Acceptance, Approval, and Other "A" Words

[Tenet Nosce]

I was interacting with someone who has pretty strong indigo energy, I knew he was able to read my energy, and I didn't want him to. So when I felt him "reading" me , I just simply said inwardly "No, you are are not given permission to read my energy field, I am creating a boundary and you are not welcome in it. Please stop" As soon as I did that, I felt him leave. He was someone who respects those kinds of boundaries.

I find it shocking how many New Agey "love and light" type folks feel it's appropriate to hack into other people's minds without their permission.

[BrownEye]

Do you have any suggestions for shielding without reflecting back the negative energy? That's where I get stuck. I just don't like the idea of doing anything intentionally to reflect negative energy. It feels wrong to me.

I did make a mix of crushed selenite and sea salt and sprinkled it along our mutual property line with the intent of protecting everything on this side of the line. That did seem to help a tiny bit, so maybe I just need to do it again.

Many times what gives us the creeps is not the person, but something living in/on the person. I am very aware of these things and many times will remove them from my coworkers just so we can have a good day.

I usually say hello to him - he doesn't respond

Some people are no longer "there". They sometimes become what they have attracted to them.

[Ruth]

Do you have any suggestions for shielding without reflecting back the negative energy? That's where I get stuck. I just don't like the idea of doing anything intentionally to reflect negative energy. It feels wrong to me.

I did make a mix of crushed selenite and sea salt and sprinkled it along our mutual property line with the intent of protecting everything on this side of the line. That did seem to help a tiny bit, so maybe I just need to do it again.

Many times what gives us the creeps is not the person, but something living in/on the person. I am very aware of these things and many times will remove them from my coworkers just so we can have a good day.

I usually say hello to him - he doesn't respond

Some people are no longer "there". They sometimes become what they have attracted to them.

Oh Pickle, what a beautiful idea! And you know, that really makes sense to me in this case. How do you go about removing such an entity?

Love & Light!

[BrownEye]

Abracadabra

[zenmaster]

I was interacting with someone who has pretty strong indigo energy, I knew he was able to read my energy, and I didn't want him to. So when I felt him "reading" me , I just simply said inwardly "No, you are are not given permission to read my energy field, I am creating a boundary and you are not welcome in it. Please stop" As soon as I did that, I felt him leave. He was someone who respects those kinds of boundaries.

I find it shocking how many New Agey "love and light" type folks feel it's appropriate to hack into other people's minds without their permission.

I wonder what the difference between no barriers to mind in a 4D environment (no 'permission' required, presumably), and someone reading using indigo would be?

You do understand that people 'pollute' their info all the time also, forcing it on people to be picked up. Not shocking if its unconsciously sent to all without people's permission, only shocking if it's consciously read without permission? I guarantee one can always be seen as more violent or intrusive than the other. What is the social contract in this regard?

[Tenet Nosce]

I wonder what the difference between no barriers to mind in a 4D environment (no 'permission' required, presumably), and someone reading using indigo would be?

I would presume in 4D there would be no one-way mirror effect.

You do understand that people 'pollute' their info all the time also, forcing it on people to be picked up. Not shocking if its unconsciously sent to all without people's permission, only shocking if it's consciously read without permission? I guarantee one can always be seen as more violent or intrusive than the other. What is the social contract in this regard?

I'm not talking about that which would be akin to placing personally sensitive information in one's trash bin. Once it's out on the curb, it enters the public domain.

I'm talking about actively probing another person's mind without their being aware of it. I suppose one could argue that awareness equates to consent. But consent without awareness? Not at the level of conscious mind- that is a violation.

Using intuition and the spirit shuttle to get information from other levels of mind wouldn't be a violation because it is within the purview of the spirit to deliver the "right" information. That's what makes it nonviolent.

Another example- sending "love and light" to specific people who haven't asked for it. It is a violation because it denies that "love and light" are intelligent and know where to go. Nonviolent approach would be to radiate "love and light" out to all beings everywhere and allow it to decide where to go.

Alternative nonviolent method would be to look within and see where the "other" resides, and ask for the information desired.

So I suppose the social contract grows out of the awareness that out of all levels of the mind: subconscious, group, planetary, archetypical, cosmic, the conscious mind is really the only one which is individualized. It is what it is, and is that for a reason.

... and besides... who really wants to sit around and hear everybody else's inner chatter going on around you? I don't think that's what goes on in 4D, or what is meant by group telepathy.

[AnthroHeart]

I think that in 4D we only hear other thoughts that resonate at the vibration we are currently at. We shouldn't pick up other mind chatter if it's not at a comparable vibration. So I don't think we pick up everyone's chatter at once.

[Plenum]

Acceptance is one of the most powerful 'actions' one can take.

it brings 'unity' to the two things that were 'separate' before. For eg; an individual (say me) 'accepts' certain aspects of their past, and they are no longer seen as 'separate'. The lack of separation then removes any sense of the 'other' from the equation; and this state is one step closer to a totally unified consciousness (which was always there but we fragment via the perception of the illusion (separate beings and actors)).

as Tenet said, acceptance does not equate to condonement; but it is 'accepting' and acknowledging another of the infinite number of potentials of intelligent infinity. The more we 'accept' the more 'infinity' of which we partake of.

these days, the majority of my 'practice' revolves around the verb acceptance. It has proven (for me) the fastest accelerator to unity consciousness.