01-22-2010, 12:01 PM
(01-22-2010, 05:23 AM)Questioner Wrote: I love looking at this stuff, but my eyes glaze over and my mind shuts down when I try to truly comprehend it. When I say I don't get half of Bucky Fuller's material, this is the half I'm talking about. Same thing when David Wilcock goes into this material: I take a mental vacation until he changes the subject! I wonder, do I need a stronger math background? If I was to diligently study calculus, would these materials start to make sense? I got up to algebra/trig and have bumped into calc concepts from time to time, but never actually studied it.
sacred geometry doesn't really resonant with me either. I have taken five math classes in college (calc 1-3, differential equations, linear algebra), so that fact that it doesn't resonant is caused by something other than a lack of understanding of math in my opinion
