NB: Aware that posting things 'as is' without personal analysis/commentary is a guideline breach - (and not useful); any discussion of this article will need to cross reference newer findings, analysis since last October.
I'm working towards that (in a word doc) whenever I get a chance.
Initial takeaway: there's a LOT of scientific knowledge needed for a person to have an opinion on the science of epidemiology and pandemics in relation to Coronavirus biology and replication, and the complexity and detail in this article indicates this most clearly.
Not even a basic science degree would be sufficient to make broad public statements about these incredibly thorough investigations without joining this specific research team (Switzerland), or at least speaking with them in person - let alone adopting simplistic 'opinions' garnered from non expert sources.
I'm working towards that (in a word doc) whenever I get a chance.
Initial takeaway: there's a LOT of scientific knowledge needed for a person to have an opinion on the science of epidemiology and pandemics in relation to Coronavirus biology and replication, and the complexity and detail in this article indicates this most clearly.
Not even a basic science degree would be sufficient to make broad public statements about these incredibly thorough investigations without joining this specific research team (Switzerland), or at least speaking with them in person - let alone adopting simplistic 'opinions' garnered from non expert sources.