I am glad you brought Judgement up, Ankh. I wanted to write something about it, but now it is even better to continue with the concept.
Some believe the act of Judgement is one-way, as in one entity doing something to the other.
I believe that it is a two-way street. Or in other words: you need two entities to have one judgement going on.
What this means is that not only those that are judged (seemingly) basically ask for it by vibrationally reacting, accepting or relating to the judgement itself, it also means that if we realize that we are not only all one, we contain the parts that we are judging in "others" as well, then we can neutralize any possible effects of that.
Sometimes I hear/read some people, saying "why should I endure when others are judging me? cant they just, like, stop? Well, I want them to stop!". The issue with this is that when we are wanting others to behave this way or that way, we are placing the power outside our own will, and are putting an "if" switch to something that is entirely personal. Judgement can hold literally no value if one being embraces everything that it represents, because there will be no things to be "judged". Am I dumb? Oh, well, yes I am, a lot of times. Am I an ugly freak? Well thank you!
When people are judging, they assume that there is a "right" way and a "wrong" way - and they believe that their way is the right one, of course. When someone being "ugly" is a pejorative or a degrading term, it must mean that being "beautiful" is the "right" way. It is not. It can be attractive to some, but nature is not always a shiny polished piece of art either - beauty and "ugliness" is equally valid. Acting with haste, without consideration, can be considered "wrong" by some, but then again: carefully analyzing every situation might be just as valid as listening to deep urges, reacting from "the gut". These are just basic examples were the judgement only works or holds any value because we place one quality that we like to associate with over other qualities.
Some believe the act of Judgement is one-way, as in one entity doing something to the other.
I believe that it is a two-way street. Or in other words: you need two entities to have one judgement going on.
What this means is that not only those that are judged (seemingly) basically ask for it by vibrationally reacting, accepting or relating to the judgement itself, it also means that if we realize that we are not only all one, we contain the parts that we are judging in "others" as well, then we can neutralize any possible effects of that.
Sometimes I hear/read some people, saying "why should I endure when others are judging me? cant they just, like, stop? Well, I want them to stop!". The issue with this is that when we are wanting others to behave this way or that way, we are placing the power outside our own will, and are putting an "if" switch to something that is entirely personal. Judgement can hold literally no value if one being embraces everything that it represents, because there will be no things to be "judged". Am I dumb? Oh, well, yes I am, a lot of times. Am I an ugly freak? Well thank you!
When people are judging, they assume that there is a "right" way and a "wrong" way - and they believe that their way is the right one, of course. When someone being "ugly" is a pejorative or a degrading term, it must mean that being "beautiful" is the "right" way. It is not. It can be attractive to some, but nature is not always a shiny polished piece of art either - beauty and "ugliness" is equally valid. Acting with haste, without consideration, can be considered "wrong" by some, but then again: carefully analyzing every situation might be just as valid as listening to deep urges, reacting from "the gut". These are just basic examples were the judgement only works or holds any value because we place one quality that we like to associate with over other qualities.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)