05-16-2012, 10:00 AM
(05-16-2012, 09:47 AM)Tango Wrote: If one is 51% STO, for example, then what accounts for the other 49% of that person orientation? Perhaps it includes the innate need to survive.
If so, then I think the act of eating is either healthy/wholesome or full of disease STS , depending on the nature of one's relationship with their food at any given time.
This is the case. It is STS that is not exactly polarizing until conscious thought comes into play.
Spending your life as a compassionate volunteer trying to feed everyone is STO polarizing. Spending your life making sure you are always satiated is not STO polarizing. Polarization is then effected when awareness of the hows and whys of acquiring food is learned and you do not make choices accordingly.
Food is definitely a choice. Conscious choices polarize.