08-22-2012, 01:54 AM
Mass of fruit in plant compared to mass of biomass in tree compared to mass of biomass in soil +water + what ever thats been used to grow it.
y1+y2+y3 then extrapolate y4 (Which would be the human fruit of cognition which is the "fruit in the fruit")
IF you put 5% there then to get 1 unit of harvestable human cognition from 3rd to 4th you have to rotate 20 humans, or 400 2nd density souls or 8000 units of 1st density matter comparable to what is acquired in 4th density matter if conversion rate of energy to a higher form of mass is 5%
So to keep things in perspective, a 5% of total human population being ready for harvest as a "new" phenomena would be a accomplishment.
Also, not losing 5% of the wanderer population or a sufficiently large number of wanderers to end up at a total loss in sto polarization overall would be rather good.
Losing wanderers is of less significance because they have a very very high probability of recycling back to the 6th or similar very quickly.
SO.
If we harvest 100.000 beings to 4th as a new and lose 200.000 wanders to "karma" its ok because as "time" is played forward much of the wanderers lost will return quicker than the native 3rds will advance?
Is that roughly what Ra is thinking of?
y1+y2+y3 then extrapolate y4 (Which would be the human fruit of cognition which is the "fruit in the fruit")
IF you put 5% there then to get 1 unit of harvestable human cognition from 3rd to 4th you have to rotate 20 humans, or 400 2nd density souls or 8000 units of 1st density matter comparable to what is acquired in 4th density matter if conversion rate of energy to a higher form of mass is 5%
So to keep things in perspective, a 5% of total human population being ready for harvest as a "new" phenomena would be a accomplishment.
Also, not losing 5% of the wanderer population or a sufficiently large number of wanderers to end up at a total loss in sto polarization overall would be rather good.
Losing wanderers is of less significance because they have a very very high probability of recycling back to the 6th or similar very quickly.
SO.
If we harvest 100.000 beings to 4th as a new and lose 200.000 wanders to "karma" its ok because as "time" is played forward much of the wanderers lost will return quicker than the native 3rds will advance?
Is that roughly what Ra is thinking of?