06-05-2012, 06:26 PM
I agree with you Oldern, I have very a similar philosophy.
Consider this. Imagine we had a middle age woman with 6 kids, and who works at a Drug and Alcohol rehabilitation centre for people who were committed against their will. Now, this lady might spend 80% of her life in control mode. She HAS to, or her kids will run riot, and her patients will find ways to relapse and won't get better. She is essentially, "infringing on the free will" of many in her life, which we equate with having a negative impact on polarization, but she is doing it all out of love. So how does this effect her harvestability? Her life is totally STO, but her life is also dependent on control. Surely we can't chalk that control up as a STS act.
I do have a point I'm trying to work towards here.
Consider this. Imagine we had a middle age woman with 6 kids, and who works at a Drug and Alcohol rehabilitation centre for people who were committed against their will. Now, this lady might spend 80% of her life in control mode. She HAS to, or her kids will run riot, and her patients will find ways to relapse and won't get better. She is essentially, "infringing on the free will" of many in her life, which we equate with having a negative impact on polarization, but she is doing it all out of love. So how does this effect her harvestability? Her life is totally STO, but her life is also dependent on control. Surely we can't chalk that control up as a STS act.
I do have a point I'm trying to work towards here.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)