07-22-2011, 03:48 PM
(07-21-2011, 09:16 AM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: WHAT?! Could this possibly mean that Ra is not infallible? Or perhaps that limitations in the Questioner's mind could distort the communication toward greater confusion? Wild!
lets get to the bottom of this - you have a beef with some information in the material, and you need Ra to be fallible in order for that information not to disturb you. this is the picture youre drawing with your concern going on and on in all threads, taking the form of 'ra's fallibleness'.
why not cut to the chase and just pop the real deal ?