09-26-2014, 10:08 PM
No, because Jimmy may then take that torture and brutality and simply take it out on someone else or somewhere else. The brutality of that individual would not be abated by the choice of the buyer, and so abuse would continue just in a different form.
Now, would Johnny not be using his choice to potentially alter the conditions of the animals which he could possibly do by attempting to show Jimmy a better way? True, but that is indifference, not self-serving. Self-serving would be asking to join in on the torture. Service would be the attempt to heal Jimmy of his violent and torturous tendencies.
Now, would Johnny not be using his choice to potentially alter the conditions of the animals which he could possibly do by attempting to show Jimmy a better way? True, but that is indifference, not self-serving. Self-serving would be asking to join in on the torture. Service would be the attempt to heal Jimmy of his violent and torturous tendencies.