06-11-2017, 08:40 PM
Hello friends,
I am happy to be on this forum. I have been looking at your posts and appreciating what I am reading.
For seven years I have been seeking to learn more of the Law of One. I attempt to offer what I have learned to this group, in the form of a fairly large and expanding body of writing in the style of scholarly research. I hope this is an appropriate use of this forum, to advertise such teach/learning instruments concerning the Law of One.
I wish to share my story briefly, to contextualize the writings I'm offering.
The Ra material raises many philosophical puzzles that my doubts led me to be interested in. How can it be that all is one, considering this may lead to the logically contradictory conclusion that every statement is true? How can one rationally believe in the Law of One, without the kind of verification normally expected from science? My desire to have some good answers to these questions led me to the University of Connecticut philosophy program. I spent a couple years there, and with the help of the One Infinite Creator, I learned a lot about logic, published some research on the mathematics of paradoxes, and left to greener pastures developing software in Colorado.
I feel I have made some good progress towards the goal I set of reconciling the Law of One with logic and rationality. I have done it in a technically thorough way, all the details of which are available at my website neosocratic.net. I have begun the work of describing my findings from a variety of different perspectives. In short, what I claim to have is a system of meta-philosophy which reconciles the Law of One with logic and reason, and shows how logic and reason can be more securely founded on the Law of One than they can without (as far as I can tell).
This work mainly breaks down into two texts, both works in progress.
One text, Winning Arguments, is a system of meta-philosophy built out of the Law of One and in the precise, rigorous tradition of analytic philosophy. It shows ways to solve various logical paradoxes, including ones related to the Law of One. This text is incomplete, but the parts that are there are pretty well developed, and they lay out my system for dealing with paradoxes and how it relates to the Law of One.
The other text, Magic, is an attempt to summarize some important points of the Ra material, extrapolated with my personal understandings, in the format of a system of magic. This text is much less far along.
Since both texts are still in progress, and I am a fallible human, if you should happen to look at either one, any input you may have is appreciated and has the potential to help significantly. Reading all of this work would be no small task, and I can only speculate as to whether any of you reading this would benefit from reading my work. I am indeed curious what will result from this post, as I have no idea what to expect.
With love and light!
Morgan
I am happy to be on this forum. I have been looking at your posts and appreciating what I am reading.
For seven years I have been seeking to learn more of the Law of One. I attempt to offer what I have learned to this group, in the form of a fairly large and expanding body of writing in the style of scholarly research. I hope this is an appropriate use of this forum, to advertise such teach/learning instruments concerning the Law of One.
I wish to share my story briefly, to contextualize the writings I'm offering.
The Ra material raises many philosophical puzzles that my doubts led me to be interested in. How can it be that all is one, considering this may lead to the logically contradictory conclusion that every statement is true? How can one rationally believe in the Law of One, without the kind of verification normally expected from science? My desire to have some good answers to these questions led me to the University of Connecticut philosophy program. I spent a couple years there, and with the help of the One Infinite Creator, I learned a lot about logic, published some research on the mathematics of paradoxes, and left to greener pastures developing software in Colorado.
I feel I have made some good progress towards the goal I set of reconciling the Law of One with logic and rationality. I have done it in a technically thorough way, all the details of which are available at my website neosocratic.net. I have begun the work of describing my findings from a variety of different perspectives. In short, what I claim to have is a system of meta-philosophy which reconciles the Law of One with logic and reason, and shows how logic and reason can be more securely founded on the Law of One than they can without (as far as I can tell).
This work mainly breaks down into two texts, both works in progress.
One text, Winning Arguments, is a system of meta-philosophy built out of the Law of One and in the precise, rigorous tradition of analytic philosophy. It shows ways to solve various logical paradoxes, including ones related to the Law of One. This text is incomplete, but the parts that are there are pretty well developed, and they lay out my system for dealing with paradoxes and how it relates to the Law of One.
The other text, Magic, is an attempt to summarize some important points of the Ra material, extrapolated with my personal understandings, in the format of a system of magic. This text is much less far along.
Since both texts are still in progress, and I am a fallible human, if you should happen to look at either one, any input you may have is appreciated and has the potential to help significantly. Reading all of this work would be no small task, and I can only speculate as to whether any of you reading this would benefit from reading my work. I am indeed curious what will result from this post, as I have no idea what to expect.
With love and light!
Morgan