05-21-2012, 08:44 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-21-2012, 08:57 PM by Tenet Nosce.)
(05-21-2012, 06:05 PM)ShinAr Wrote: If I was to pile a bunch of leaves and dry grass in the middle of the lawn, light it on fire and tell you that you could have a spiritually enlightening experience if you would place your head over it and inhale the smoke, what would you tell me?
If it were merely leaves and dry grass, I would perhaps ask if you hadn't already smoked something else beforehand!
But in all seriousness, why are we here if not to use physicality as a means of having a spiritual experience? What makes one method any better than another?
For example, consider meditation. Some months ago I was preparing to give a talk on the interconnectedness of human beings, the sun and the earth, to a group of yogis. In my preparations, it occurred to me that I might be able to find some physical mechanism to explain the effects of certain meditative practices on the pineal gland, as it is often considered to be the mediator of spiritual experiences, through the secretion of a molecule called DMT.
I went back to the basic anatomy, and looked at the neurological input to the pineal gland. I found there are four neural ganglia (kind of like mini-brains or relay stations) that feed into the pineal gland. Turns out each of them is activated by a different behavior or activity that is associated with meditative practices.
One of them is located near the top of the cervical spine, right at the point where the neck flexes and extends when one is nodding. Thus, its activity is modulated by the specific angle at which the head rests upon the spine. Turns out the ideal angle is achieved by sitting with the spine fully erect, and the head positioned about 10-15 degrees below a line parallel with the ground. Just as the yogis recommend.
A second ganglion is stretched across a little plateau of bone in the inner ear, and responds to vibration, such as is generated by chanting, toning, hitting a gong, or ringing a bell or one of those Tibetan bowls.
A third one is related to the olfactory nerve, which translates our sense of smell as well as the sensation of air moving through the nasal cavity. Thus it is activated by the lighting of incense, and focusing one's awareness on the tip of the nose where the air is moving in and out. Another nerve from this ganglion drops down through the head and emerges right at the point where the hard palate meets the soft palate- exactly where yogis advise to place the tongue during meditative practice.
The fourth one is related to our perception of light and motion. Turns out that the perfect way to activate this one is to focus one's gaze at a flickering candlelight in an otherwise dim room... again just as the yogis recommend!
Point being... the human body is very specifically hard-wired to translate physical sensation into spiritual experience. If I were to say to a practitioner of meditation- oh you are just using physical sensations, such as sight, touch, smell, and sound in order to "artificially induce" a spiritual experience in your consciousness, most people would say... um... yes exactly! And this is "wrong" because...?
The question I am trying to get at is... it all comes down to chemical changes in the brain which are induced by physical things. I don't really see how the use of ingesting plant substances, such as tobacco, marijuana, ayahuasca, etc. are intrinsically any "worse" than straightening the spine, or burning incense, or striking a metal bowl, or lighting a candle.
In the final analysis, each "artificially induces" certain changes in the state of consciousness of an individual. And at the end of the day, that person is responsible for translating those experiences into something practical that can be applied in everyday life. If they are able to do this, then the experience was worth the effort. If not, then it was just another "escape from physical reality", and potentially addictive. I can think of quite a few yogis that appear to be using their "spiritual practice" as a means from escaping the challenges of everyday life.