(06-18-2010, 05:58 AM)unity100 Wrote: the general tone and information that was out of his channelings were way out of touch anything resembling Ra.
This was mentioned in the point about conscious channeling - the channelers personality (physical mind / ego) flavours the information coming through.
unity Wrote:in case you remember, ra said that the Ra contact was done over a very narrow band. and Carla had very particular pre-incarnative conditions that was chosen to make it easier for her to get into trance and enable such a contact. and, throughout the work that was made for four books, you can read the difficulties, dedication they had to maintain and the effort they had to spare to keep the contact going. AND it was possible because of the extensive harmony within the group of that three people.
This was mentioned in the point regarding the fact that Carla channeled in a state of deep trance (unconsciously).
unity Wrote:he came up as a topic in another discussion forum. people were bashing him. despite my impression i have kept a moderate ground and told there was nothing wrong about giving hope to people. someone said that, because of the hopes he have given about the disclosure before, he believed him, and got frustrated. he probably also experienced some humiliation if he told about it to other people too, tho he didnt say.
Some people agree, some do not. These are our choices. If someone agrees, it will be because they are resonating at a similar vibration. Whether it was words from DW, Steven Greer, or another source, that person would agree due to the vibrational match. Putting faith in someone else's prediction is a lesson in of itself, one this person may benefit from for the rest of this incarnation.
unity Wrote:it is wrong to give extravagant hopes regarding anything like that. it is not as simple as 'it is up to people if it resonates with them or not'. he is not giving timeless, all encompassing general messages of love or hope. he is talking about events to happen in future.
This statement is one of judgment, projecting personal issues onto the situation. It is neither wrong, nor right, to express ones beliefs, passions or ideas. Each person is responsible for their own thoughts and decisions. That is the purpose of discernment, and free will.
This is the density of choice/rapid learning, and souls will choose (and hence resonate with) that which is aligned with their polarity, lessons, and path at that time.
unity Wrote:it may resonate with some people, those people may make decisions, or life changing decisions based on those messages, and may end up frustrated the least, or worse. thats a disservice.
Expressing ones self is not disservice, it's the meaning of our incarnations; to express, to choose, and experience. DW is speaking his own truth with hopes to help other people. If done in a genuinely loving way, this is service to others.
unity Wrote:well, i dont think he is right even on that front too. he does say that, but his messages, channelings dont come close to edgar cayce's either, in tone or content.
on another note, he seems to be an individual with ego issues. 'reincarnation of edgar cayce', 'channeler of Ra', 2 most prominent spiritual message sources of modern times, a predictor of events, a singer (he recently put out a single i believe), a speaker and so on.
he pretty much acts like an adolescent celebrity, in the words of someone who was in the discussion in the other forum i saw this topic came up.
I say this with love - defending personal beliefs of what's right and wrong is walking the path of judgment, which is the path of separation and non-acceptance; founded by fear.
A quote from Q'uo/Aaron...
Quote:This is the foundation for the work of all beings in third density. It is through the constant judgment of what you experience that self solidifies and enhances the illusion of separation. You are here to reconfirm that there is no separate self, that the self solidifies through dwelling in delusion. The more you fight with the presence of an emotion, the more self solidifies, the more sense there is, “I must get rid of this or that to purify myself.” What you have to do, then, is to change your relationship to that which arises in you.
This brings us back to the human living this life, feeling the closing lower chakras, feeling the arising of fear, anger, greed, prejudice, jealousy, whatever the emotion may be. Increasingly, you allow the perspective which finds compassion for the human tossed into emotions by the continuing catalysts of the incarnation. You become less and less reactive, more able to keep the heart open.
The Law of One is the path of unity and acceptance; founded by love. One must embrace, and give value to, what he or she considers the light and the dark, 'right' or 'wrong'. If we do not do this, we remain in an imbalanced state, hindering our spiritual evolution.
He indeed makes some prominent claims, and has openly stated that he has ego issues (which are also evident in his blog), and to not look up to him in any way or form. This however, should not tarnish the value of the information that he shares. Just like crop circles, his work is helping many people open their eyes, and to start thinking for themselves.
One must accept and love others for their uniqueness. This is a fundamental aspect of the Law of One.
L&L