Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Community Olio Prejudice, science, etc.

    Thread: Prejudice, science, etc.


    Shin'Ar

    Guest
     
    #28
    09-30-2012, 07:27 AM
    (09-30-2012, 03:07 AM)zenmaster Wrote:
    (09-29-2012, 09:28 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: Your average person on the street is given the impression that these practices are backed by some kind of scientific evidence, when in fact there is little, if any at all.
    I'm not sure that healthcare advice in the hands of others, when one does not appreciate one's own needs, is a significant impediment for incarnation here in the first place.



    black hole = science

    where the matter goes in it = pseudoscience


    I just watched a news report on black holes where they discussed the science around it.

    They admit that they still remain a mystery and can only theorize about them.

    But even in their admission of that they still avoid asking the most obvious question.

    They talk about expansion and massive implosion, density and how all nearby matter is sucked into the hole.

    But what I would ask is WHERE is the stuff going after it goes in there?

    Is there not a law of displacement that speaks to matter not just disappearing, but merely taking another form?

    They do not ask that question because they hate to admit that there is something else out there besides that which they can see, that does not conform to their science of physics. Or that might blow all their theories to hell.

    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked for this post:1 member thanked for this post
      • Parsons
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Prejudice, science, etc. - by zenmaster - 09-26-2012, 08:42 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Patrick - 09-28-2012, 08:43 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Siren - 09-28-2012, 10:21 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Patrick - 09-28-2012, 11:37 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Cyan - 09-29-2012, 02:30 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 09-29-2012, 08:14 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by zenmaster - 09-29-2012, 09:13 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 09-30-2012, 01:31 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 09-29-2012, 09:28 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by zenmaster - 09-30-2012, 03:07 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Shin'Ar - 09-30-2012, 07:27 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by zenmaster - 09-30-2012, 10:49 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 09-30-2012, 11:33 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by zenmaster - 10-01-2012, 12:47 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 10-01-2012, 02:46 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by zenmaster - 10-02-2012, 09:56 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Parsons - 10-03-2012, 07:06 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Patrick - 10-03-2012, 12:21 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 10-03-2012, 12:55 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Cyan - 10-03-2012, 01:33 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 10-03-2012, 01:43 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 10-02-2012, 09:27 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Cyan - 10-02-2012, 09:49 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 10-02-2012, 09:53 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Cyan - 10-02-2012, 10:09 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 10-02-2012, 03:11 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Shin'Ar - 10-02-2012, 06:21 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Patrick - 10-02-2012, 11:06 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Parsons - 10-02-2012, 03:13 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Patrick - 10-03-2012, 01:06 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 10-03-2012, 01:19 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by hogey11 - 09-26-2012, 01:46 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by Patrick - 09-26-2012, 02:24 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by hogey11 - 09-26-2012, 03:19 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by Cyan - 09-26-2012, 03:35 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by Patrick - 09-26-2012, 03:39 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by hogey11 - 09-26-2012, 06:33 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by Parsons - 09-26-2012, 07:44 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by zenmaster - 09-26-2012, 08:48 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by hogey11 - 09-26-2012, 11:42 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by Parsons - 09-27-2012, 11:12 AM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by zenmaster - 09-27-2012, 08:27 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by Parsons - 09-27-2012, 11:52 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by zenmaster - 09-28-2012, 12:00 AM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by Parsons - 09-28-2012, 01:19 AM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by zenmaster - 09-29-2012, 02:19 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by Cyan - 09-28-2012, 01:32 AM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by Shin'Ar - 09-28-2012, 06:42 AM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode