09-28-2012, 10:21 AM
Science is (more often than not) a very polemical topic—one that, for obvious reasons, I rarely ever get involved in. I would have to say that science (generally-speaking) is more concerned with "the art of debunking" than with the sincere seeking of truth; more interested in controlling nature with technological gadgets than in understanding the cosmic oneness of all things. Perhaps I'm slightly prejudiced, but this is what I witness 95% of the time when I see/hear a heated scientific debate: one person/group trying to discredit the other with their own scientific facts/evidence (and this is especially true when you pit science against religion).
I've said this several times throughout my life: science, to me, is no different than religion; in fact, I consider it a religion in and of itself—a cold religion, if you will. The main difference between science and other religions is that science holds a substantially greater degree of authority over the people; that is, the general public seems to more readily accept (without question) anything that comes with a "scientifically-proven" tag.
(If memory serves right, this very same science claimed this planet was flat and that the universe revolved around it not very long ago. Yet people today take "scientific facts" as facts just as they did a thousand years ago, never questioning the accuracy of such "facts.")
But perhaps more importantly, something that is never taken into account is that there is a public science (for the general masses) and a private science (run by the shadow gov, secretive cabals and military-industrial complex)—and there is an immense gap between these two. The scientific community is heavily compartmentalized, yet people naively believe that the scientific breakthroughs they see on TV or read on a web-zine are the science, when in fact it's almost a joke in comparison to the actual scientific achievements of the human race. Were this not so, everyone would be riding UFOs nowadays instead of automobiles, and nobody would be paying electricity bills because everything would be powered by so-called "free energy." And yet, it's the 21st century already and people are still depending on oil. But of course, this is no accident.
And people think man went to the moon just once? (Oh, but that was debunked too, wasn't it?) I won't claim to know or believe or think anything here, I will simply say this: may I suggest certain elite pockets of 3rd-density human-beings are already well established not only on the Moon but on planet Mars as well?
Food for thought.
The funny thing that the very definition of science is: "knowledge acquired via study;" which, by definition, would make everyone a scientist—for what is living if not gradual learning and self-development catalyzed by the continual acquisition of knowledge through experience?
I've said this several times throughout my life: science, to me, is no different than religion; in fact, I consider it a religion in and of itself—a cold religion, if you will. The main difference between science and other religions is that science holds a substantially greater degree of authority over the people; that is, the general public seems to more readily accept (without question) anything that comes with a "scientifically-proven" tag.
(If memory serves right, this very same science claimed this planet was flat and that the universe revolved around it not very long ago. Yet people today take "scientific facts" as facts just as they did a thousand years ago, never questioning the accuracy of such "facts.")
But perhaps more importantly, something that is never taken into account is that there is a public science (for the general masses) and a private science (run by the shadow gov, secretive cabals and military-industrial complex)—and there is an immense gap between these two. The scientific community is heavily compartmentalized, yet people naively believe that the scientific breakthroughs they see on TV or read on a web-zine are the science, when in fact it's almost a joke in comparison to the actual scientific achievements of the human race. Were this not so, everyone would be riding UFOs nowadays instead of automobiles, and nobody would be paying electricity bills because everything would be powered by so-called "free energy." And yet, it's the 21st century already and people are still depending on oil. But of course, this is no accident.
And people think man went to the moon just once? (Oh, but that was debunked too, wasn't it?) I won't claim to know or believe or think anything here, I will simply say this: may I suggest certain elite pockets of 3rd-density human-beings are already well established not only on the Moon but on planet Mars as well?
Food for thought.
The funny thing that the very definition of science is: "knowledge acquired via study;" which, by definition, would make everyone a scientist—for what is living if not gradual learning and self-development catalyzed by the continual acquisition of knowledge through experience?
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)