09-01-2012, 01:46 PM
Why not? Consider its scale. It's a rather large object 80M below the ocean, so it can only be photographed one illuminated section at a time. The illustration and others was pure fantasy, fueling much of the "UFO" nonsense.
The 'best' pictures so far are of a somewhat rounded section and some rocks:
![[Image: si-uso-300.jpg]](http://www.cbc.ca/gfx/images/news/topstories/2012/06/15/si-uso-300.jpg)
The 'best' pictures so far are of a somewhat rounded section and some rocks:
![[Image: si-uso-300.jpg]](http://www.cbc.ca/gfx/images/news/topstories/2012/06/15/si-uso-300.jpg)
![[Image: rocks-baltic-sea.jpg]](http://www.thetruthbehindthescenes.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/rocks-baltic-sea.jpg)