Polarity and the cult of personality.

[Matt1]

One of the most interesting things i have found in the Law of One is the historical examples that Ra gives as people who have polarized negatively or positively and are fairly far along that given path. What do you think the crystallization of polarity really is for an individual? I could give an example of an negative entity such as Himmler that Ra mentions below,

35.5 Questioner: Thank you. An important example, I believe. I was wondering if any of those who were subordinate to Adolf at that time were able to polarize in a harvestable nature on the negative path?

Ra: I am Ra. We can speak only of two entities who may be harvestable in a negative sense, others still being in the physical incarnation: one known to you as Hermann; the other known, as it preferred to be called, Himmler.

To put this into perspective Himmler killed 11 million to 14 million people according to Wikipedia such a level of polarity would logically be insane you would assume.

Now if we take an example of someone on the positive path such as Augustine of Hippo who according to Wikipedia basically revived Christianity after the fall of Rome during his era. Again an extraordinary level of polarity surely.

Is polarity truly such as Rare thing? That it comes only in the few who are saintly or pure evil? or are these more exterm examples that Ra has given due to the well know nature of the above mentioned?

[Minyatur]

Or maybe they mentioned the names of those who did big enough things that they are worth mentioning (strong examples) or so that we know the names altogether.

I think balance is what matters most to harvest, so whether you go STO or STS, you need to find direction and balance. Like for the term evil, I think how this word is used to represent certain things refer more to confusion than anything close to be harvestable.

[APeacefulWarrior]

Yeah. At least on the positive side, I tend to think a lot of polarized individuals are basically like Jimmy Stewart in It's A Wonderful Life, leading lives of quiet positivity without ever really drawing too much attention to themselves. Likewise, I'd suspect a lot of people who would be commonly described as "miserable bastards" or such are probably pushing towards negative polarization. "Great" acts in the historical sense would in no way be necessary.

[Aion]

I think they used historically well-known personages as examples for two reasons. One is for reference, I think they knew anybody would be able to research the names. Second I think it was for Don and was for his research benefit.

[Infinite Unity]

I think any group of entities would have a great deal of change in their social structures, technology, and day to day lives, as history as we know it progressed. So I believe the way humans and polarity go, actually change a fair amount as well. Not in the essence of polarity but the interaction between entities do. The progression in language, music, and art. Are good examples on how entities evolution of interaction and expression.

[unir 1]

I think crystallization of polarity is near harvestability of polarity, or having near "harvestable polarity" (while that may seem like a redundant term, an entity can be described as polarizing strongly).

In other words, crystallization of polarity must be the commitment to one sole polarity. Not quite to the point of harvestablility, but at minimum so.


"Harvestable polarity" will always be due to ignorance or the Veil, or not-knowing, coupled with faith/commitment to either positivity or negativity.

I guess all of us come into this density without knowing much but what we are taught here.


Those individuals with experiences which lead them to negative tendencies, who then adopt these tendencies and who excel in service-to-self and negative use of catalyst (control) will polarize negatively in our Veiled climate. As long as they reject heart chakra, or green-ray, energy and manage to serve their self as they desire, and control as much as they desire, they will consistently polarize negatively.


Entities who foster or develop the ability to understand other-self, to love and consistently love, to radiate their self; as long as they work with green-ray energy, giving of self to other-self without desiring to keep an eye out for reward to this, they begin to polarize positively.

Having a solid basis of self through one's experience and a balanced, unblocked flow of the energies of the lower rays, entities with a bias toward positivity can propel forwards to experience which works with higher energy centers.

There is no great knowing for these entities either, which is where "faith" comes in.

The description of the energy centers are merely indicators for what is possessed in one's self. Like the symptoms of a flu are not the virus itself. To desire to work with the energy centers is not the key.....to desire what one desires and to gain experience from this, is the key. To learn in this manner.

Knowing the technical information about all of this may lead to conscious seeking, but seeking should not be confused with an ultimate finding.
I doubt the positively oriented entities which Ra mentioned knew about polarity (as we each might understand it) or the energy centers.

Polarity itself is common for all conscious entities, since certain actions can be executed which are service-to-others or service-to-self in one's judgement. Thus a person would polarize, to whatever degree, toward one of the opposites.


