07-09-2012, 01:51 PM
Thank you for your response, Gary. I agree that there's no question the bulk of our catalyst comes from interactions with human other-selves. I stated this here:
However, my main question has to do with whether an entity is considered an other-self, for purposes of compassion.
As stated above, being that our primary requirement for polarizing is love and compassion for other-selves, then if we encounter an entity - any entity, any density - in a situation that is crying out for compassion, what is the appropriate response?
(06-22-2012, 05:13 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: We're not likely to hold a grudge against our dog for pooping on the carpet, in the same way we might harbor resentment towards our abusive father. So clearly, our little furry 2D brethren don't facilitate the same type of catalyst that 3D humans do.
But, in terms of service to others, and activating green ray by developing compassion for other-selves, how is it any different dealing with an animal, compared to dealing with a human?
Is compassion is compassion is compassion? Or, are there degrees of compassion? Is compassion bestowed upon a human somehow more evolved, more noble, more benevolent than compassion bestowed upon an animal?
However, my main question has to do with whether an entity is considered an other-self, for purposes of compassion.
As stated above, being that our primary requirement for polarizing is love and compassion for other-selves, then if we encounter an entity - any entity, any density - in a situation that is crying out for compassion, what is the appropriate response?