I don't remember exactly where but I'm almost sure Ra said somewhere that he gave an answer in which not every part of Ra agreed between them about it. That seems to imply there's still some kind of fractal or sub individualisation with the cells. You could also see each wanderer from Ra as being an individualisation. They are here in 3D sure, but let's say they would all meditate and contact the social memory complex at the same time, I think they would still be individualized portions of Ra. Which means unless all distortions have been worked out in 6D, a social memory complex wouldn't have reached complete unity of self. But that's just my interpretation.
As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.
You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022)
x
02-08-2016, 11:19 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-08-2016, 11:21 PM by Adonai One.)
02-09-2016, 05:15 AM
(02-08-2016, 11:19 PM)Adonai One Wrote: http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?q=%...inction%22 (83.28) ? Quote:The instrument has an increasing ability to sense that which will aid its bodily complex. It is being aided by affirmations and also by the light which is the food of the density of resting. Isn't light the food of 6th density, not 5th density? This would mean that 6D is the density of resting. I thought it was 5D before.
02-09-2016, 08:17 AM
(02-09-2016, 05:15 AM)IndigoGeminiWolf Wrote: Isn't light the food of 6th density, not 5th density? This would mean that 6D is the density of resting. I thought it was 5D before. When Ra referred to the "density of resting" they were only calling it that because that is where Carla's spirit would rest when Ra was channelled. Her mind/body/spirit complex would leave the shell of yellow ray, and Ra would enter and speak. While they spoke, her spirit rested in its native density. Thus, it is not that a specific density is designated the "density of resting". Any density can be a place of rest and rejuvenation, even our 3rd density physical environment (you do rest don't you? Though judging by your posts timestamp, not at night haha).
02-09-2016, 02:42 PM
I wonder if higher density takes more mental focus to keep yourself balanced and to minimize distortions than 3D. In 6D it must be continuous balancing between wisdom and love for the infinitesimal distortions.
02-09-2016, 04:32 PM
Focus must be easier without a brain
02-09-2016, 06:31 PM
02-09-2016, 07:48 PM
(02-08-2016, 06:46 PM)matrix_drumr Wrote: I don't remember exactly where but I'm almost sure Ra said somewhere that he gave an answer in which not every part of Ra agreed between them about it. That seems to imply there's still some kind of fractal or sub individualisation with the cells. You could also see each wanderer from Ra as being an individualisation. They are here in 3D sure, but let's say they would all meditate and contact the social memory complex at the same time, I think they would still be individualized portions of Ra. Which means unless all distortions have been worked out in 6D, a social memory complex wouldn't have reached complete unity of self. But that's just my interpretation. Personally, I don't recall any passage where an aspect of Ra disagreed with another aspect of Ra. If you can find one, I'd love to read it, but to be honest, I don't think it exists.
02-09-2016, 10:18 PM
This would be more of a confirmation than a question, but I would still ask Ra:
Is it possible for there to be 2nd / 3rd density life that is not carbon / water based and does not require the narrow temperature spectrum similar to this planet's environment?
02-10-2016, 03:44 AM
(02-09-2016, 06:31 PM)Ankh Wrote:(02-09-2016, 04:32 PM)matrix_drumr Wrote: Focus must be easier without a brain It seems like a brain is only limited in focus about the amount of information you can process in the the present. Freewill is limiting focus on a whole other level. It's like a limit for everything you can't know or don't wanna know about the entire universe. (02-09-2016, 07:48 PM)anagogy Wrote:(02-08-2016, 06:46 PM)matrix_drumr Wrote: I don't remember exactly where but I'm almost sure Ra said somewhere that he gave an answer in which not every part of Ra agreed between them about it. That seems to imply there's still some kind of fractal or sub individualisation with the cells. You could also see each wanderer from Ra as being an individualisation. They are here in 3D sure, but let's say they would all meditate and contact the social memory complex at the same time, I think they would still be individualized portions of Ra. Which means unless all distortions have been worked out in 6D, a social memory complex wouldn't have reached complete unity of self. But that's just my interpretation. It may be a misinterpretation on my part or maybe I'm remembering a detail wrong. I'm gonna search a bit but without remembering the proper words that's kinda hard.