Polarity to the degree of harvestability will be rare because of the quantity of those who are harvestable (that's to say, it is obviously seen as rare to polarize in favor of harvestability when the majority of individuals do not reach that).
It is rare because of what is required for harvestability, and because of the focus which most societies, countries, groups place on life -- focuses which do not always effectively emphasize or strengthen (i) stability of the individual's survival; (ii) the individual's ability to have a nonfluctuating mental state, and to explore it's mind and body faculties so to be able to learn to act independently; (iii) the stability* and harmony of family (or groups, not only groups which are like the mom & dad family, but accounting for groups in school as well) with which younger individuals grow (*stability in the sense that the previous conditions are consistently supported in the groups); (iv) consideration of other self and understanding of other-self; (v) communication between peoples who have grown in this type of environment.
I do not see that these are focuses of most countries. I more see focuses which control most of an entity's experience, which intentionally or unintentionally make it so that entities do not met those things, at least not easily, and focuses on empowering groups of people with agendas unrelated to the above.

While focus is not on such positive things, a country's society, a community, or a group of individuals will more likely have a mixed harvest, presuming its members qualify for harvestability through their way of life.

Without many entities to harvest, there would not be many instances of a harvestable polarity. So such polarity would be rare.
I'm accounting for the positive polarity only, though.

But to write briefly on the opposite, negative polarity: efficiently controlling others, manipulating others, exerting power over others, rejecting other self's responses and communications (unless to serve oneself), serving one's own wishes and having only one's own interest in mind with the previous conditions piled below this, and finally, rejecting compassion of others -- doing this consistently should eventually lead to harvestable, negative polarization.
When this is the common way of a life, there will of course be a greater opportunity (for entities living in such way) to polarize negatively.

You do have to be almost purely self-serving for the negative polarity's harvest, so someone who is widely regarded as evil or cunning with no trait or experience to denote that this particular someone would attempt to have consideration for others, would very likely be an entity with a crystallized polarity.
I do not think such cunning entities will always show their faces or inclinations.
Everyone takes their own path, for their own reasons.

And now oppositely, someone who is understanding of others, radiant in regards to self and in regards to love, with nothing to denote that this particular someone could possibly be disdainful of others, might very well be an entity who has a crystallized polarity but to the positive.


How common would either of these types of entity be? Not common at all, I say.
As a reminder, this was my own interpretation of a crystallized polarity. Everyone else here seems to have covered the other question sufficiently.

[AnthroHeart]

I've posted this before regarding polarity/harvestability:

[herald]

Harvestability does depend on balance of the lower energy centers, but only in my opinion, so that the entity may gain a sense of stability in utilizing the higher energies, because the lower three will be inactivated through the graduation process.
Perhaps the missing ingredient in the equation of why so many good people must repeat, is that the love given must be that of the fourth dimension, which is only naturally available to us through the veil.
Grasping this energy requires the spiraling within the m-b-s complex to move upwards and outwards instead of its usual inward flow. In the selfless acts we have access to this energy that is not going with the flow from the creator to benefit the self, but of our own conscious act of will towards what we perceive in 3D as Other.
This is the opportunity to become familiar with the inner world that becomes the body in the higher planes.

[Manjushri]

With no people harvested since earth began and only a few ascended masters "harvestable" positive and a few psycho genocide killers harvestable negative, perhaps the sad truth is that we are existing in a purgatory reality where progressing to higher levels of existence is virtually impossible.

On the flip side - If being harvestable only requires "Those who, finishing a cycle of experience, demonstrate various grades of distortion" (that all things are one) then it seems to me that nearly every person on this forum ought to be...

Also I just wanted to take this opportunity to say that out of the theee posts I have read today this is the third one using a Wikipedia article as a reference.

[APeacefulWarrior]

With no people harvested since earth began and only a few ascended masters "harvestable" positive and a few psycho genocide killers harvestable negative, perhaps the sad truth is that we are existing in a purgatory reality where progressing to higher levels of existence is virtually impossible.

However, it's about the journey rather than the destination. Regardless of the statistics for Earth-natives graduating, the point is the experience gained while incarnating here. And if someone repeats a few cycles and can't seem to graduate, then they're just plunked down on a different planet to see what it can teach them instead. No biggie. Live and learn, literally.

After all, third density is by far the shortest of the densities. So even a "protracted" stint on Earth is still a tiny fraction of the millions or billions of subjective years it takes to progress through the other densities.

Plus, we're not just doing this for ourselves. Ra pretty strongly suggested that the Creator desires novel and interesting experiences, which is something Earth is VERY good at providing. Part of existence is experiencing things on behalf of the Creator, and helping complete its logos work which is ultimately necessary for it to progress past the Octave. So I'd argue that to a certain extent, incarnating on Earth at all -regardless of immediate outcome- is still doing a pretty major service.