02-07-2022, 02:23 PM
Since planet earth is said to be on it's way of evolving from 3rd towards 4th density.
I've been wondering on how "4th density planet" will look like.
And for that maybe taking a look on Venus as case study might be worthwhile.
There has been few indicators that Venus once harbored carbon based lifeform similar to earth.
Even today, there's still some sign that it is.
Researchers Discover First Signs of Life in the Clouds of Venus! Phosphorus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a15Dks6qP5o
And here some scientist tried to hypothesize on what happened to Venus few billion years ago.
Venus Death of a Planet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTGxCxNVn9g
Moving 'slightly beyond physical observation', remote viewing Venus.
Venus Before It Died
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxDcviVHOVQ
Some similarities that they able to get from 'remote viewing'; Cities, population and quake in Venus.
While from Ra, we got:
Thus the main question that I have now is:
Does 'moving beyond 3rd density and towards 4th density' means 'death of carbon based life form' on earth?
Maybe some other members on this forum is capable to shed more light on this.
I've been wondering on how "4th density planet" will look like.
And for that maybe taking a look on Venus as case study might be worthwhile.
There has been few indicators that Venus once harbored carbon based lifeform similar to earth.
Even today, there's still some sign that it is.
Researchers Discover First Signs of Life in the Clouds of Venus! Phosphorus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a15Dks6qP5o
And here some scientist tried to hypothesize on what happened to Venus few billion years ago.
Venus Death of a Planet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTGxCxNVn9g
Moving 'slightly beyond physical observation', remote viewing Venus.
Venus Before It Died
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxDcviVHOVQ
Some similarities that they able to get from 'remote viewing'; Cities, population and quake in Venus.
While from Ra, we got:
Quote:Questioner: How many of our years ago was Ra’s third density ended?
Ra: I am Ra. The calculations necessary for establishing this point are difficult since so much of what you call time is taken up before and after third density as you see the progress of time from your vantage point. We may say in general that the time of our enjoyment of the choice-making was approximately 2.6 million of your sun-years in your past. However— we correct this instrument. Your term is billion, 2.6 billion of your years in your past. However, this time, as you call it, is not meaningful for our intervening space/time has been experienced in a manner quite unlike your third-density experience of space/time.
Questioner: It appears that the end of Ra’s third density coincided with the beginning of this planet’s second density. Is that correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is roughly correct.
Questioner: Did the planet Venus become a fourth-density planet at that time?
Ra: I am Ra. This is so.
Questioner: Did it later, then, become a fifth-density planet?
Ra: I am Ra. It later became a fourth/fifth-density planet; then, later a fifth-density planet for a large measure of your time. Both fourth and fifth-density experiences were possible upon the planetary influence of what you call Venus.
Questioner: What is its density at present?
Ra: I am Ra. Its core vibrational frequency is sixth density.
However we, as a social memory complex have elected to leave that influence.
Therefore, the beings inhabiting this planetary influence at this space/time are fifth-density entities.
The planet may be considered a fifth/sixth-density planet.
Thus the main question that I have now is:
Does 'moving beyond 3rd density and towards 4th density' means 'death of carbon based life form' on earth?
Maybe some other members on this forum is capable to shed more light on this.