11-19-2021, 02:07 PM
The Law of One in ancient Egypt : (1) Heliopolis, the temple of One
The oldest and most respected of the egyptian temples, the one that initiated the organic law and the genesis of the egyptian myth, was the temple named by the Greeks Heliopolis (the City of the Sun), which was as large as a modern (little) city. The sun then being represented by Ra (or Rê), Heliopolis was a temple dedicated to the solar cult of Ra (as smc) and as such likely to express his word and his message !
But long before the Greeks, the Egyptians named this temple jwnw, phonetically translated and firstly writed as iounou, ioun or onou, as you can see here.
The ancient city (the temple) of iounou was located in the Nile delta, and was the capital of the thirteenth nome of Lower Egypt. This capital has today become a simple suburb of northeast Cairo called Aîn-ech-Chams or Ayn Shams (the Eye of the Sun).
Those who wish will could see, on Google Earth, what remains today - a simple wasteland - of the central part of Heliopolis with the following coordinates: 30°07'44"N - 31°18'20"E. Heliopolis was indeed completely dismantled by the Lagid Greeks (Ptolemaics) to build Alexandria, and in particular its great lighthouse, which was supposed to illuminate the civilized world (thank you Aristotle!).
The Jews, for their part, originally named this temple ounes, of which it is said that Moses and the Levites were, if not priors of this temple, at least their heirs. Freud made in 1934 a remarkable study on this subject, in relation to the origins of monotheism. Study whose first version was recently published in French under the title: L'Homme Moïse, un roman historique (the original, handwritten in German, is in the Library of Congress in Washington, but I couldn't find its English translation).
We find later this same ounes in the original Hebrew bible under the name of 'own, with in particular the master of "Joseph", Potiphar (or Poti-Phera), who was a priest of 'own. Which leads us to suppose that Joseph, who married Asenath, the daughter of Potiphar, became himself priest of 'own (Heliopolis). But it is another story, of which I will perhaps speak in another article.
And this 'own is translated as "one" in the English version of the Hebrew bible (Potiphar is effectively named priest of one in the English version of the Hebrew bible), and as "on" in its French version.
So ! With jwnw, then iounou, ioun or onou, just like ounes, and then 'own, himself translated in English as one and into French as on, we finally discover that:
Heliopolis was the temple of One, where the Law of One, the word of the social memory complex named Ra, was expressed!
There is here a very subtle assimilation between Ra and One, where One designates both a deity, a temple and a (his) law, as a rule and a collective word.
Seen in this context, One is no longer equal to the number "one" (1), or to the unit, this as we see in the "title" of the french version of The Law of One, falsely translated as "La loi Une" while it should be translated into french as "La loi d'On".
One become here a "subject pronoun", in the form of a "we", but which expresses itself as a very formal unit. When Ra was speaking in the temple grounds then, it is easy to imagine that his word were transcribed as follows : "One say that ..." (in French : On dit que ...). One is thus a subject pronoun which specifically designates the expression of Ra as social memory complex (a collective, even unified).
We understand very well that later, One also designated in English the value "one" (1), but secondly only! The best proof is that in French, one (1) is designated by "un", and not by "on" (the french version of the subject pronoun one). This when in Egypt, one (1) was designated by wˁ (ou).
All that becomes the explanation of a grammatical difficulties clearly pointed out by Ra in session 83.28:
Questioner: I noticed you started this session with “I communicate now.” You usually use “We communicate now.” Is there any significance or difference with respect to that?
Ra: “I am Ra.” “We am Ra.” You may see the grammatical difficulties of your linguistic structure in dealing with a social memory complex. There is no distinction between the first person singular and plural in your language when pertaining to Ra.
But now this distinction seems to be made ! And Ra, as smc, could have said at that time "One communicate now" and notably : "One is Ra" instead of "I am Ra".
To summarize, we can say that ancient Egypt was founded, and developed, from a primitive law enacted in Héliopolis, the temple of One, dedicated to Ra, which allows us to name this ancient law: The Law of One (and La loi d'On in French).
It is this law, with the teaching that was deduced from it, that guided all the genesis of the development and the social polarization of ancient Egypt until about -1650, when the Hyksos invaded the North of the country (lower Egypt ).
Hyksos which in fact divided Egypt, its territory and its teaching, both unified through the myth of Isis and Osiris, into two totally separate and irreconcilable parts. What will lead to the death of the living myth of ancient Egypt, to its territorial "depolarization" and to its slow degeneration.
That explain us more precisely how the Law of One disappeared from Egypt and from the face of the earth.
