12-10-2021, 05:31 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-27-2022, 02:55 PM by Dekalb_Blues.)
Friday Afternoon In The Universe
![[Image: a6d946f5-b7da-4dc8-bf8a-3f6e030908e0.jpg.webp]](https://image.scoopwhoop.com/w620/s3.scoopwhoop.com/anj/ssc/a6d946f5-b7da-4dc8-bf8a-3f6e030908e0.jpg.webp)
Channelled material excerpted from the mysterious "Lost Sessions":
??.? Questioner: A young acquaintance of ours has asked us to ask you this question, which frankly we don't understand. It is, "What’s the difference between a stoner and the Sun?"
Not Ra: I ain't Ra. Presumably your young seeker of the truth is querying about the third-density aspects of both entities. It would not infringe upon your free will for us to simply point out that from within the temporal limitations imposed upon your perception by your current shared distortion only one of the two entities mentioned is already burnt-out.
Questioner: [questioner.exe has stopped working]
??.? Questioner: Can you help us with the answer to this ancient conundrum that is inscribed on a clay tablet recently found by archeologists in a secret chamber under the Sphinx? It seems to deal with a dialogue between two masons, perhaps? Or maybe the artisans who carved hieroglyphs and sculpted bas-relief figures in stone? It translates as: "Two stoners are talking about religion, and the first one says, 'Dude. Did you know that like, uh, God -- has a name?' The other stoner says, 'Really, dude? No way!' The first one replies..." But the rest of the tablet is broken-off right at that point. Can you tell us--
Not Ra: I ain't Ra. The first one's reply? Sure can.
Questioner: (after waiting a minute) O.K., will you tell us?
Not Ra: I ain't Ra. Indications point to yes, for there is the highest probability of us relating the sought-after answer to your query. Indeed its probability is high enough to be congruent for all practical statistical purposes with what you would term certainty.
Questioner: (after waiting two minutes) Oh, for [expletive deleted]'s sake! (one-minute pause to get hyperventilation under control) Alright. Fine. O.K. then, please tell us the answer now. Pretty please. With [expletive deleted] sugar on top.
Not Ra: I ain't Ra. Right. The first one replies... "Yahweh!"
Questioner: (unintelligible strangled noises)
Not Ra: I ain't Ra. Indeed this risible verbal distortion merits the due pondering-upon in proper contemplation for full comprehension of its many and varying deeply archetypal metaphysical facets of meaning which in aggregate shine majestically in the darkness as does a shaft of sunlit gold, like a stream of bat's--
[End of recording due to tape machine being thrown through window]
![[Image: a6d946f5-b7da-4dc8-bf8a-3f6e030908e0.jpg.webp]](https://image.scoopwhoop.com/w620/s3.scoopwhoop.com/anj/ssc/a6d946f5-b7da-4dc8-bf8a-3f6e030908e0.jpg.webp)
Channelled material excerpted from the mysterious "Lost Sessions":
??.? Questioner: A young acquaintance of ours has asked us to ask you this question, which frankly we don't understand. It is, "What’s the difference between a stoner and the Sun?"
Not Ra: I ain't Ra. Presumably your young seeker of the truth is querying about the third-density aspects of both entities. It would not infringe upon your free will for us to simply point out that from within the temporal limitations imposed upon your perception by your current shared distortion only one of the two entities mentioned is already burnt-out.
Questioner: [questioner.exe has stopped working]
??.? Questioner: Can you help us with the answer to this ancient conundrum that is inscribed on a clay tablet recently found by archeologists in a secret chamber under the Sphinx? It seems to deal with a dialogue between two masons, perhaps? Or maybe the artisans who carved hieroglyphs and sculpted bas-relief figures in stone? It translates as: "Two stoners are talking about religion, and the first one says, 'Dude. Did you know that like, uh, God -- has a name?' The other stoner says, 'Really, dude? No way!' The first one replies..." But the rest of the tablet is broken-off right at that point. Can you tell us--
Not Ra: I ain't Ra. The first one's reply? Sure can.
Questioner: (after waiting a minute) O.K., will you tell us?
Not Ra: I ain't Ra. Indications point to yes, for there is the highest probability of us relating the sought-after answer to your query. Indeed its probability is high enough to be congruent for all practical statistical purposes with what you would term certainty.
Questioner: (after waiting two minutes) Oh, for [expletive deleted]'s sake! (one-minute pause to get hyperventilation under control) Alright. Fine. O.K. then, please tell us the answer now. Pretty please. With [expletive deleted] sugar on top.
Not Ra: I ain't Ra. Right. The first one replies... "Yahweh!"
Questioner: (unintelligible strangled noises)
Not Ra: I ain't Ra. Indeed this risible verbal distortion merits the due pondering-upon in proper contemplation for full comprehension of its many and varying deeply archetypal metaphysical facets of meaning which in aggregate shine majestically in the darkness as does a shaft of sunlit gold, like a stream of bat's--
[End of recording due to tape machine being thrown through window]