08-24-2012, 03:52 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-24-2012, 03:55 PM by Bring4th_Austin.)
(08-24-2012, 08:53 AM)ShinAr Wrote: In the quotes on the page posted by Austin Ra is adamantly evading the actual designation of some aspect of difference between logos and sub logos.
Twas Aaron
To respond to the OP, the primal functions of our sun as a sub-Logos are to choose the framework of the Archetypal Mind, as Spaced said, as well as to augment our evolution in various other ways. Ra never goes in depth about how our reality is affected by the sub-Logos, but some specific examples are choosing the form of our 3D body, supposedly granting us opposable thumbs so we may grasp physical tools, and encouraging our communication to be of the sound-vibratory nature rather than telepathic, both in order to intensify the veil.
Ra says that each subsequent Logos gains knowledge from every previous Logos' experiment, learning which archetypal systems and whatever other choices they make regarding our evolution are efficient or inefficient.
Ra also claims that the Logos does not know what sort of effects these choices will have on the existence they spawn, as they are all experiments. For instance, giving us opposable thumbs gave way to the ability to grasp weapons as tools, and created an unexpectedly bellicose existence for several of the planets in this system...this bellicosity has hindered evolution to a great extent. Also, with the very first implementation of the veil, it was "unimagined" that this might give rise to the Service to Self polarity.
Other than that, Ra themselves don't give many hints as to the actual beingness of our sub-Logos, what it experiences, what its the of evolution is like, and how it might affect our evolution after the initial framework for reality is chosen. I feel like the information given by Ra hardly scratches the surface of the concept of the Logos.
_____________________________
The only frontier that has ever existed is the self.
The only frontier that has ever existed is the self.