But this is still this other story of which we will perhaps discuss in a future article.
The oldest and most respected of the egyptian temples, the one that initiated the organic law and the genesis of the egyptian myth, was the temple named by the Greeks Heliopolis (the City of the Sun), which was as large as a modern (little) city. The sun then being represented by Ra (or Rê), Heliopolis was a temple dedicated to the solar cult of Ra (as smc) and as such likely to express his word and his message !
But long before the Greeks, the Egyptians named this temple jwnw, phonetically translated and firstly writed as iounou, ioun or onou, as you can see here.
The ancient city (the temple) of iounou was located in the Nile delta, and was the capital of the thirteenth nome of Lower Egypt. This capital has today become a simple suburb of northeast Cairo called Aîn-ech-Chams or Ayn Shams (the Eye of the Sun).
Those who wish will could see, on Google Earth, what remains today - a simple wasteland - of the central part of Heliopolis with the following coordinates: 30°07'44"N - 31°18'20"E. Heliopolis was indeed completely dismantled by the Lagid Greeks (Ptolemaics) to build Alexandria, and in particular its great lighthouse, which was supposed to illuminate the civilized world (thank you Aristotle!).
The Jews, for their part, originally named this temple ounes, of which it is said that Moses and the Levites were, if not priors of this temple, at least their heirs. Freud made in 1934 a remarkable study on this subject, in relation to the origins of monotheism. Study whose first version was recently published in French under the title: L'Homme Moïse, un roman historique (the original, handwritten in German, is in the Library of Congress in Washington, but I couldn't find its English translation).
We find later this same ounes in the original Hebrew bible under the name of 'own, with in particular the master of "Joseph", Potiphar (or Poti-Phera), who was a priest of 'own. Which leads us to suppose that Joseph, who married Asenath, the daughter of Potiphar, became himself priest of 'own (Heliopolis). But it is another story, of which I will perhaps speak in another article.
And this 'own is translated as "one" in the English version of the Hebrew bible (Potiphar is effectively named priest of one in the English version of the Hebrew bible), and as "on" in its French version.
So ! With jwnw, then iounou, ioun or onou, just like ounes, and then 'own, himself translated in English as one and into French as on, we finally discover that:
Heliopolis was the temple of One, where the Law of One, the word of the social memory complex named Ra, was expressed!
There is here a very subtle assimilation between Ra and One, where One designates both a deity, a temple and a (his) law, as a rule and a collective word.
Seen in this context, One is no longer equal to the number "one" (1), or to the unit, this as we see in the "title" of the french version of The Law of One, falsely translated as "La loi Une" while it should be translated into french as "La loi d'On".
One become here a "subject pronoun", in the form of a "we", but which expresses itself as a very formal unit. When Ra was speaking in the temple grounds then, it is easy to imagine that his word were transcribed as follows : "One say that ..." (in French : On dit que ...). One is thus a subject pronoun which specifically designates the expression of Ra as social memory complex (a collective, even unified).
We understand very well that later, One also designated in English the value "one" (1), but secondly only! The best proof is that in French, one (1) is designated by "un", and not by "on" (the french version of the subject pronoun one). This when in Egypt, one (1) was designated by wˁ (ou).
All that becomes the explanation of a grammatical difficulties clearly pointed out by Ra in session 83.28:
Questioner: I noticed you started this session with “I communicate now.” You usually use “We communicate now.” Is there any significance or difference with respect to that?
Ra: “I am Ra.” “We am Ra.” You may see the grammatical difficulties of your linguistic structure in dealing with a social memory complex. There is no distinction between the first person singular and plural in your language when pertaining to Ra.
But now this distinction seems to be made ! And Ra, as smc, could have said at that time "One communicate now" and notably : "One is Ra" instead of "I am Ra".
To summarize, we can say that ancient Egypt was founded, and developed, from a primitive law enacted in Héliopolis, the temple of One, dedicated to Ra, which allows us to name this ancient law: The Law of One (and La loi d'On in French).
It is this law, with the teaching that was deduced from it, that guided all the genesis of the development and the social polarization of ancient Egypt until about -1650, when the Hyksos invaded the North of the country (lower Egypt ).
Hyksos which in fact divided Egypt, its territory and its teaching, both unified through the myth of Isis and Osiris, into two totally separate and irreconcilable parts. What will lead to the death of the living myth of ancient Egypt, to its territorial "depolarization" and to its slow degeneration.
That explain us more precisely how the Law of One disappeared from Egypt and from the face of the earth.
But this is still this other story of which we will perhaps discuss in a future article.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)