02-28-2016, 09:25 PM
I would like to ask Ra if the Quarantine currently in place prevents radio waves (and other similar electronic communication) from being received by 3rd density entities of this planet.
02-29-2016, 01:32 AM
(02-28-2016, 09:25 PM)Parsons Wrote: I would like to ask Ra if the Quarantine currently in place prevents radio waves (and other similar electronic communication) from being received by 3rd density entities of this planet. I'm relatively certain the answer to this is 'no.' The quarantine and veil prevents higher-density energies from getting through. Radio is a 3D thing, and radio waves are more like 1D. Also, Voyager 1 is well beyond the confines of the solar system at this point without picking up much of interest, and there's no reason it would be affected by an Earth-specific interdiction field. Not unless the barrier extends all the way to the Oort cloud,, anyway, which seems like overkill.
02-29-2016, 06:39 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-29-2016, 06:41 AM by APeacefulWarrior.)
As far as Ra's we-ness vs one-ness, I think the trick is realizing that it's both at the same time. Both are true, just depending on what perspective one is looking from. Ra-the-Personality is a singular entity created out of the energetic interactions of the various entities that make up Ra's social memory complex. But each of those sub-entities is still separate and distinct as well, simultaneously being themselves as well as contributing to the gestalt overmind.
It's sort of like our relationship to our own bodies. A person's liver is, from one point of view, a separate object from the person themselves. That liver has very specific functions and duties which the person couldn't otherwise replicate without it. (And they wouldn't have too much time to try.) Or the various micro-organisms that call our bodies home. A person's gut bacteria are "part of them" from one standpoint, yet from the POV of the bacteria themselves, they're separate singular organisms trying to live their teeny lives as best they can. Their lives just happen to be lived in a body-world whose continued wellbeing they help ensure, without ever being aware of it. That's why Ra says there's no distinction between singular and plural when talking about him\them. He is both. (02-29-2016, 01:32 AM)APeacefulWarrior Wrote:(02-28-2016, 09:25 PM)Parsons Wrote: I would like to ask Ra if the Quarantine currently in place prevents radio waves (and other similar electronic communication) from being received by 3rd density entities of this planet. So of the approximately 18 million worlds that have 3rd density life in the Milky Way, none have developed radio technology in the past 80-100k years? (Explanation of the math I did: A} Our galaxy is approximately 100k light years across, so if two planets were at the very edge of the galaxy, it would take 100k years for radio waves to reach from one to the other. We are not quite at the very edge of the galaxy, so it would be less than 100k. B} Ra gave us figures for how many worlds have life regardless of density and the percentage of each density in session 16 - http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?s=16#26. Ra said that 27% of the 67 million inhabited worlds are 3D, so 18 million.) What about radio waves from other 3D planets in close neighboring galaxies? (Our neighbor the Andromeda galaxy is a juggernaut in comparison: is has an (estimated) 1 trillion stars to our (estimated) 100 billion. If there is a similar ratio of 3D worlds, that would mean they would have about 180 million. Andromeda is about 2.5 million lightyears away, meaning radio waves would reach us in that timeframe. 2.5 million years is a blink of an eye in galactic terms and not all planets start 3d at the same time as evidenced by Venus, Maldek and Mars.) Just combining those numbers and ignoring any other nearby galaxies, there would currently be roughly 200 million 3D worlds within 2.5 million lightyears. I would imagine the odds of not a single one of those worlds developing and employing radio technology within the past 2.5 million years to be astronomical (no pun intended). Even just with the confirmed 18 million, it would still be highly unlikely / astronomical. A more specific example I would like to highlight is that Ra told us that 3D beings "of a fairly high order" visited us from the Sirius star system, which is only 8.6 light years away. They had the technology to come here in spacecraft, but they never bothered to develop Radio technology? Furthermore, if one of our closest neighboring star systems has 3D life of such highly advanced technology, what are the odds that a star within say, 100 light years (because we invented the radio about 100 years ago), would not develop radio technology? I'm not sure if I am calculating this correctly because there is "square light years" involved, but 100 light years out of 100k light years = 1000 (1 thousandth the size of the diameter of the galaxy). So assuming the 3D worlds are spread out roughly evenly throughout the galaxy, 18 million 3D planets / 1000 = 18,000 (18k) 3D planets within only 100 light years. Even if my math is off and the planets are not uniformly distributed, I'm sure there is a minimum of several hundred - several thousand 3D planets within 100 light years since there's 18 million in the galaxy. tl;dr - My original question on if the quarantine prevents radio waves was basically a rhetorical one considering the sheer number of 3D planets in our galaxy and (presumably) in neighboring galaxies. I highly doubt we were the only one of those worlds who has employed radio technology within the 100 years since it's been invented. So to answer your question about Voyager 1, I'm assuming that the quarantine would also extend to 3D technology no matter where we deploy it.
