08-28-2012, 10:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-29-2012, 01:23 AM by Bring4th_Austin.)
(08-28-2012, 10:09 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote:(08-28-2012, 06:23 PM)Bring4th_Austin Wrote: Using the attack scenario:
Quote:Questioner: Would a perfectly balanced entity feel any emotional response in being attacked by the other-self?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. The response is love.
Great quote. It seems a lot like the quote that started us off.("I realized that in any moment I can simply choose Love.")
What I perceive the difference between Ra's "perfectly balanced entity" and an entity "choosing love" would be that there was no choice made in the response of love. It was an automatic expression sprung from the already-found acceptance within the balanced entity.
Carla, with her Christian roots, sometimes references the quote "not my will, but thine." I believe choosing love would be an expression of "my will," which is still virtuous and is included in the path to acceptance. However, if one is a perfectly balanced entity "waiting for the hand of the Creator to pluck harmony" (thine will), that harmony is not a result of choice but rather a result of being.
_____________________________
The only frontier that has ever existed is the self.
The only frontier that has ever existed is the self.