift through all my bookmarked interviews, pdfs, (etc etc).

(ps: I don't post much on bring4th, but I do drop in and browse quite often. Every time I do, I learn so much-- thank you all for being such a wonderful resource!)

(pps: https://www.llresearch.org/homecomings/h..._2006.aspx would be a good place to start reading as well?)

Ra said the form of 4D is a continuous process of physical evolution from second-density.

Quote:The cause for a variety of so-called physical vehicles is the remaining variety of heritages from second-density physical vehicular forms. The process of what you call physical evolution continues to hold sway into fourth density. Only when the ways of wisdom have begun to refine the power of what you may loosely call thought is the form of the physical complex manifestation more nearly under the direction of the consciousness.

I'm a little confused.

So, in order to become harvestable you need at least 51%+/50%- STO/STS.

I'm confused about the percentages. Percent of what? Total action? Like all your actions combined? To me it sounds like there's no room at all for neutral action, i.e actions that don't contribute to STO or STS. That's confusing to me, because obviously there are neutral actions that we perform every day (washing the dishes, filling up cars with gas, etc.)

Does what I'm saying make sense? I can elaborate more if need be. I'm having trouble even asking the question lol.

Thanks all

Is it possible to smoke marijuana and polarize positively?

I hold this notion that in order to truly polarize positively, you have to relinquish that sort of thing. I've had my own issues with addiction in this life, which has given way to some shame, so I don't know if this is distorted or not. The other part of me tells me that it'd violate free will if we couldn't partake in that sort of thing.

Obviously if you are smoking/ingesting cannabis 24/7, there is going to be some obvious blowback. If you're smoking before bed though, I don't really see the harm in it. Although I do acknowledge that people don't typically get high for others, they tend to get high for themselves. I can't even think of a scenario in which someone would get high for another person. So, to me, it's clear that this sort of thing is a STS oriented action.

So, in my mind, if someone wanted to polarize positively say 95%+/5%-, then yeah, they might want to consider kicking the substances. However, if someone isn't aiming for that degree of positive polarity, I don't really see the harm. As long as they are still serving others more than they are serving themselves.

Whenever I think about this, it's like a mess in my mind. I'd like to hear what you guys think about this particular topic.

Hey all,

I want to get a discussion going about Kundalini and the concept of serving others/self, and any other Law of One topics you guys might think of.

I had a spontaneous kundalini awakening 2 years ago when I was 19 years old. It was quite jarring at first and it took me quite a while to adjust. I'm much more balanced nowadays than I was then.

I've spent a good amount of time in the r/kundalini subreddit on reddit. It's a good subreddit. The primary moderator, Marc, is a kind and helpful fellow. I can't find the post right now, but at some point someone asked a question about what K actually is. Marc's response was extensive, however one part that stuck out to me was he said something that suggested those who had a K awakening were (I'm going to butcher this) "on their way out, but holding the door open for others before they go through themselves..." something like that. That's what I got from it at least.

I've been getting back into the Ra material lately and this suggestion that those who had a K awakening wished (deep down....) to serve others, obviously coincides with the STO concept in the Ra material.

I've read the section of session 49 about Kundalini, but it doesn't really go toooooo in depth.

So, is this the case? Kundalini awakenings happen to those who wish to serve others? So a person who is majority STS cannot have a K awakening?

If that's the case, why? I mean, K is a great help when used appropriately and respectfully. But why wouldn't someone who serves themselves be able to awaken their K? I understand that an individual with a majority STS who has an activated K is potentially dangerous. However, in my mind, everyone should have a fair shot at it right? Do STS people have their own, negative, version of K?

I'd really love to hear everyone's views on this. Thanks all!