(11-22-2010, 04:43 PM)Aaron Wrote: (Although I am of the opinion that once a responsible and mature relationship with the planet is established, our population can be nourished entirely with plant material. I seem to have distant memories of it being done on third density venus... )
Agreed!
(11-22-2010, 04:43 PM)Aaron Wrote: So any information I'm giving isn't trying to sway anyone to one side or the other, it's just information that I've found interesting and expanding on the subject.
ok! Thanks for sharing!
(11-22-2010, 04:43 PM)Aaron Wrote: With that in mind, I would like to invite you to read a Kryon channeling session that addresses the topic of consumption of animals. You may have already read it or it may not resonate with you at all. If either of those are the case, I apologize in advance.
No need to apologize! Many things said on this forum, and even in the Law of One, might resonate with some of use but not others. That's absolutely ok!
I did read the Kryon info you posted, and it didn't resonate with me at all.
I respect that you have found the info useful, and I thank you for sharing it. As is being discussed on our 'other channeled sources' sub-forum, most channeled info is about spiritual matters, and therefore subjective, so each of us can have a different opinion about it, and no one can say one is right or wrong.
But in the case of info that is demonstrable, provable, tangible, that is where it's easy to prove or disprove a particular bit of data.
In this case, I have no opinion about Kryon because I have never read anything from Kryon, until now. But in that little segment about eating animals, I found it to be provably, demonstrably, and tangibly incorrect.
It may be that Kryon is a pure, undistorted source on spiritual matters - I have no idea - but on this issue, my opinion is that this source is distorted, probably due to bias.
This isn't because of my own bias in favor of eating a vegetarian diet for spiritual and ethical reasons, but because of scientific facts.
Quote:Many don't like to hear this, but understand that collectively the animals understand this. They have to be part of the Human food chain, since humanity doesn't have the ability to grow things fast enough and distribute that food.
This is where he lost me, because, well, it's simply not true, on both counts. Aside from, perhaps, the occasional exception due to unusual medical conditions, animals don't have to be part of the food chain, as far as humans are concerned, because there is overwhelming scientific data proving that humans don't need to eat animals, and in fact are, in general, healthier if they don't eat animals.
It's also simply not true that "humanity doesn't have the ability to grow things fast enough and distribute that food." Not only is this not true, but it's glaringly and patently false, because it takes much more plant life to feed the farm animals than it does to feed the humans directly. It's much more efficient to grow and distribute plant foods than animal foods. If everyone on the planet became vegetarian, we wouldn't have many of the problems we face today, regarding shortage of resources, pollution, etc. In fact the meat and dairy industries account for the bulk of the assault on the environment!
Again, I usually try to avoid ever saying something is 'wrong' but in this case, the above statements simply do not agree with what we know to be proven and factual.
The subjective decision about whether to eat animals or not is based on many factors, but I would hope that, at the very least, the decision can be made on facts rather than on inaccuracies.
Again, I appreciate your sharing the info! And I respect that Kryon apparently resonates with you. I'm just expressing my own opinion about Kryon's opinion. My statements about the inaccuracies regarding tangible facts, can be backed up with a little research.