05-31-2020, 07:27 PM
One is other, thus one can't be without the other.
I feel the answer is accurate, but there is a problem. It seems the reason, but at the same time not. Lets replace confusion with sufference and clarity with bliss. Isn't it possible to feel or desire bliss without having to feel sufference? Assuming all is one that would be impossible, but illusion or not, I can imagine bliss being without sufference. It is a perfect feeling and once felt, to me, one is just drawn to it. This means that, although sufference helps by providing further motivation, it doesn't appear necessary. The same applies for confusion and clarity. Confusion doesn't appear necessary for clarity to be. Again, in some level I understand how confusion would help one reach clarity but I can't see it as something absolutely, utterly necessary.
I feel the answer is accurate, but there is a problem. It seems the reason, but at the same time not. Lets replace confusion with sufference and clarity with bliss. Isn't it possible to feel or desire bliss without having to feel sufference? Assuming all is one that would be impossible, but illusion or not, I can imagine bliss being without sufference. It is a perfect feeling and once felt, to me, one is just drawn to it. This means that, although sufference helps by providing further motivation, it doesn't appear necessary. The same applies for confusion and clarity. Confusion doesn't appear necessary for clarity to be. Again, in some level I understand how confusion would help one reach clarity but I can't see it as something absolutely, utterly necessary.