10-06-2012, 12:18 PM
One of the reasons I posted this was because I saw an article being promoted yesterday on certain "alternative health news" sites that said this study showed NO benefit, whatsoever.
It actually showed a MODEST benefit. Not enough for me to get or recommend flu shots, but that's not the point.
The point is: What is the truth?
Is it fair or right to "fight" disinformation with disinformation? Isn't the "champion" of natural health who misrepresents and lies in order to support their "cause" just as guilty as the "mainstream" medical profession they are railing against?
It actually showed a MODEST benefit. Not enough for me to get or recommend flu shots, but that's not the point.
The point is: What is the truth?
Is it fair or right to "fight" disinformation with disinformation? Isn't the "champion" of natural health who misrepresents and lies in order to support their "cause" just as guilty as the "mainstream" medical profession they are railing against?