03-01-2016, 02:12 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-01-2016, 02:17 AM by APeacefulWarrior.)
There are loads of issues with the Fermi Paradox and too many unknowns to be able to accurately assess whether we "should" be picking up outside radio waves.
The speed of light is of course the biggest problem. We're living in a relatively sparse area of the milky way galaxy. There may be millions of potentially inhabited systems, but most of them are way too far away for meaningful contact to actually occur. Signal strength is also a factor here. Even "empty" space is filled with things which can disrupt and distort radio waves. It's entirely possible we're being bombarded by alien radio signals and have no way of telling because they're so degraded they're just part of the background noise. Or maybe the waves aren't even aimed at Earth at all. And that's assuming they're using radio at all AND broadcasting at high enough strengths that the waves could actually go 100LY or 100,000LY or even more. Nothing says this is necessarily the case. High-power RF broadcasting is a relatively ineffectient method of transmission. Even here on Earth, we're starting to move away from it. Just look at the shift from terrestrial radio to Internet radio, and from broadcast TV to cable-based systems. And what if they aren't as veiled as us and have telepathy, which would render radio unnecessary? I tend to think radio broadcasting would turn out to be a transient form of communication. Or then there's the issue of encoding. A transmission that is tightly encoded would be virtually impossible for us to crack, and might not even be recognizable as informational at all. And that's assuming it's containing information we can potentially comprehend. If a hypothetical alien species communicated by scent, for example, encoding smells as RF waves, we would NEVER work that out without a primer. It would just be another "well, that's funny" radio blip that no one can ever prove to be of alien origin. For us to pick up an alien broadcast and recognize it as such, it would have to be A)aimed at Earth with, B)an extremely high-power broadcast, C)on frequencies we're scanning for, D)unencoded or deliberately including a primer, and E)coming from a species which developed and continued using radio almost exactly X years ago where X equals their distance in light years. So does it really seem THAT hard to believe we haven't picked up any signals we recognized?
03-01-2016, 03:09 PM
Touché. I was under the assumption that radio broadcasts would remain clear for thousands of light-years at minimum assuming they didn't pass through something that is naturally radio-noisy (such as a star or a black hole).
I would still like to confirm that question with Ra.
03-01-2016, 08:48 PM
Dolores Cannon's subjects frequently (as in, multiple separate people) mentioned that they use something more like gamma rays for communication, which is why we aren't picking them up - we're simply not looking for communications at those frequencies -- probably because they are damaging to humans so we assume that they would be equally so to other life forms. Which is silly of course.
03-29-2016, 07:07 PM
I would like to clarify how many stars approximately are in the Milky Way (or 'Major Galaxy' as Don termed it). The current rough count that modern science (mostly) agrees on is 100 billion, but Ra throws out the figure 250 billion:
Quote:28.8 Questioner: Let’s take as an example the planet that we are on now and tell me how much of the creation was created by the same Logos that created this planet? I am just wondering if there may have been a misunderstanding between Ra and Don on what Don was referring to. I am thinking there is a small possibility Ra may have been referring to the Milky Way plus a few close, small neighboring galaxies such as the Large Magellanic Cloud. Either that, or the 100 billion figure is a bit short (which is understandable considering we only have a view from the edge of the Milky Way). Either way, I would be interested to clarify exactly what they were referring to.
