08-20-2012, 03:35 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-20-2012, 03:37 PM by Bring4th_Austin.)
(08-20-2012, 03:05 PM)Spaced Wrote:(08-20-2012, 02:11 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: I didn't actually like Ra's choice of words saying how being harvestable positive is as difficult as being harvested negative in terms of percents. It makes it sound harder than it really is. I don't think for someone with a good heart that it's all that hard to be 51% STO. The Ra material makes it sound that much harder. But I think they want us to get all we can out of 3D because the higher densities are more slow growing because of how harmonious they are. Patrick, your feedback always makes me think.
Consider the possibility that it is not you who decides how effective your service to other is, but the others themselves. You might think you are serving others but they may see your actions as disservice. There is also the possibility that your service will backfire and end up creating more problems than solutions (even Ra is not immune to this, as can be seen by the fact that they are still cleaning up the mess their legacy turned into).
I think this is where it becomes important to balance your Love with Wisdom, to see where your service might be beneficial and where it might be best to keep yer trap shut
Yet on the other hand, Ra claims that it is unwise to be attached to the outcome of our actions.
If our intent is true and pure to serve others, does the outcome affect our polarity? Is our polarity determined by how others view our actions?
In regards to the difficulty of reaching 51% service to others, I don't much like the percentage take on harvestability. I think it is much more useful to look at Ra's other descriptions of gaining harvestability regarding opening of energy centers and balance...these are much more measurable for us than our "percentage of Service to Others," which is a concept I don't think makes much sense anyways. Note that it was brought up in a question that Don asked and was not something Ra offered on their own. Just because it is applicable doesn't necessarily mean it is useful.
Anywho, we have to remember that this is our final incarnation of this cycle. For native 3Ders, who knows how many lifetimes we have spent striving for harvestability? Perhaps it is much more difficult than we would realize within this incarnation. If we are alive now then chances are we were very close to harvestability already, making the goal seem easier than if we view it from the entirety of our incarnations in 3D. We've likely been working very hard throughout hundreds, thousands, or more lifetimes to reach this point. This is the last few steps of a marathon; they might be the hardest steps of the entire event, but they're nothing compared the the whole race.
_____________________________
The only frontier that has ever existed is the self.
The only frontier that has ever existed is the self.