03-21-2009, 05:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-21-2009, 05:59 PM by MisterRabbit.)
In today's saturday chat, I mentioned to Carla about Q'uo's response to the first question in the most recent Light/Lines newsletter. Discussion of this topic led me to think it worthy of threaditude.
Here is a link to the transcript. It's the first question, so no effort finding it:
http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&attid=0...tion%2Fpdf
The most essential passages to me are...
You see, I am basically a passive-reductive seeker, pretty Toaist-Buddhisty, while I feel that the general vibe of this webpage is active-inclusive, since the confederation sources primarily lean in that direction.
At the same time, I feel a strong resonance with everyone here and was drawn myself to the confederation sources, primarily by those of Ra. This may be due to Ra’s being a 6D type message, where such dualities as this one are no more.
Regardless, I feel that we all must work to balance whatever our current disposition is by the opposite. For instance my rather yin passive-reductive emphasis gives me the advantages of that path, but I feel myself being drawn to the other side of the spectrum. Likewise, some here who are probably more active-inclusively oriented have expressed that they feel a need to do a greater degree of “inner work”, which I take to probably mean getting more into the passive-reductive side.
I also feel that it is more than just the difference between Being and Doing, But that it is an essential difference in approach to evolution. While the passive-reductive path goes towards zero, the active-inclusive goes towards infinity, but oddly enough, they both end up at the same place, because it turns out that zero is infinity.
Or, as I like to put it, 0 = ∞ = 1
And, oddly enough, 1 > 2
So, I’d like to hear what everyone’s experience and opinion of this interesting subject is.
Here is a link to the transcript. It's the first question, so no effort finding it:
http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&attid=0...tion%2Fpdf
The most essential passages to me are...
Quote:We wish to thank the one known as G for this
query. It enables us to look at the two paths of
seeking which may be called “passive and reductive”
and “active and inclusive.” The passive and reductive
path is that which we would characterize as the
Buddhist way, the Way of the Yogis. The beginning
of the path is seen as one of chaos and a world of
confusion and suffering. The end of the path is seen
as the end of suffering and the reduction of all chaos
into the “zero” of the uncluttered and empty mind.
In contrast, the way of activity and inclusiveness
might be characterized as that Western way, which is
understood by this instrument as the Christian way,
where there is a journey from the beginning which is
a similar landscape to the beginning of the Buddhist
way, full of chaos and suffering. However, the end of
this way is seen as a journey into more and more
fullness of content, more and more connection to
the world, until the world becomes holy or sacred.
In its way of describing that which is the spiritual
journey, the Confederation, as you call our group,
leans more towards the inclusive path than the
reductive path. And yet both are views of the same
process and the same underlying reality, if we may
use that term in such a world of illusion as is the
Creation.
...This description would indicate that in our opinion
there is no difference between one who believes that
he is channeling pure radiance of being and one who believes that he is entering a state of non-separation
and the complete unity of all things.
You see, I am basically a passive-reductive seeker, pretty Toaist-Buddhisty, while I feel that the general vibe of this webpage is active-inclusive, since the confederation sources primarily lean in that direction.
At the same time, I feel a strong resonance with everyone here and was drawn myself to the confederation sources, primarily by those of Ra. This may be due to Ra’s being a 6D type message, where such dualities as this one are no more.
Regardless, I feel that we all must work to balance whatever our current disposition is by the opposite. For instance my rather yin passive-reductive emphasis gives me the advantages of that path, but I feel myself being drawn to the other side of the spectrum. Likewise, some here who are probably more active-inclusively oriented have expressed that they feel a need to do a greater degree of “inner work”, which I take to probably mean getting more into the passive-reductive side.
I also feel that it is more than just the difference between Being and Doing, But that it is an essential difference in approach to evolution. While the passive-reductive path goes towards zero, the active-inclusive goes towards infinity, but oddly enough, they both end up at the same place, because it turns out that zero is infinity.
Or, as I like to put it, 0 = ∞ = 1
And, oddly enough, 1 > 2
So, I’d like to hear what everyone’s experience and opinion of this interesting subject is.