06-22-2015, 06:11 AM
(06-21-2015, 03:54 PM)Berilac Sandydowns Wrote: To use the word Love as a descriptor for anything other than a very specific vibration or harmonic leaves a lot of room for error IMHO.
I'm not saying Love doesn't exist. It obviously does. We feel it. We act because of it.
It's an important catalyst. For us. Locally.
But to think of it as a foundation of Creation is not seeing The Big Picture... BIG enough.
A possibly relevant quote:
Quote:27.13 Questioner: Is Love— is there a manifestation of love that we could call vibration?
Ra: I am Ra. Again we reach semantic difficulties. The vibration or density of love or understanding is not a term used in the same sense as the second distortion, Love; the distortion Love being the great activator and primal co-Creator of various creations using intelligent infinity; the vibration love being that density in which those who have learned to do an activity called “loving” without significant distortion, then seek the ways of light or wisdom. Thus in vibratory sense love comes into light in the sense of the activity of unity in its free will. Love uses light and has the power to direct light in its distortions. Thus vibratory complexes recapitulate in reverse the creation in its unity, thus showing the rhythm or flow of the great heartbeat, if you will use this analogy.