04-02-2016, 12:04 PM
(04-11-2015, 07:02 PM)Jeremy Wrote:(04-11-2015, 06:57 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote:(04-11-2015, 06:56 PM)Jeremy Wrote: I would have inquired about the in-between incarnational experience. actually to jump in late in this conversation he does mention this and goes more into detail about the more advanced souls in destiny of souls he goes on to talk about the different specializations a soul will undergo there is the nursery mother, for new souls, there is the animal soul specialist that tracks down any pets you had in any past life, there is the explorer soul, that starts training with simple hide and seek, there are guides, there are so many jobs it feels like a massively multiplayer mmorpg rofl. and it is really really exciting!!!! at least in my personal opinion.
04-02-2016, 12:16 PM
(04-12-2015, 01:25 AM)APeacefulWarrior Wrote: One aspect I found fascinating about the channelled materials is the implication that a sense of humor persists through at least 6D. (And nearly everyone tends to suspect God has a sense of humor as well. ) I'd ask Ra if he could give examples of what a 4D, 5D, and 6D construct would find funny. i think they like irony =̴̶̷̤̄ .̫ =̴̶̷̤̄ it's not necessarily damaging or insulting to anyone, but is an observation of what is to be silly. light hearted enough to not warrant any negative polarization, but still bratty just my take.
04-02-2016, 03:32 PM
To me the Creator is the infinite and eternal child.
(04-02-2016, 12:16 PM)BlatzAdict Wrote:(04-12-2015, 01:25 AM)APeacefulWarrior Wrote: One aspect I found fascinating about the channelled materials is the implication that a sense of humor persists through at least 6D. (And nearly everyone tends to suspect God has a sense of humor as well. ) I'd ask Ra if he could give examples of what a 4D, 5D, and 6D construct would find funny. Quote:37.5 Questioner: We will attempt to work around these problems in dissemination of the Law of One. It will take some careful work to do this but we will. I personally will not cease while still incarnate to attempt to disseminate this. I believe it will be necessary to write a book, most probably about UFOs since the Law of One is connected with the phenomenon. It’s connected with all phenomena, but this is the… seems to be the easiest entry into dissemination. My first plan is to, using the UFO in the advertising sense that it was meant by the Confederation, use this as an entry into an explanation of the process of evolution that has gone on on this planet and how the rest of the… or the Confederation has been involved in a more understandable way, shall I say, for the population who will read it, using the Ra material in undistorted form just as it has been recorded here in various places through the book to amplify and clarify what we are saying in the book. This is the only way that I can see right now to create enough dissemination for the people who would like to have the Law of One for them to be able to get it. I could just go ahead and print up the material we have off the tape recorder and publish it but we would be unable to disseminate it very well because of distribution problems. Will you comment on my second idea of doing a general book on UFOs including the material from the Law of One? :Knock knock :Who's there :Ra :Ra Who? :No need to get exited it's only Ra
04-02-2016, 07:11 PM
I would ask Ra if they were the ones who helped me untie the mental knot that I had formed years ago. It was a puzzle to undo.
04-04-2017, 04:41 AM
(02-08-2016, 11:52 AM)IndigoGeminiWolf Wrote: I did see Ra in miniature and I asked if they were gay. They said no. But they didn't say "I am Ra" before that. So I don't know if it was really them. One of my schizophrenic episodes. One time I was speaking ancient Egyptian or so I thought. Maybe, like a certain ex-President of the United States or a certain late Director of the U.S. Federal Investigation Bureau, they were just "keeping it on the down-low" for expediency's sake? Miniature Ra's are notoriously tricky about things in general, much less hot-button topics like that one (especially in today's "Social Justice Warrior" social climate. Cheers! Aten-Ra A Tiny Ra
04-04-2017, 09:56 AM
I think somehow this is where the material went off-track and perhaps the biggest distortion in it :
Quote:1.7 Questioner: [The question was lost because the questioner was sitting too far from the tape recorder to be recorded.] My question : What would've been said if you had been answered "yes" as to whether or not you may enunciate in more detail what you have said to be communicating with the group to transmit?
02-21-2018, 09:26 PM
Did they ever ask Ra about Krishna or the Vedas? I'd like to ask Ra who were Krishna and the Rishis who received the Vedas through their spiritual practice
|
|